Today was Big Ten Media Day in downtown Chicago, so it's about time to get one of these started.
Who had 32 mph in the How Fast Can Ron Zook Waterski pool? (http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/4471)
(http://i27.tinypic.com/xcoroz.jpg)
Quote from: Night Man on August 02, 2010, 05:30:05 PM
Today was Big Ten Media Day in downtown Chicago, so it's about time to get one of these started.
Who had 32 mph in the How Fast Can Ron Zook Waterski pool? (http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/4471)
(http://i27.tinypic.com/xcoroz.jpg)
I had the under.
DPD, I know we talked about this once before, but I know we have alot of NIU and UofI alums here, so if anyone wanted to go to that game (9/18/10, 6:30 pm) at Champaign, I could look into getting tickets or a group thing.
The Illini also play SIU on 9/11/10 at 11:00 am too.
Is this where some guy says Purdue sucks and someone else gets butthurt?
Purdue is a team of 22 Theriots with Greg Maddux as their coach
Quote from: Yeti on August 02, 2010, 07:07:17 PM
Purdue is a team of 22 Theriots Todd Walkers with Greg Maddux as their coach
ApexANGER'd
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on August 02, 2010, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Yeti on August 02, 2010, 07:07:17 PM
Purdue is a team of 22 Theriots Todd Walkers with Greg Maddux Matt Murton's pubic hair stylist as their coach
ApexANGER'd
You're not trying hard enough, soldier.
You guys do what you gotta do. Purdue football is the Oasis of Alfonso Soriano's weed-carrying wig brusher.
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here. Now, it's fucking on.
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
I'd prefer it if you weren't advocating yourself to get flipped over.
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
Huey frowning upon someone else's irrational response to sports is something something.
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here my favorite college sports team started losing to Northwestern. Now, it's fucking on.
Reality'd
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 25, 2010, 03:18:29 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
Huey frowning upon someone else's irrational response to sports is something something.
I frown upon people doing all sorts of shit, and the very act of me doing so is irrational. I honestly don't get your nitpicking here.
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 03:31:00 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here my favorite college sports team started losing to Northwestern and I got all butthurt about it. Now, it's fucking on.
Reality'd
Almost forgot where we are.
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 03:31:00 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here my favorite college sports team started losing to Northwestern. Now, it's fucking on.
Reality'd
That's happened once in a blue moon for a long time now. I never got asshurt about it til I saw it happen in person.
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here. Now, it's fucking on.
Yes, this. It's fun to rib a fellow Desipiot. Unless you're planning on going all KNØRT ERVIN on us and throwing a faggy tantrum every time someone makes a joke.
Night Man, he gets it. He knows I went to U of I and he knows that I know that U of I has the worst goddamn football team in the state. I'm the one on the bus full of retards, you see? I'm deflecting the easy criticism because I'm in the position of weakness. I'm being, what's called by some, an internet bully. You see? There's nothing glamorous about what I do.
In Huard's defense, he did liken NU to bus full of retards tipping over. And I lol'd.
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:33:24 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on August 25, 2010, 03:18:29 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
Huey frowning upon someone else's irrational response to sports is something something.
I frown upon people doing all sorts of shit, and the very act of me doing so is irrational. I honestly don't get your nitpicking here.
I wasn't nitpicking anything. I was mostly just noting how not surprised I was at this.
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Murray State's gonna start this season right!
GO RACERS!!!!!!!!
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
Charter member of the Big Ten
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Florida -35
Cradle of Coaches!
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
I know a guy who was actually a Maroon running back in the 1980's. He was no Jay Berwanger.
EL-LES-SHOE!
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 03:40:21 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here. Now, it's fucking on.
Yes, this. It's fun to rib a fellow Desipiot. Unless you're planning on going all KNØRT ERVIN on us and throwing a faggy tantrum every time someone makes a joke.
Night Man, he gets it. He knows I went to U of I and he knows that I know that U of I has the worst goddamn football team in the state. I'm the one on the bus full of retards, you see? I'm deflecting the easy criticism because I'm in the position of weakness. I'm being, what's called by some, an internet bully. You see? There's nothing glamorous about what I do.
We (you, me, BH, Slezak, and Illinois football) are going to be good this year. With young Shitheelface at the helm, this team is going places.
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
So are they cool with you jerking it twice a day to Milton Friedman's portrait in the hallway?
Quote from: R-V on August 26, 2010, 09:10:32 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 03:40:21 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here. Now, it's fucking on.
Yes, this. It's fun to rib a fellow Desipiot. Unless you're planning on going all KNØRT ERVIN on us and throwing a faggy tantrum every time someone makes a joke.
