Author Topic: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl  (Read 4900 times)

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 9128
  • Ape X
    • View Profile
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #30 on: February 07, 2012, 10:23:44 AM »
Carol and I were talking last night, if Brady would have played his entire career in Kansas City or Oakland or a crappier team without Belichick, would he one of the greatest of all time?

I laughed a whole bunch.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 4957
  • SUCCESSFUL MESSIAH
    • View Profile
    • Hire Jim Essian
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #31 on: February 07, 2012, 10:30:33 AM »
She's married to a guy older than me who played soccer in Europe.

He scored 1 time in his career.

Well...

He was a defender and played internationally for Italy. Way to leave out the context, bozo.

Also, they're divorced now so get her, Chuck.

I only use Wiki as my source.

So you've moved past rank speculation? You get a kudos.

I think we'd better start with half a kudos, otherwise he'll get big-headed.
Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.

PenPho

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • ****
  • Posts: 1846
    • View Profile
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #32 on: February 07, 2012, 03:01:11 PM »
Thanks.  By Welkerschadenfreudenboner is still at full-mast.

Well, then today's delivery to Copley Square will probably get you going.

"I use exit numbers because they tell me how many miles are left since they're based off of the molested"

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 5471
  • You can see his stripes but you know hes clean
    • View Profile
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #33 on: February 07, 2012, 03:36:22 PM »
Thanks.  By Welkerschadenfreudenboner is still at full-mast.

Well, then today's delivery to Copley Square will probably get you going.



PWNEDgo.
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

morpheus

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
  • Sad.
    • View Profile
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #34 on: February 07, 2012, 04:34:24 PM »
I don't get that KurtEvans photoshop.

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 5471
  • You can see his stripes but you know hes clean
    • View Profile
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #35 on: February 08, 2012, 10:43:31 AM »
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 7883
    • View Profile
    • Slak's Index
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #36 on: February 10, 2012, 08:54:08 AM »
Sort of related. There was a Manning in the Super Bowl. There is a Manning Face. Now all the logos have a Manning Face.

http://daveartlocker.blogspot.com/2012/02/manning-face.html

The Bears one is incredible.

CT III

  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 3822
  • Killer of men.
    • View Profile
    • Hockeenight
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #37 on: February 10, 2012, 09:14:15 AM »
Sort of related. There was a Manning in the Super Bowl. There is a Manning Face. Now all the logos have a Manning Face.

http://daveartlocker.blogspot.com/2012/02/manning-face.html

The Bears one is incredible.

Wow.  Several of those are, for lack of a better term, very TDubbsesque.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 12210
  • Why I don't go to St. Louis.
    • View Profile
    • HOCKEENIGHT
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #38 on: February 10, 2012, 10:30:48 AM »
Sort of related. There was a Manning in the Super Bowl. There is a Manning Face. Now all the logos have a Manning Face.

http://daveartlocker.blogspot.com/2012/02/manning-face.html

The Bears one is incredible.

That was the best thing I've seen all day.

And I got an email from somebody who had the Ultimate Warrior as their profile picture.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

PenPho

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • ****
  • Posts: 1846
    • View Profile
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #39 on: February 10, 2012, 11:05:57 AM »
Sort of related. There was a Manning in the Super Bowl. There is a Manning Face. Now all the logos have a Manning Face.

http://daveartlocker.blogspot.com/2012/02/manning-face.html

The Bears one is incredible.

Wow.  Several of those are, for lack of a better term, very TDubbsesque.

Well, this one does have a big forehead, if that's what you mean .



"I use exit numbers because they tell me how many miles are left since they're based off of the molested"

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 12210
  • Why I don't go to St. Louis.
    • View Profile
    • HOCKEENIGHT
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #40 on: February 11, 2012, 11:28:02 PM »
New England had the statistically worst defense in the league.  New York was a 9 and 7 regular season team.  On the other hand, the Fiat commercial with the Italian woman in the black and red dress was truly inspirational.

Both teams just had perfect matchups in the playoffs. Not to mention a fuckload of in-game luck.

Manningham gets that throw another 99 times, he never makes that catch.

Having to beat the packers and niners on the road are ideal matchups for any team, that's for sure.
Manningham has made big catches before. He was great all game. But you're probably right.
He had no business making a good catch. He sucks.

They just missed beating the Packers when they were all dinged up during the regular season.

The only surprise in the Niners game was that it was as close as it was.

Manningham doesn't suck - he's not David Tyree or anything. He just picked the right night to have the game of his life.

Fork is telling anyone who will listen that he told us all so about Tom Coughlin.

I hate that fuck more than I hate fat-free cheese, and he's going into the Hall of Fame.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Huey Potatohead

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 4962
  • I HAS OPTOAT
    • View Profile
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #41 on: February 12, 2012, 07:34:15 AM »
New England had the statistically worst defense in the league.  New York was a 9 and 7 regular season team.  On the other hand, the Fiat commercial with the Italian woman in the black and red dress was truly inspirational.

Both teams just had perfect matchups in the playoffs. Not to mention a fuckload of in-game luck.

Manningham gets that throw another 99 times, he never makes that catch.

Having to beat the packers and niners on the road are ideal matchups for any team, that's for sure.
Manningham has made big catches before. He was great all game. But you're probably right.
He had no business making a good catch. He sucks.

They just missed beating the Packers when they were all dinged up during the regular season.

The only surprise in the Niners game was that it was as close as it was.

Manningham doesn't suck - he's not David Tyree or anything. He just picked the right night to have the game of his life.

Fork is telling anyone who will listen that he told us all so about Tom Coughlin.

I hate that fuck more than I hate fat-free cheese, and he's going into the Hall of Fame.

Yeah.  For by doubling the Super Bowl trophy count for the team for which you root.  Ingrate.
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 12210
  • Why I don't go to St. Louis.
    • View Profile
    • HOCKEENIGHT
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #42 on: February 12, 2012, 10:02:43 PM »
New England had the statistically worst defense in the league.  New York was a 9 and 7 regular season team.  On the other hand, the Fiat commercial with the Italian woman in the black and red dress was truly inspirational.

Both teams just had perfect matchups in the playoffs. Not to mention a fuckload of in-game luck.

Manningham gets that throw another 99 times, he never makes that catch.

Having to beat the packers and niners on the road are ideal matchups for any team, that's for sure.
Manningham has made big catches before. He was great all game. But you're probably right.
He had no business making a good catch. He sucks.

They just missed beating the Packers when they were all dinged up during the regular season.

The only surprise in the Niners game was that it was as close as it was.

Manningham doesn't suck - he's not David Tyree or anything. He just picked the right night to have the game of his life.

Fork is telling anyone who will listen that he told us all so about Tom Coughlin.

I hate that fuck more than I hate fat-free cheese, and he's going into the Hall of Fame.

Yeah.  For by doubling the Super Bowl trophy count for the team for which you root.  Ingrate.

Eli. It's all Eli.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 12210
  • Why I don't go to St. Louis.
    • View Profile
    • HOCKEENIGHT
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #43 on: February 13, 2012, 09:40:05 AM »
DPD

Tonk never told us how he liked the game.

TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Tonker

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 4957
  • SUCCESSFUL MESSIAH
    • View Profile
    • Hire Jim Essian
Re: A Super Bowl Thread to Only Discuss the Super Bowl
« Reply #44 on: February 13, 2012, 12:15:37 PM »
DPD

Tonk never told us how he liked the game.



So any fat bloke with a beard looks like me, now?
Your toilet's broken, Dave, but I fixed it.