Desipio Message Board

General Category => Desipio Lounge => Topic started by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 23, 2007, 12:16:52 AM

Title: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 23, 2007, 12:16:52 AM
The Age of The Marmot gets a big 'ole positive from PPE.

(http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/547618/2/istockphoto_547618_big_thumbs_up.jpg)
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 12:23:23 AM
Agreed.

He was downright sick in the 8th.

In the 9th, the banjo player at second base should have turned two, but instead played the ball to the side like a scared little leaguer.  It didn't faze the Marmot, who got the next two hitters to escape the jam he hardly created.

But isn't there already a Marmot Sploogey somewhere around here?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 23, 2007, 12:34:31 AM
Quote from: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 12:23:23 AM
Agreed.

He was downright sick in the 8th.

In the 9th, the banjo player at second base should have turned two, but instead played the ball to the side like a scared little leaguer.  It didn't faze the Marmot, who got the next two hitters to escape the jam he hardly created.

But isn't there already a Marmot Sploogey somewhere around here?

Probably. But we don't play "bandwidth is sacred" bullshit games here. I was too lazy to do a search, so sue me. The Marmot is so good, he deserves multiple splooges in any event.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 12:46:09 AM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 23, 2007, 12:34:31 AM
Quote from: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 12:23:23 AM
Agreed.

He was downright sick in the 8th.

In the 9th, the banjo player at second base should have turned two, but instead played the ball to the side like a scared little leaguer.  It didn't faze the Marmot, who got the next two hitters to escape the jam he hardly created.

But isn't there already a Marmot Sploogey somewhere around here?

Probably. But we don't play "bandwidth is sacred" bullshit games here. I was too lazy to do a search, so sue me. The Marmot is so good, he deserves multiple splooges in any event.


Well well well, aren't YOU a considerate bloke?  I assume you've got a closet full of Hank White Fan Club T-Shirts, then.  Besides, the search engine here is painfully simple.

And I honestly was not aware that I actually started this thread. (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=5044.0)

Also, as a supplement to Marmol, I'm still holding out hope for Wood.  I just don't trust Howry.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 23, 2007, 01:04:50 AM
Quote from: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 12:46:09 AM
Also, as a supplement to Marmol, I'm still holding out hope for Wood.  I just don't trust Howry.

Said it a million times--the deal with Howry is that he's one of those odd guys that pitches BETTER when he's used frequently. When he gets infrequent work, he sucks. When did Howry pitch his best this year? Answer--when Dempster was out.

Another reliever with an odd usage pattern is Mike Wuertz. When he starts an inning fresh, he stinks. But when he comes in with men on base, he's money (2nd best pctg for not letting inherited runners score in the NL....behind the Marmot).

Will F. Ohman is an oddball, too. If he's used in a major league baseball game, he sucks.

Kerry Wood, I dunno, love the guy like everyone else, but he strikes me as more of a circus curiosity than anything else. Bit player.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: bozos72 on August 23, 2007, 07:56:37 AM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 23, 2007, 01:04:50 AM
Quote from: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 12:46:09 AM
Also, as a supplement to Marmol, I'm still holding out hope for Wood.  I just don't trust Howry.

Said it a million times--the deal with Howry is that he's one of those odd guys that pitches BETTER when he's used frequently. When he gets infrequent work, he sucks. When did Howry pitch his best this year? Answer--when Dempster was out.

Another reliever with an odd usage pattern is Mike Wuertz. When he starts an inning fresh, he stinks. But when he comes in with men on base, he's money (2nd best pctg for not letting inherited runners score in the NL....behind the Marmot).

Will F. Ohman is an oddball, too. If he's used in a major league baseball game, he sucks.

Kerry Wood, I dunno, love the guy like everyone else, but he strikes me as more of a circus curiosity than anything else. Bit player.


That's some funny shit, right there.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Andy on August 23, 2007, 09:21:34 AM
Is Kerry still on the team?  Has anybody seen him?  Bueller?  Bueller?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:36:34 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 09:21:34 AM
Is Kerry still on the team?  Has anybody seen him?  Bueller?  Bueller?

I'm guessing one of two things:
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 09:40:27 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:36:34 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 09:21:34 AM
Is Kerry still on the team?  Has anybody seen him?  Bueller?  Bueller?

I'm guessing one of two things:

  • Either Piniella doesn't want to use him in close games yet, or:
  • He's toast, and they're waiting until they're back in Chicago to announce it.

There's zippy chance they're using a roster spot at this juncture (in 1st place in late August) with someone who they don't feel can contribute anything.  So there's no way he's considered "toast".

I don't know why Lou would put him in tight situations when he has enough effective right-handed bullpen help right now.  However, after two nights of fairly active bullpen use, Kerry might want to be ready today regardless of the situation.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:44:20 AM
Woody was warming up Monday or Tuesday, I forget which. Didn't he get into Monday's game?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Taylor on August 23, 2007, 09:47:46 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:44:20 AM
Woody was warming up Monday or Tuesday, I forget which. Didn't he get into Monday's game?

Wood pitched the 7th inning on Monday's game and went 1-2-3. He came in after Piggy gave up a lead off home run.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 10:06:12 AM
I'd be surprised if Bonds is in the line-up today (day game following a night game).

I watched some of the Brewers-D'backs game last night. It's huge that the Cubs miss facing Webb in the next series. With their patience and plate discipline (though improved over previous seasons), they'd have been shut out.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:08:11 AM
Quote from: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 10:06:12 AM
I'd be surprised if Bonds is in the line-up today (day game following a night game).

I watched some of the Brewers-D'backs game last night. It's huge that the Cubs miss facing Webb in the next series. With their patience and plate discipline (though improved over previous seasons), they'd have been shut out.

They beat him at Wrigley last month. But I am ecstatic that they'll finish the 2007 regular season with a 1.000 winning percentage against him. Maybe they'll miss him in the playoffs too. But I doubt it.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Taylor on August 23, 2007, 10:09:57 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

I think it was during the first game of the series when Barriod was being intentionally walked and after ball 2 he rather disgustedly whipped off some of the 900 lbs of armor plating that he wears at the plate. Now that's bravery.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:11:36 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:08:11 AM
Quote from: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 10:06:12 AM
I'd be surprised if Bonds is in the line-up today (day game following a night game).

I watched some of the Brewers-D'backs game last night. It's huge that the Cubs miss facing Webb in the next series. With their patience and plate discipline (though improved over previous seasons), they'd have been shut out.

They beat him at Wrigley last month. But I am ecstatic that they'll finish the 2007 regular season with a 1.000 winning percentage against him. Maybe they'll miss him in the playoffs too. But I doubt it.

Z vs Webb would be steak balls. That's one you postpone the birth of a child for.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: thehawk on August 23, 2007, 10:21:53 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

Pretty sure you can just throw in the general direction of the dugout, and let the gravational pull of Barroid's head take over, that thing is the size of a planatoid.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:25:16 AM
Quote from: thehawk on August 23, 2007, 10:21:53 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

Pretty sure you can just throw in the general direction of the dugout, and let the gravational pull of Barroid's head take over, that thing is the size of a planatoid.

