News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: LOST Star Trek  ( 33,831 )

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #75 on: May 21, 2013, 10:21:15 PM »
Well, I personally think this movie blew right past tongue in cheek homage to Wrath of Khan and straight into juvenile, ham-fisted awkward rip off. In short, it was a visually impressive turd pile.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #76 on: May 22, 2013, 08:50:16 AM »
Quote from: SKO on May 21, 2013, 10:21:15 PM
Well, I personally think this movie blew right past tongue in cheek homage to Wrath of Khan and straight into juvenile, ham-fisted awkward rip off. In short, it was a visually impressive turd pile.

First two acts were fine.  But the more you love old Trek, the more you'll probably hate the ending.  I was disappointed. Wife notsomuch.  Eldest Murton was "meh."

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #77 on: May 22, 2013, 11:41:21 AM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 08:50:16 AM
Quote from: SKO on May 21, 2013, 10:21:15 PM
Well, I personally think this movie blew right past tongue in cheek homage to Wrath of Khan and straight into juvenile, ham-fisted awkward rip off. In short, it was a visually impressive turd pile.

First two acts were fine.  But the more you love old Trek, the more you'll probably hate the ending.  I was disappointed. Wife notsomuch.  Eldest Murton was "meh."

I had no beef with the first two acts, but the third act was just awful.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Yeti

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,248
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #78 on: May 22, 2013, 12:06:46 PM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 08:50:16 AM
Quote from: SKO on May 21, 2013, 10:21:15 PM
Well, I personally think this movie blew right past tongue in cheek homage to Wrath of Khan and straight into juvenile, ham-fisted awkward rip off. In short, it was a visually impressive turd pile.

First two acts were fine.  But the more you love old Trek, the more you'll probably hate the ending.  I was disappointed. Wife notsomuch.  Eldest Murton was "meh."

Cause y'all are homosexuals

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #79 on: May 22, 2013, 04:35:54 PM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on March 09, 2012, 11:04:03 AM
Quote from: ChuckD on December 13, 2009, 12:15:09 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on December 13, 2009, 11:56:10 AM
Quote from: R-V on December 13, 2009, 10:24:43 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on July 02, 2009, 11:28:37 PM
This movie kicked all kinds of ass.  Best sci-fi movie I've seen since Serenity.

That. What a fun movie.

I know I'm going to regret this more than Weebs' parents regret finishing their basement...but what are the plot holes Chuck was Chucking about?

How about the entire setup with the Supernova for starters?

Go on...

...

...
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Tinker to Evers to Chance

  • F@#$in' New Guy
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,569
  • Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #80 on: May 22, 2013, 05:41:36 PM »
Quote from: SKO on May 22, 2013, 11:41:21 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 08:50:16 AM
Quote from: SKO on May 21, 2013, 10:21:15 PM
Well, I personally think this movie blew right past tongue in cheek homage to Wrath of Khan and straight into juvenile, ham-fisted awkward rip off. In short, it was a visually impressive turd pile.

First two acts were fine.  But the more you love old Trek, the more you'll probably hate the ending.  I was disappointed. Wife notsomuch.  Eldest Murton was "meh."

I had no beef with the first two acts, but the third act was just awful.

The characters, plot, and villain are all upgrades over the 2009 movie.

The third act didn't work for me, but at least it made sense (again, a nice upgrade over the 2009 movie).

Karl Urban is the balls.
Validated by Thrillho - Vicinity WG543441 on or about 102345AUG08

I don't get this KurtEvans photoshop at all.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #81 on: May 23, 2013, 10:06:57 PM »
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on May 22, 2013, 05:41:36 PM
Quote from: SKO on May 22, 2013, 11:41:21 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on May 22, 2013, 08:50:16 AM
Quote from: SKO on May 21, 2013, 10:21:15 PM
Well, I personally think this movie blew right past tongue in cheek homage to Wrath of Khan and straight into juvenile, ham-fisted awkward rip off. In short, it was a visually impressive turd pile.