That would explain why seemingly everyone in San Francisco is planted in/near that guy's ass.  It's just simple undeniable physics, after all.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 10:28:06 AM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:25:16 AM
Quote from: thehawk on August 23, 2007, 10:21:53 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

Pretty sure you can just throw in the general direction of the dugout, and let the gravational pull of Barroid's head take over, that thing is the size of a planatoid.

That would explain why seemingly everyone in San Francisco is planted in/near that guy's ass.  It's just simple undeniable physics, after all.

His ass is even denser than his head?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Taylor on August 23, 2007, 10:29:13 AM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 10:28:06 AM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:25:16 AM
Quote from: thehawk on August 23, 2007, 10:21:53 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

Pretty sure you can just throw in the general direction of the dugout, and let the gravational pull of Barroid's head take over, that thing is the size of a planatoid.

That would explain why seemingly everyone in San Francisco is planted in/near that guy's ass.  It's just simple undeniable physics, after all.

His ass is even denser than his head?

Well his head is jammed up there so yeah.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:41:43 AM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 10:28:06 AM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:25:16 AM
Quote from: thehawk on August 23, 2007, 10:21:53 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

Pretty sure you can just throw in the general direction of the dugout, and let the gravational pull of Barroid's head take over, that thing is the size of a planatoid.

That would explain why seemingly everyone in San Francisco is planted in/near that guy's ass.  It's just simple undeniable physics, after all.

His ass is even denser than his head?

Most of the steroids likely entered through his ass.  Therefore, it functions as the hub/epicenter of the Barry universe.  You'll also notice that he generally talks through it, as well.

Despite the ginormity of his head, it really functions more as a "moon". 

This was one of the topics being discussed at Steak & Shake as a matter of fact.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Capt. Over on August 23, 2007, 10:46:56 AM
Quote from: Taylor on August 23, 2007, 10:09:57 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

I think it was during the first game of the series when Barriod was being intentionally walked and after ball 2 he rather disgustedly whipped off some of the 900 lbs of armor plating that he wears at the plate. Now that's bravery.

Bonds did that last night against Marmol as well.  He tore off his body armor and threw it in disgust toward the dugout after ball 2 or 3.  They cut to a close-up of his face after that and I swear he was about to cry.  Next time he prematurely removes the kevlar the Cubs should forget the walk and go after him, just to see the creepy freak's reaction.  What a douche.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Taylor on August 23, 2007, 10:53:32 AM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:41:43 AM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 10:28:06 AM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:25:16 AM
Quote from: thehawk on August 23, 2007, 10:21:53 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

Pretty sure you can just throw in the general direction of the dugout, and let the gravational pull of Barroid's head take over, that thing is the size of a planatoid.

That would explain why seemingly everyone in San Francisco is planted in/near that guy's ass.  It's just simple undeniable physics, after all.

His ass is even denser than his head?

Most of the steroids likely entered through his ass.  Therefore, it functions as the hub/epicenter of the Barry universe.  You'll also notice that he generally talks through it, as well.

Despite the ginormity of his head, it really functions more as a "moon". 

This was one of the topics being discussed at Steak & Shake as a matter of fact.

Speaking of that I was  watching the highlights of the Tards' game. Pooholes was gimping around the bases on his home run. My first (and only) thought was they must have given him his injection right before game time either in the ass, thigh or his sack the way he was hobbling around the bases.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 11:04:41 AM
Quote from: Capt. Over on August 23, 2007, 10:46:56 AM
Quote from: Taylor on August 23, 2007, 10:09:57 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

I think it was during the first game of the series when Barriod was being intentionally walked and after ball 2 he rather disgustedly whipped off some of the 900 lbs of armor plating that he wears at the plate. Now that's bravery.

Bonds did that last night against Marmol as well.  He tore off his body armor and threw it in disgust toward the dugout after ball 2 or 3.  They cut to a close-up of his face after that and I swear he was about to cry.  Next time he prematurely removes the kevlar the Cubs should forget the walk and go after him, just to see the creepy freak's reaction.  What a douche.

High and tight.

At the very least, have Kendall step back into the catcher's box as if they're pitching to him until Barry asks for time to reattach his prosthetic arm, only to come back to walk on two more intentional balls.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 11:07:59 AM
Quote from: Taylor on August 23, 2007, 10:53:32 AM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:41:43 AM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 10:28:06 AM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 10:25:16 AM
Quote from: thehawk on August 23, 2007, 10:21:53 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 10:03:48 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 23, 2007, 09:50:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 09:45:18 AM
I really believe Kerry's fine and just being used cautiously. I've got no problem with that. He was good his last outing, right? No worries here.

Let's hope Z goes 9 and makes this moot beans Barroid in his grotesque, giant seedless head.

Schadenfreude'd.

No way in Hell Barroid gets in the box against Big Z.

He could fire one into the dugout then right at Barroid's noggin and maybe get a riccochet off of Boche's giant gourd.

I think Barroid's head would just pop like the big fucking balloon it is.

Pretty sure you can just throw in the general direction of the dugout, and let the gravational pull of Barroid's head take over, that thing is the size of a planatoid.

That would explain why seemingly everyone in San Francisco is planted in/near that guy's ass.  It's just simple undeniable physics, after all.

His ass is even denser than his head?

Most of the steroids likely entered through his ass.  Therefore, it functions as the hub/epicenter of the Barry universe.  You'll also notice that he generally talks through it, as well.

Despite the ginormity of his head, it really functions more as a "moon". 

This was one of the topics being discussed at Steak & Shake as a matter of fact.

Speaking of that I was  watching the highlights of the Tards' game. Pooholes was gimping around the bases on his home run. My first (and only) thought was they must have given him his injection right before game time either in the ass, thigh or his sack the way he was hobbling around the bases.

Intrepid Reader: Gary Sheffield

Steroids is something you shoot in your butt.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.

I told my friend the same thing while we were at the bar.  You force the Giants to burn a bench player--but the only thing is that if it's Gary Roberts, you all but hand them 2nd as well.  A 2-base walk and Bonds out of the lineup is still better than a ball in the Cove, but it doesn't seem like an altogether easy decision in that instance.

As for pinch-running Pie, I think that was the absolutely correct move.  You need that run, bad.  It'll make a huge difference on a single that's in-between whether to send or hold him, or on a ball hit like Kendall's, if you send the runner on contact or not.  I think that might be the biggest difference.  You aren't going to see that spot batting for another 2 innings (most likely), it's the go-ahead run, and in a close game, you probably want the superior defense and fresh legs.  I think it was the right move.

Oh, and had Pie hit that ball, he would've been standing on second.  Clifford just barely got in.  That's the difference in speed right there.  A lot.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:18:08 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.

Gary Roberts

Excited for hockey, are ya?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:18:20 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
I told my friend the same thing while we were at the bar.  You force the Giants to burn a bench player--but the only thing is that if it's Gary Roberts, you all but hand them 2nd as well.  A 2-base walk and Bonds out of the lineup is still better than a ball in the Cove, but it doesn't seem like an altogether easy decision in that instance.

(http://i15.tinypic.com/53sip0o.jpg)?

Or (http://images.google.com/images?q=gary+roberts)?

Dave's not here, man?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:18:59 PM
D'ohz0rs!
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:19:53 PM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:18:59 PM
D'ohz0rs!


We doubled our fun. You searched for the pic, the extra mile is what got you beat. But the effort doesn't go unrecognized.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:22:06 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:19:53 PM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:18:59 PM
D'ohz0rs!


We doubled our fun. You searched for the pic, the extra mile is what got you beat. But the effort doesn't go unrecognized.

Plus, I got sidetracked by comic book rape porn (http://images.google.com/images?q=gary+roberts).
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 12:46:29 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.

I told my friend the same thing while we were at the bar.  You force the Giants to burn a bench player--but the only thing is that if it's Gary Roberts, you all but hand them 2nd as well.  A 2-base walk and Bonds out of the lineup is still better than a ball in the Cove, but it doesn't seem like an altogether easy decision in that instance.

As for pinch-running Pie, I think that was the absolutely correct move.  You need that run, bad.  It'll make a huge difference on a single that's in-between whether to send or hold him, or on a ball hit like Kendall's, if you send the runner on contact or not.  I think that might be the biggest difference.  You aren't going to see that spot batting for another 2 innings (most likely), it's the go-ahead run, and in a close game, you probably want the superior defense and fresh legs.  I think it was the right move.

Oh, and had Pie hit that ball, he would've been standing on second.  Clifford just barely got in.  That's the difference in speed right there.  A lot.

Yea, the Pie move last night was fine because he was being placed in scoring position with no one out...and because it was Cliff Floyd, not Barry Bonds leaving the game.  The chance that his speed comes into play is far greater when you still have three chances to get him in. 

In the case of Bonds being removed, there were already two outs and more than just a simple single was needed for it to have made any difference in the outcome.

One specific goof Lou made earlier in the year with pinch hitters and intentional walks, had to do with him using Darryle Ward as a pinch hitter in the manner below.  Here's the inning transcript from the April 23rd loss against Milwaukee.  The score was 4-4 at the time after Scott Eyre had just wet the bed and cost Z a chance to win.  Here, Lou essentially burned two bench players to get speed for a player (Hank) who was neither the tying or go-ahead run.  They ended up losing the game in 12 innings, and running out of position players. 

Bottom 8th: Chi Cubs - C. Villanueva relieved K. Mench 
- A. Ramirez walked 
- J. Jones sacrificed to first, A. Ramirez to second 
- M. DeRosa struck out swinging 
- D. Ward hit for H. Blanco 
- D. Ward intentionally walked 
- M. Barrett hit for C. Izturis 
- R. Cedeno ran for D. Ward 
- M. Barrett lined out to left 

So my point, is that Lou himself has been a little pinch-run happy at times.  It's especially odd considering how much he hates to bunt.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:57:47 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 12:46:29 PM
In the case of Bonds being removed, there were already two outs and more than just a simple single was needed for it to have made any difference in the outcome.

Except Roberts was put in to steal his way into scoring position. And that steal was pretty much kismet against Manson's arm, fireballer on the mound or no.

Those 2 outs do make it a tough call, though, with the prospect of extra innings. And, considering the Giants were playing at home, and bearing in mind the disparity in power between Bonds and everyone else, yeah, I think I agree that losing Bonds' bat was probably too high a price for a single opportunity at pushing across the winning run.

But I don't think it was quite as bad of a call as you're making it out to be.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 01:08:48 PM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:57:47 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 12:46:29 PM
In the case of Bonds being removed, there were already two outs and more than just a simple single was needed for it to have made any difference in the outcome.

Except Roberts was put in to steal his way into scoring position. And that steal was pretty much kismet against Manson's arm, fireballer on the mound or no.

Those 2 outs do make it a tough call, though, with the prospect of extra innings. And, considering the Giants were playing at home, and bearing in mind the disparity in power between Bonds and everyone else, yeah, I think I agree that losing Bonds' bat was probably too high a price for a single opportunity at pushing across the winning run.

But I don't think it was quite as bad of a call as you're making it out to be.

Fair enough.  But that's working off the presumption at the time that the stolen base is certain.

Even as bad as Kendall has been, there was still a 10%-15% shot that Roberts could've been thrown out by Manson.  Or, there's the possibility that Benji either fouls off or puts the first pitch into play.  If Benji does take pitches to let Roberts steal he's more likely to fall behind in the count, first base is open, and then Carlos can essenitally pitch him using only unhittable dogshit (which is pretty much what happened).

So to me, it's not exactly as simple as Lou having chosen to "walk" Dave Roberts to 2nd base.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:18:08 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.

Gary Roberts

Excited for hockey, are ya?

Just a little.  My other tabbed windows were opened to the Penguins website and letsgopens.com's message board.  Hence the slip, but still a moran moment.

I'd fix it, but I think it's funnier as is, since, well, I've been caught, and it'd just be revisionist history.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 01:27:36 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 01:08:48 PM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:57:47 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 12:46:29 PM
In the case of Bonds being removed, there were already two outs and more than just a simple single was needed for it to have made any difference in the outcome.

Except Roberts was put in to steal his way into scoring position. And that steal was pretty much kismet against Manson's arm, fireballer on the mound or no.

Those 2 outs do make it a tough call, though, with the prospect of extra innings. And, considering the Giants were playing at home, and bearing in mind the disparity in power between Bonds and everyone else, yeah, I think I agree that losing Bonds' bat was probably too high a price for a single opportunity at pushing across the winning run.

But I don't think it was quite as bad of a call as you're making it out to be.

...If Benji does take pitches to let Roberts steal he's more likely to fall behind in the count, first base is open, and then Carlos can essenitally pitch him using only unhittable dogshit (which is pretty much what happened).

So to me, it's not exactly as simple as Lou having chosen to "walk" Dave Roberts to 2nd base.

Very true.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 01:30:07 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 01:08:48 PM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 23, 2007, 12:57:47 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 12:46:29 PM
In the case of Bonds being removed, there were already two outs and more than just a simple single was needed for it to have made any difference in the outcome.

Except Roberts was put in to steal his way into scoring position. And that steal was pretty much kismet against Manson's arm, fireballer on the mound or no.

Those 2 outs do make it a tough call, though, with the prospect of extra innings. And, considering the Giants were playing at home, and bearing in mind the disparity in power between Bonds and everyone else, yeah, I think I agree that losing Bonds' bat was probably too high a price for a single opportunity at pushing across the winning run.

But I don't think it was quite as bad of a call as you're making it out to be.

Fair enough.  But that's working off the presumption at the time that the stolen base is certain.

Even as bad as Kendall has been, there was still a 10%-15% shot that Roberts could've been thrown out by Manson.  Or, there's the possibility that Benji either fouls off or puts the first pitch into play.  If Benji does take pitches to let Roberts steal he's more likely to fall behind in the count, first base is open, and then Carlos can essenitally pitch him using only unhittable dogshit (which is pretty much what happened).