First two acts were fine.  But the more you love old Trek, the more you'll probably hate the ending.  I was disappointed. Wife notsomuch.  Eldest Murton was "meh."

I had no beef with the first two acts, but the third act was just awful.

The characters, plot, and villain are all upgrades over the 2009 movie.

The third act didn't work for me, but at least it made sense (again, a nice upgrade over the 2009 movie).

Karl Urban is the balls.

I really hated this movie, but Karl Urban is pretty awesome.
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #82 on: May 24, 2013, 09:00:30 PM »
Can we discuss the film here now, or do I need to use the spoiler tags, etc.?

Because after my initial thoughts last night, I think I'm more conflicted on this movie after reading through some of the critiques, reviews, and polemics.
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Location: Den Haag
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #83 on: June 14, 2013, 04:40:46 PM »
I liked this film a lot.  It was enormous fun.  Discuss *that*.
Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #84 on: June 14, 2013, 04:54:31 PM »
Quote from: Tonker on June 14, 2013, 04:40:46 PM
I liked this film a lot.  It was enormous fun.  Discuss *that*.

Kirk was born in the Bronx, but he's from Long Island.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Yeti

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,248
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #85 on: June 10, 2014, 10:58:57 AM »
Quote from: Tonker on June 14, 2013, 04:40:46 PM
I liked this film a lot.  It was enormous fun.  Discuss *that*.

It's nice not being a fanboy of the old shit so I can actually enjoy this movie. I hope they make 1,000 more to spite TEC/SKO/Chuck/Gil

Tinker to Evers to Chance

  • F@#$in' New Guy
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,569
  • Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #86 on: June 10, 2014, 11:07:30 AM »
Quote from: Yeti on June 10, 2014, 10:58:57 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 14, 2013, 04:40:46 PM
I liked this film a lot.  It was enormous fun.  Discuss *that*.

It's nice not being a fanboy of the old shit so I can actually enjoy this movie. I hope they make 1,000 more to spite TEC/SKO/Chuck/Gil

Even if you aren't a fanboy, nothing that Admiral Robocop does makes any damn sense.
Validated by Thrillho - Vicinity WG543441 on or about 102345AUG08

I don't get this KurtEvans photoshop at all.

Yeti

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,248
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #87 on: June 10, 2014, 11:57:15 AM »
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on June 10, 2014, 11:07:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on June 10, 2014, 10:58:57 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 14, 2013, 04:40:46 PM
I liked this film a lot.  It was enormous fun.  Discuss *that*.

It's nice not being a fanboy of the old shit so I can actually enjoy this movie. I hope they make 1,000 more to spite TEC/SKO/Chuck/Gil

Even if you aren't a fanboy, nothing that Admiral Robocop does makes any damn sense.

It seems as though he was trying to cover up a mistake, and he's evil so he did evil shit.

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #88 on: June 10, 2014, 01:33:13 PM »
Quote from: Yeti on June 10, 2014, 11:57:15 AM
he's evil so he did evil shit.

Yeti is the perfect buyer of shit-for-plotting that's made Kurtzman and Orci the toast of Hollywood.

JD

  • I feel like 30 million dollars.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,725
  • Location: Bryant, AR
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #89 on: June 11, 2014, 09:37:48 PM »
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on June 10, 2014, 11:07:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on June 10, 2014, 10:58:57 AM
Quote from: Tonker on June 14, 2013, 04:40:46 PM
I liked this film a lot.  It was enormous fun.  Discuss *that*.

It's nice not being a fanboy of the old shit so I can actually enjoy this movie. I hope they make 1,000 more to spite TEC/SKO/Chuck/Gil

Even if you aren't a fanboy, nothing that Admiral Robocop does makes any damn sense.

They've got one of those????  I might see this, now.  What movie are we talking about?


Also, I'm still ticked at you guys over "Enlisted" being cancelled.
Can you help me live a little more?  I expect good news.