So to me, it's not exactly as simple as Lou having chosen to "walk" Dave Roberts to 2nd base.

Not to mention, Bengie's OBP is a whopping 20 points above his .275 batting average. Pathetic.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 01:31:42 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:18:08 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.

Gary Roberts

Excited for hockey, are ya?

Just a little.  My other tabbed windows were opened to the Penguins website and letsgopens.com's message board.  Hence the slip, but still a moran moment.

I'd fix it, but I think it's funnier as is, since, well, I've been caught, and it'd just be revisionist history.

We need to have a Desipio Hockee Night. It'll probably be just us three, though. And Mrs. Fork - she loves her hockey.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 01:31:42 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:18:08 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.

Gary Roberts

Excited for hockey, are ya?

Just a little.  My other tabbed windows were opened to the Penguins website and letsgopens.com's message board.  Hence the slip, but still a moran moment.

I'd fix it, but I think it's funnier as is, since, well, I've been caught, and it'd just be revisionist history.

We need to have a Desipio Hockee Night. It'll probably be just us three, though. And Mrs. Fork - she loves her hockey.

If she's making shortcake, I'll be there, even though I'm not a big hockey fan.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 01:56:08 PM
Hockey Night sounds fun. If not the Blackhawks, then maybe the Wolves. I'm in charge of the off-ice guys in Quad City, and we're now in the AHL as the AAA affiliate of Calgary. I could score some free tickets (well, maybe not 20).
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 01:57:34 PM
Quote from: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 01:54:58 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 01:31:42 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 01:26:56 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 12:18:08 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 12:02:35 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 23, 2007, 11:31:44 AM
Quote from: Andy on August 23, 2007, 11:14:58 AM
My favorite part of the Barry intentional walk is that it looked like Lou told him they were going to do it.  After the mound visit he walked right past the plate and smiled and said something to Barry.  I'm almost positive he told him they weren't pitching to him.

I think it'd be funny if Barry would actually throw the bat away with the elbow guard on ball three and see if the other team still intentionally throws ball four.  I'd be surprised if they even noticed, but how great would it be to see a guy without a bat get intentionally walked?

If Barroid took no bat to the plate whatsoever, he'd still the best hitter in that sorry Giants lineup.

Boche fucked up though last night, in my opinion.  I've criticized Lou for this in the past with Cliff Floyd, so why not when the other manager does it with Barry Bonds in that shitty lineup...

What is this trend of pinch-running for your best hitters in a tied game?  To me, it seems far less likely that the extra bit of speed will make more of a difference, than keeping that player in for possible extra innings.  I realize some of these power hitters are slow, and perhaps even lazy...but it's not exactly akin to going from a 90 yar-old in a walker to Ben Johnson, either.   Not only that, but you have one less option left on your bench.  It just seems like an extra-bad play in the National League. 

I wouldn't be surprised if anticipating that move by Boche made walking Barry go from an easy decision to an absolute slam-dunk, nothing to think about type of decision.  Not only do you not have to pitch to him, but he'll be out of the game completely.

Gary Roberts

Excited for hockey, are ya?

Just a little.  My other tabbed windows were opened to the Penguins website and letsgopens.com's message board.  Hence the slip, but still a moran moment.

I'd fix it, but I think it's funnier as is, since, well, I've been caught, and it'd just be revisionist history.

We need to have a Desipio Hockee Night. It'll probably be just us three, though. And Mrs. Fork - she loves her hockey.

If she's making shortcake, I'll be there, even though I'm not a big hockey fan.

Just steer clear of the Steve Miller beforehand...
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Chuckosan on August 23, 2007, 02:14:43 PM
Quote from: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 01:56:08 PM
Hockey Night sounds fun. If not the Blackhawks, then maybe the Wolves. I'm in charge of the off-ice guys in Quad City, and we're now in the AHL as the AAA affiliate of Calgary. I could score some free tickets (well, maybe not 20).
And my client owns the broadcast truck for the Wolves.  SD, not HD.  Butr might me able to score some all access passes.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 02:43:19 PM
Any good strip clubs in the vicinity of Allstate Arena?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: EG on August 23, 2007, 02:44:37 PM
Quote from: Chuckosan on August 23, 2007, 02:14:43 PM
Butr might me able to score some all access passes.

You have the worst typos, Chuck.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 02:54:12 PM
Home, home is 40 minutes from the Quad Cities for me.  The Wolves play there on Friday Nov 2, would be a good game for me to come back for, if anyone wanted to catch that one here.

I'd be down for a Wolves game too.  I guess it's not their year (or Quad Cities) to play the Baby Pens, which is a shame.  Maybe next year.

Also, if my apartment gets satellite that lets me buy the hockey plan, I'll get it.  But I'm down for Desipio Hockee Night.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 03:00:13 PM
Quote from: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 02:43:19 PM
Any good strip clubs in the vicinity of Allstate Arena?

Heavenly Bodies is about 3 miles straight down Touhy from the Allstate Arena.

Haven't been there for about 6-7 years, though, so I can't speak for it's quality.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 03:02:16 PM
Quote from: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 03:00:13 PM
Quote from: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 02:43:19 PM
Any good strip clubs in the vicinity of Allstate Arena?

Heavenly Bodies is about 3 miles straight down Touhy from the Allstate Arena.

Haven't been there for about 6-7 years, though, so I can't speak for it's quality.

there's the Krispy Kreme on Mannheim, so we can stop in and say hello to Hendry.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CT II on August 23, 2007, 03:17:09 PM
Hockey night?  I'm in.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 03:20:41 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 23, 2007, 02:54:12 PM
Home, home is 40 minutes from the Quad Cities for me.  The Wolves play there on Friday Nov 2, would be a good game for me to come back for, if anyone wanted to catch that one here.

I'd be down for a Wolves game too.  I guess it's not their year (or Quad Cities) to play the Baby Pens, which is a shame.  Maybe next year.

Also, if my apartment gets satellite that lets me buy the hockey plan, I'll get it.  But I'm down for Desipio Hockee Night.

Actually, I meant maybe I could hook up some tickets for the games in Chicago, but feel free to contact me if you ever need some for the QCs.

And CT, I knew we could count you in.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: TJ on August 23, 2007, 03:28:18 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 03:02:16 PM
Quote from: Down In Front on August 23, 2007, 03:00:13 PM
Quote from: Dave B on August 23, 2007, 02:43:19 PM
Any good strip clubs in the vicinity of Allstate Arena?

Heavenly Bodies is about 3 miles straight down Touhy from the Allstate Arena.

Haven't been there for about 6-7 years, though, so I can't speak for it's quality.

there's the Krispy Kreme on Mannheim, so we can stop in and say hello to Hendry.

It's the one closest to Hendry's home, so maybe he'll be there injesting a dozen.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 03:40:29 PM
I'm down, but I'm not going to see some goddamn Wolves game.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:08:23 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 03:40:29 PM
I'm down, but I'm not going to see some goddamn Wolves game.

I'd like to go back in time to 1995 and go to a Hawks/Leafs game.  Make it happen.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: TJ on August 23, 2007, 04:12:05 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:08:23 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 03:40:29 PM
I'm down, but I'm not going to see some goddamn Wolves game.

I'd like to go back in time to 1995 1994 and go to a Hawks/Leafs game.  Make it happen.

(http://i16.ebayimg.com/05/i/06/8b/cf/2a_1.JPG)
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:19:07 PM
Quote from: TJ on August 23, 2007, 04:12:05 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:08:23 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 03:40:29 PM
I'm down, but I'm not going to see some goddamn Wolves game.

I'd like to go back in time to 1995 1994 and go to a Hawks/Leafs game.  Make it happen.

(http://i16.ebayimg.com/05/i/06/8b/cf/2a_1.JPG)

Is that from their final game in the Stadium?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kermit on August 23, 2007, 04:39:43 PM
Damnit, I've been too busy today, but I was going to write a post about drilling Bonds in the elbow once he removed his guard and now I read this.  Ah, screw you guys.  I'm doing it tonight, anyhow.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: TJ on August 23, 2007, 04:45:02 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:19:07 PM
Quote from: TJ on August 23, 2007, 04:12:05 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:08:23 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 03:40:29 PM
I'm down, but I'm not going to see some goddamn Wolves game.

I'd like to go back in time to 1995 1994 and go to a Hawks/Leafs game.  Make it happen.

(http://i16.ebayimg.com/05/i/06/8b/cf/2a_1.JPG)

Is that from their final game in the Stadium?

It is.

Forgot to write: Remember the Roar'd
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 05:37:59 PM
Quote from: TJ on August 23, 2007, 04:45:02 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:19:07 PM
Quote from: TJ on August 23, 2007, 04:12:05 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 23, 2007, 04:08:23 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 23, 2007, 03:40:29 PM
I'm down, but I'm not going to see some goddamn Wolves game.

I'd like to go back in time to 1995 1994 and go to a Hawks/Leafs game.  Make it happen.

(http://i16.ebayimg.com/05/i/06/8b/cf/2a_1.JPG)

Is that from their final game in the Stadium?

It is.

Forgot to write: Remember the Roar'd

I loved the 1994 Hawks. Especially once the put on Ranjas sweaters.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 23, 2007, 07:53:37 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 23, 2007, 03:17:09 PM
Hockey night?  I'm in.

I'm down like four flats. You might have to explain a bunch of shit to me at first but I catch on pretty fast. Go Hawks. I'm not kidding, joking or lying about seeing an assload of games this year and every year. There aint no reason not to. It's just fung.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:36:42 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

That reminds me - I need to go to Home Depot and pick up some shovels and hoes.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CT II on August 24, 2007, 03:53:08 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 05:37:59 PM
I loved the 1994 Hawks. Especially once the put on Ranjas sweaters.

Brian Noonan?

Fuckin' aye.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 08:50:25 PM
Quote from: CT II on August 24, 2007, 03:53:08 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 23, 2007, 05:37:59 PM
I loved the 1994 Hawks. Especially once the put on Ranjas sweaters.

Brian Noonan?

Fuckin' aye.

MATTEAU! MATTEAU! MATTEAU!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=rezwWI9omAU
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: StewiesBandwagon on August 25, 2007, 12:10:38 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:36:42 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

That reminds me - I need to go to Home Depot and pick up some shovels and hoes.

I would do so many dirty things to that blonde on the far left.

If you look closely, you can see the Asian chick to the right getting a little forearm-boob action. Nice.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky+ on August 25, 2007, 11:48:28 AM
You are looking at the only four reasons to go to a Hawks game.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 25, 2007, 12:10:53 PM
Quote from: Slaky+ on August 25, 2007, 11:48:28 AM
You are looking at the only four eight reasons to go to a Hawks game.

Good things/small packages'd
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 25, 2007, 03:39:30 PM
Quote from: StewiesBandwagon on August 25, 2007, 12:10:38 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:36:42 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

That reminds me - I need to go to Home Depot and pick up some shovels and hoes.

I would do so many dirty things to that blonde on the far left.

If you look closely, you can see the Asian chick to the right getting a little forearm-boob action. Nice.

You're strangely picky. All four of those girls are hot hot hot with rock hard bods. When the thirsty man is offered an ice cooler with four different brands of quality beer, he does not waste time in selecting one. He grabs the first one he can get his hands on and drinks from that manna, brutha.

{But if I had to pick, I dig the brunette in the center}
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Simmer on August 25, 2007, 04:33:46 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 25, 2007, 03:39:30 PM
Quote from: StewiesBandwagon on August 25, 2007, 12:10:38 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:36:42 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

That reminds me - I need to go to Home Depot and pick up some shovels and hoes.

I would do so many dirty things to that blonde on the far left.

If you look closely, you can see the Asian chick to the right getting a little forearm-boob action. Nice.

You're strangely picky. All four of those girls are hot hot hot with rock hard bods. When the thirsty man is offered an ice cooler with four different brands of quality beer, he does not waste time in selecting one. He grabs the first one he can get his hands on and drinks from that manna, brutha.

{But if I had to pick, I dig the brunette in the center}


Who's being picky.  The only thing I'd be picky about with that pic is, well, Im'ma keep that private between me and those 4.  We be pickin' all night long.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Tinker to Evers to Chance on August 26, 2007, 12:27:43 AM
Quote from: Simmer on August 25, 2007, 04:33:46 PM
Quote from: The Paul Popovich Experience on August 25, 2007, 03:39:30 PM
Quote from: StewiesBandwagon on August 25, 2007, 12:10:38 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:36:42 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

That reminds me - I need to go to Home Depot and pick up some shovels and hoes.

I would do so many dirty things to that blonde on the far left.

If you look closely, you can see the Asian chick to the right getting a little forearm-boob action. Nice.

You're strangely picky. All four of those girls are hot hot hot with rock hard bods. When the thirsty man is offered an ice cooler with four different brands of quality beer, he does not waste time in selecting one. He grabs the first one he can get his hands on and drinks from that manna, brutha.

{But if I had to pick, I dig the brunette in the center}


Who's being picky.  The only thing I'd be picky about with that pic is, well, Im'ma keep that private between me and those 4.  We be pickin' all night long.
And a grinin'.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 27, 2007, 06:03:32 AM

I think the blonde on the right was in a bangbus video
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Corn-fed on August 27, 2007, 09:15:15 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 27, 2007, 06:03:32 AM

I think the blonde on the right was in a bangbus video

And you recognize her from this angle how?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kwyjibo on August 27, 2007, 03:51:24 PM
Quote from: Corn-fed on August 27, 2007, 09:15:15 AM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 27, 2007, 06:03:32 AM

I think the blonde on the right was in a bangbus video

And you recognize her from this angle how?

I put some yogurt on my monitor.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: rrdego on August 27, 2007, 10:19:51 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=W6OmpkmS9Dw

nope not the wrong group
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: DwightKurtz on August 14, 2008, 10:18:35 PM
Fun facts about Marmol:

Since July 20th, Marmol has gone 13 innings without allowing a run to score.  In that time, he's given up 2 hits, 8 walks, and he's struck out 17.

He's also gone 8.1 innings in a row without surrendering a hit.  In that time, he's walked 3, and he's struck out 12.

One month ago, his ERA was 4.13.

Today, it's 2.89.  In other words, it's dropped 1.24 runs in less than 30 days; in fact, it's taken 19.

Splooge, anybody?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kerm on August 15, 2008, 10:13:40 AM
Quote from: KurtEvans on August 14, 2008, 10:18:35 PM
Fun facts about Marmol:

Since July 20th, Marmol has gone 13 innings without allowing a run to score.  In that time, he's given up 2 hits, 8 walks, and he's struck out 17.

He's also gone 8.1 innings in a row without surrendering a hit.  In that time, he's walked 3, and he's struck out 12.

One month ago, his ERA was 4.13.

Today, it's 2.89.  In other words, it's dropped 1.24 runs in less than 30 days; in fact, it's taken 19.

Splooge, anybody?

So, if I mention he's 2 outs away from a no-hitter right now, does that jinx him?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Andy on August 15, 2008, 10:20:32 AM
I think tonight, when he comes in to pitch, after he gets the second out, Soto should throw his mask in the air, run out and hug him and the whole team should come in jumping up and down.  Even if there are just two out in the eighth and all 19 Marlins fans have no idea what's going on.  It'd just be funny.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kerm on August 15, 2008, 10:25:18 AM
Quote from: KurtEvans on August 15, 2008, 10:19:00 AM
Quote from: Kerm on August 15, 2008, 10:13:40 AM
Quote from: KurtEvans on August 14, 2008, 10:18:35 PM
Fun facts about Marmol:

Since July 20th, Marmol has gone 13 innings without allowing a run to score.  In that time, he's given up 2 hits, 8 walks, and he's struck out 17.

He's also gone 8.1 innings in a row without surrendering a hit.  In that time, he's walked 3, and he's struck out 12.

One month ago, his ERA was 4.13.

Today, it's 2.89.  In other words, it's dropped 1.24 runs in less than 30 days; in fact, it's taken 19.

Splooge, anybody?

So, if I mention he's 2 outs away from a no-hitter right now, does that jinx him?

Douchebag moment: I thought a no-hitter comes from starting a game and going 9 innings without allowing a hit.  /douchebag moment

I don't think it'll jinx him per se, but if we're aware of it and he's aware of it, I'll bet that somebody gets a hit off him the next time he pitches.

Considering what a big deal the Chicago media made of that fat whore Bobby Jenks' "perfect game" (or no-hitter, or whatever the hell it was), I say it counts.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Uncouth Sloth on August 15, 2008, 01:21:30 PM
I'm just glad he's back.  Now we just need to replace Howry. 

(an earnest post, not at all funny).
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: TDubbs on August 15, 2008, 01:39:26 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

Seriously.  Damn.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: powen01 on August 15, 2008, 05:01:43 PM
Quote from: TDubbs on August 15, 2008, 01:39:26 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

Seriously.  Damn.

Are the shovels for all the splooge on the ice?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kerm on August 15, 2008, 05:04:35 PM
Quote from: TDubbs on August 15, 2008, 01:39:26 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on August 24, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: Kwyjibo on August 24, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

I positive ice sluts.

I can't imagine why that would be:

(http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c174/Jenmariko21/Bud-Light-Hats_resizedd.jpg)

Seriously.  Damn.

That is about the only thing that would ever make me want to drink Bud Light.  Or shovel snow.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Oleg on August 15, 2008, 06:53:19 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

What's the over/under on how many have this (http://www.thecheetah.com/aboutus.asp) as their night job?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Cade on August 15, 2008, 11:23:04 PM
Quote from: Oleg on August 15, 2008, 06:53:19 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on August 24, 2007, 01:38:41 PM
Bumping the thread to introduce the Atlanta Thrashers' "Blue Crew."

http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NHLPage&id=13661

A possible cure for anything blue that you might have.

What's the over/under on how many have this (http://www.thecheetah.com/aboutus.asp) as their night job?

Ah, the famous Cheetah.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: DPappy on August 29, 2008, 04:05:25 PM
There were only 5 splooge threads on the main page.  I didn't think that was enough.  Now, there's six.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 04:26:02 PM
Quote from: DPappy on August 29, 2008, 04:05:25 PM
There were only 5 splooge threads on the main page.  I didn't think that was enough.  Now, there's six.

85-50...this team is so good it's retarded.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 29, 2008, 05:19:25 PM
Quote from: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 04:26:02 PM
Quote from: DPappy on August 29, 2008, 04:05:25 PM
There were only 5 splooge threads on the main page.  I didn't think that was enough.  Now, there's six.

85-50...this team is so good it's retarded.

It may be retarded but McCain's No 2 would still choose life for it. Because she's compassionate like that.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: DPappy on August 29, 2008, 06:11:43 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 29, 2008, 05:19:25 PM
Quote from: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 04:26:02 PM
Quote from: DPappy on August 29, 2008, 04:05:25 PM
There were only 5 splooge threads on the main page.  I didn't think that was enough.  Now, there's six.

85-50...this team is so good it's retarded.

It may be retarded but McCain's No 2 would still choose life for it. Because she's compassionate like that.

Zing!
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 07:08:28 PM
RotoWorld, MLB.com and a couple other recaps of the game keep mentioning how the Phils got hosed (well, RotoWorld is the only place so explicit about it) with the ball 4 to Kos-K and Howard being safe at first.  Welke had an absolutely terrible strike zone the whole game, calling pitches for strikes below the ankles.  That pitch to Kos-K was maybe about ankle-high, and he called it a ball.  Finally, the Cubs got a call in their favor.  Then on the play with Howard, none of it would have mattered if on the earlier play that inning (can't remember if it was Utley or Victorino), the Cubs turned two and the first-base ump blew the call.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 29, 2008, 08:00:32 PM
I didn't see much of the game but I know for a fact that the Phillies are bunch of cocksmoking douchesickles with a fat, retarded redneck for a manager and they deserve whatever happens to them. The umps called a pristine game of baseball today as evidenced by the final score. Fuck Phillie and everything it stands for, except for brotherhood and Donovan McNabb.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 29, 2008, 08:01:48 PM
And The Roots.

And DJ Jazzy Jeff.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Andy on August 29, 2008, 08:17:08 PM
That pitch to Kosuke was ball four.

Ryan Howard was safe.

It evens out.

Right?

Ahh, phuck the phillies.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 08:20:21 PM
Quote from: Andy on August 29, 2008, 08:17:08 PM
That pitch to Kosuke was ball four.

Ryan Howard was safe.

It evens out.

Right?

Ahh, phuck the phillies.

Howard was safe, but whoever earlier that inning should have grounded into the DP on the ball Theriot drove into the ground about 30 feet from Lee, was called safe.  THOSE even out.  I'd say Kos-K's called ball 4 evens out all the ridiculous calls Welke was making on balls low and out of the zone from Blanton.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 29, 2008, 09:52:35 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 29, 2008, 08:01:48 PM
And The Roots.

And DJ Jazzy Jeff.

And Gamble & Huff.

And Cheesesteaks.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 09:55:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on August 29, 2008, 09:52:35 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 29, 2008, 08:01:48 PM
And The Roots.

And DJ Jazzy Jeff.

And Gamble & Huff.

And Cheesesteaks.

And Tiny Fey, according to Wikipedia.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Poon on August 29, 2008, 10:00:33 PM
Quote from: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 08:20:21 PM
Quote from: Andy on August 29, 2008, 08:17:08 PM
That pitch to Kosuke was ball four.

Ryan Howard was safe.

It evens out.

Right?

Ahh, phuck the phillies.

Howard was safe, but whoever earlier that inning should have grounded into the DP on the ball Theriot drove into the ground about 30 feet from Lee, was called safe.  THOSE even out.  I'd say Kos-K's called ball 4 evens out all the ridiculous calls Welke was making on balls low and out of the zone from Blanton.

It was bad officiating for both teams.  The breaks we caught got us a run and kept them from getting a run.  Dems da breaks.  Still, getting to one of the better (I won't say best even with their ERA) pens in the league two games in a row should be a huge confidence boost.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 30, 2008, 08:24:21 AM
Quote from: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 09:55:39 PM
Quote from: Fork on August 29, 2008, 09:52:35 PM
Quote from: ~Apex on August 29, 2008, 08:01:48 PM
And The Roots.

And DJ Jazzy Jeff.

And Gamble & Huff.

And Cheesesteaks.

And Tiny Fey, according to Wikipedia. Bill Cosby.

Funny'd.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kerm on September 02, 2008, 01:57:31 PM
Quote from: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 07:08:28 PM
RotoWorld, MLB.com and a couple other recaps of the game keep mentioning how the Phils got hosed (well, RotoWorld is the only place so explicit about it) with the ball 4 to Kos-K and Howard being safe at first.  Welke had an absolutely terrible strike zone the whole game, calling pitches for strikes below the ankles.  That pitch to Kos-K was maybe about ankle-high, and he called it a ball.  Finally, the Cubs got a call in their favor.  Then on the play with Howard, none of it would have mattered if on the earlier play that inning (can't remember if it was Utley or Victorino), the Cubs turned two and the first-base ump blew the call.

I didn't see the game, but this seems pretty fair.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Chuck to Chuck on September 02, 2008, 02:06:25 PM
Quote from: Weebs on August 29, 2008, 07:08:28 PM
RotoWorld, MLB.com and a couple other recaps of the game keep mentioning how the Phils got hosed (well, RotoWorld is the only place so explicit about it) with the ball 4 to Kos-K and Howard being safe at first.  Welke had an absolutely terrible strike zone the whole game, calling pitches for strikes below the ankles.  That pitch to Kos-K was maybe about ankle-high, and he called it a ball.  Finally, the Cubs got a call in their favor.  Then on the play with Howard, none of it would have mattered if on the earlier play that inning (can't remember if it was Utley or Victorino), the Cubs turned two and the first-base ump blew the call.

Damn good thing that there's replay to right those wrongs.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Brownie on June 26, 2009, 05:12:49 PM
The thrill is gone. Go back to Des Moines, or better yet, go back to the Dominican to pitch in front of scouts with Pedro and practice for WBC 2013 so the Dutch can stick a wooden shoe up your ass again.

Kevin Gregg has better control than Marmol.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: MAD on June 26, 2009, 05:19:46 PM
Quote from: Brownie on June 26, 2009, 05:12:49 PM
The thrill is gone. Go back to Des Moines, or better yet, go back to the Dominican to pitch in front of scouts with Pedro and practice for WBC 2013 so the Dutch can stick a wooden shoe up your ass again.

Kevin Gregg Rick Ankiel has better control than Marmol.

Reality bites'd.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Kermit, B. on June 26, 2009, 05:21:08 PM
Is he pitching hurt, or is this all between his gigantic ears?

Also, SeanBearPig is the fucking MAN.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Brownie on June 26, 2009, 05:22:06 PM
Quote from: MAD on June 26, 2009, 05:19:46 PM
Quote from: Brownie on June 26, 2009, 05:12:49 PM
The thrill is gone. Go back to Des Moines, or better yet, go back to the Dominican to pitch in front of scouts with Pedro and practice for WBC 2013 so the Dutch can stick a wooden shoe up your ass again.

Kevin Gregg Rick Ankiel Steve Blass after sniffing Dock Ellis' resin bag has better control than Marmol.

Reality bites'd.

Don't be too generous'd
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: R-V on April 16, 2010, 04:33:51 PM
11 filthy Ks against only 2 BBs in 5.1 IP for the Marmot early on this season. Redbeard can eat a couple handfuls of Slaky's pubes.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Shooter on April 16, 2010, 09:27:26 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 16, 2010, 04:33:51 PM
11 filthy Ks against only 2 BBs in 5.1 IP for the Marmot early on this season. Redbeard can eat a couple handfuls of Slaky's pubes.

Using Marlos with a five run lead against the fucking Sneak Attacks doesn't seem like the way to utilize your resources.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Canadouche on April 16, 2010, 09:29:05 PM
Quote from: Shooter on April 16, 2010, 09:27:26 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 16, 2010, 04:33:51 PM
11 filthy Ks against only 2 BBs in 5.1 IP for the Marmot early on this season. Redbeard can eat a couple handfuls of Slaky's pubes.

Using Marlos with a five run lead against the fucking Sneak Attacks doesn't seem like the way to utilize your resources.

Watch your fucking tongue.  Lou Piniella is a genius and the Cubs are lucky to have him.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Saul Goodman on April 16, 2010, 09:41:41 PM
Quote from: Shooter on April 16, 2010, 09:27:26 PM
Quote from: R-V on April 16, 2010, 04:33:51 PM
11 filthy Ks against only 2 BBs in 5.1 IP for the Marmot early on this season. Redbeard can eat a couple handfuls of Slaky's pubes.

Using Marlos with a five run lead against the fucking Sneak Attacks doesn't seem like the way to utilize your resources.

Actually, Marmol's pitching to be limited, for now! (http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20100416&content_id=9340538&notebook_id=9340578&vkey=notebook_chc&fext=.jsp&c_id=chc)
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Eli on May 27, 2010, 10:10:10 PM
Bump for a guy who's now striking out 18 batters per nine innings.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on May 27, 2010, 11:59:08 PM
Do you think opposing hitters dread the very sight of Larry Rothschild when Marmol's in the game? If somebody is really on their game they can tell us what opposing batters' OBP is before and after Larry's obligatory mound visits in the 9th this year. I that bet shit's pretty stark. 

ALRRY ROTHSCHILD IS TEH TRUTH???

Also:

Sean Bear Pig 2010:

23.1 IP, 13 H, 7 BB (3 IBB), 30 K!

ZOMG!!!
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Saul Goodman on August 15, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.

I didn't say anything about the Battlin' Birdies.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CBStew on August 15, 2010, 07:47:17 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 15, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.

I didn't say anything about the Battlin' Birdies.

Better than "He gone."
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 16, 2010, 11:37:41 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 15, 2010, 07:47:17 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 15, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.

I didn't say anything about the Battlin' Birdies.

Better than "He gone."

There will never be a more glorious Desip thread than the Dead Pool one for Harrelson.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Richard Chuggar on August 16, 2010, 11:50:40 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 16, 2010, 11:37:41 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 15, 2010, 07:47:17 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 15, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.

I didn't say anything about the Battlin' Birdies.

Better than "He gone."

There will never be a more glorious Desip thread than the Dead Pool one for Harrelson.

Maybe for you only b/c you won't be around to experience the joy we will all have when your name is there.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Oleg on August 16, 2010, 11:54:03 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 16, 2010, 11:37:41 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 15, 2010, 07:47:17 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 15, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.

I didn't say anything about the Battlin' Birdies.

Better than "He gone."

There will never be a more glorious Desip thread than the Dead Pool one for Harrelson.

Nothing made me happier than turning on the Sux game yesterday when it was 10-8 in the ninth, just in time to see Detroit tack on a few more runs.  It was even more glorious when Stone explained that the Sux gave up 3 in the top of 8th.  I then realized that Stone was doing the play by play, too.  I was hoping Harrelson hurled himself out of the press box into the seats.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky on August 16, 2010, 12:00:12 PM
Quote from: Oleg on August 16, 2010, 11:54:03 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 16, 2010, 11:37:41 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 15, 2010, 07:47:17 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 15, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.

I didn't say anything about the Battlin' Birdies.

Better than "He gone."

There will never be a more glorious Desip thread than the Dead Pool one for Harrelson.

Nothing made me happier than turning on the Sux game yesterday when it was 10-8 in the ninth, just in time to see Detroit tack on a few more runs.  It was even more glorious when Stone explained that the Sux gave up 3 in the top of 8th.  I then realized that Stone was doing the play by play, too.  I was hoping Harrelson hurled himself out of the press box into the seats.

He needs to step onto 35th and get hit by an AIDS bus.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Quality Start Machine on August 16, 2010, 01:33:35 PM
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on August 16, 2010, 11:50:40 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 16, 2010, 11:37:41 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 15, 2010, 07:47:17 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 15, 2010, 02:00:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 15, 2010, 07:56:53 AM
Quote from: Night Man on August 14, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
Slider, slider, slider, good night.

Thanks, Chip.

I didn't say anything about the Battlin' Birdies.

Better than "He gone."

There will never be a more glorious Desip thread than the Dead Pool one for Harrelson.

Maybe for you only b/c you won't be around to experience the joy we will all have when your name is there.

I just hope I'm here when you shrug your mortal coil due to asphyxiation after huffing HelmetNacho residual fumes after a robust 69 session with ChubbieJulie.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 03, 2012, 05:23:47 PM
He sucks.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 03, 2012, 05:31:51 PM
I used to love watching Marmol pitch.  Now I dread it.  Even last night, when he went 1-2-3 in the 9th, it was utter anguish to watch, as he started out 0-2 on Drew Stubbs and the wet newspaper that Stubbs customarily brings with him to the plate, and then threw three straight balls before getting a borderline called Strike 3.  It sucks that his trade value is pretty much nil, but I don't even care anymore.  Just.  Go.  Away.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Eli on May 03, 2012, 05:56:57 PM
Quote from: PANK! on May 03, 2012, 05:31:51 PM
Just.  Go.  Away.

Oh, he will.

After they pay him $10 million next season to pitch in Chicago or somewhere else. Blurgh.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Armchair_QB on May 03, 2012, 09:24:14 PM
Hey, the Yankees need a closer!
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Saul Goodman on May 04, 2012, 11:39:41 AM
Demoted...

as the closer. Not to Iowa. Not yet.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: PenPho on May 04, 2012, 11:49:51 AM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on May 04, 2012, 11:39:41 AM
Demoted...

as the closer. Not to Iowa. Not yet.

At this time yesterday, my two closers in the Desipio Fantasy League were Mariano Rivera and Carlos Marmol.

Which makes it extra awesome that I already used up all my waiver moves this week on Joe Saunders, Wade Miley and Anthony Bass, who will all likely be gone from my team within 3 weeks.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Quality Start Machine on May 04, 2012, 12:56:02 PM
Quote from: PenPho on May 04, 2012, 11:49:51 AM

At this time yesterday, my two closers in the Desipio Fantasy League were Mariano Rivera and Carlos Marmol.


Never seen anyone use "resemblance to a fruit bat" as criteria before.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Tonker on May 04, 2012, 03:51:47 PM
Quote from: PANK! on May 03, 2012, 05:31:51 PM
I used to love watching Marmol pitch.  Now I dread it don't give a flying fuckEven last night, when he went 1-2-3 in the 9th, it was utter anguish to watch, as he started out 0-2 on Drew Stubbs and the wet newspaper that Stubbs customarily brings with him to the plate, and then threw three straight balls before getting a borderline called Strike 3.  It sucks that his trade value is pretty much nil, but I don't even care anymore.  Just.  Go.  Away.

Doyourselfafavour'd.
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Slaky on May 04, 2012, 07:22:53 PM
How about that Dole East guy?
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: World's #1 Astros Fan on May 04, 2012, 07:49:43 PM
Quote from: Tonker on May 04, 2012, 03:51:47 PM
Quote from: PANK! on May 03, 2012, 05:31:51 PM
I used to love watching Marmol pitch.  Now I dread it don't give a flying fuckEven last night, when he went 1-2-3 in the 9th, it was utter anguish to watch, as he started out 0-2 on Drew Stubbs and the wet newspaper that Stubbs customarily brings with him to the plate, and then threw three straight balls before getting a borderline called Strike 3.  It sucks that his trade value is pretty much nil, but I don't even care anymore.  Just.  Go.  Away.

Doyourselfafavour'd.

If only it were so easy. 
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Gilgamesh on May 04, 2012, 08:18:04 PM
Quote from: Slaky on May 04, 2012, 07:22:53 PM
How about that Dole East guy?

GO BANANA!!!
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: Quality Start Machine on June 19, 2012, 11:14:31 PM
Great night for lip readers (http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=22426197&topic_id=&c_id=chc&tcid=vpp_copy_22426197&v=3).
Title: Re: Carlos Marmol Boing-Stiffy-Splooge
Post by: CBStew on June 20, 2012, 09:20:09 AM
Quote from: Fork on June 19, 2012, 11:14:31 PM
Great night for lip readers (http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=22426197&topic_id=&c_id=chc&tcid=vpp_copy_22426197&v=3).

Did he mean me?