Night Man, he gets it. He knows I went to U of I and he knows that I know that U of I has the worst goddamn football team in the state. I'm the one on the bus full of retards, you see? I'm deflecting the easy criticism because I'm in the position of weakness. I'm being, what's called by some, an internet bully. You see? There's nothing glamorous about what I do.
We (you, me, BH, Slezak, and Illinois football) are going to be good this year. With young Shitheelface at the helm, this team is going places.
Hey, I go to U of I, too, you fuck
...Springfield....
Quote from: R-V on August 26, 2010, 09:10:32 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 03:40:21 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here. Now, it's fucking on.
Yes, this. It's fun to rib a fellow Desipiot. Unless you're planning on going all KNØRT ERVIN on us and throwing a faggy tantrum every time someone makes a joke.
Night Man, he gets it. He knows I went to U of I and he knows that I know that U of I has the worst goddamn football team in the state. I'm the one on the bus full of retards, you see? I'm deflecting the easy criticism because I'm in the position of weakness. I'm being, what's called by some, an internet bully. You see? There's nothing glamorous about what I do.
We (you, me, BH, Slezak, and Illinois football) are going to be good this year. With young Shitheelface at the helm, this team is going places.
You can't go wrong with Nathan Shithouse. Do we have any 30 year old defensive backs this year? Wouldn't seem right without one.
Quote from: R-V on August 26, 2010, 09:10:32 AM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 03:40:21 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 25, 2010, 03:16:27 PM
Quote from: PANK! on August 25, 2010, 03:12:28 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Slaky on August 25, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Quote from: Night Man on August 25, 2010, 02:43:16 PM
Just one week to go... (http://espn.go.com/college-football/schedule)
Go Vandy.
I laughed.
Is Northwestern really worth hating on, Slak? I know U of I's been in the shitter for a long time but...it's Northwestern and we're talking football.
Why don't you go flip over a bus full of retards going to the zoo while you're at it?
They weren't until Night Man got here. Now, it's fucking on.
Yes, this. It's fun to rib a fellow Desipiot. Unless you're planning on going all KNØRT ERVIN on us and throwing a faggy tantrum every time someone makes a joke.
Night Man, he gets it. He knows I went to U of I and he knows that I know that U of I has the worst goddamn football team in the state. I'm the one on the bus full of retards, you see? I'm deflecting the easy criticism because I'm in the position of weakness. I'm being, what's called by some, an internet bully. You see? There's nothing glamorous about what I do.
We (you, me, BH, Slezak, and Illinois football) are going to be good this year. With young Shitheelface at the helm, this team is going places.
Illinois football; where by halftime of the Missouri game you're throwing in the towel for the season.
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Yes.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on August 26, 2010, 09:32:57 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Yes.
Instead of the "Maroons", I propose that they call themselves "The Isotopes".
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 11:06:25 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on August 26, 2010, 09:32:57 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Yes.
Instead of the "Maroons", I propose that they call themselves "The Isotopes".
Or the Mushrooms.
http://www.sportswriters.net/fwaa/news/2010/rice100826.html (http://www.sportswriters.net/fwaa/news/2010/rice100826.html)
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 11:06:25 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on August 26, 2010, 09:32:57 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Yes.
Instead of the "Maroons", I propose that they call themselves "The Isotopes".
Too late. The REAL birthplace of the A-Bomb is already using it.
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on August 26, 2010, 11:58:07 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 11:06:25 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on August 26, 2010, 09:32:57 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Yes.
Instead of the "Maroons", I propose that they call themselves "The Isotopes".
Too late. The REAL birthplace of the A-Bomb is already using it.
The Hiroshima Isotopes?
Quote from: PenPho on August 26, 2010, 12:07:01 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on August 26, 2010, 11:58:07 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 11:06:25 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on August 26, 2010, 09:32:57 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Yes.
Instead of the "Maroons", I propose that they call themselves "The Isotopes".
Too late. The REAL birthplace of the A-Bomb is already using it.
The Hiroshima Isotopes?
Intrepid Reader: Roger Sterling"Too soon?"
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 26, 2010, 12:30:58 PM
Quote from: PenPho on August 26, 2010, 12:07:01 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on August 26, 2010, 11:58:07 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 11:06:25 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on August 26, 2010, 09:32:57 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 26, 2010, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: Fork on August 26, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
Quote from: morpheus on August 26, 2010, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: CBStew on August 25, 2010, 05:57:03 PM
I was going to make a smart-ass comment about rooting for the University of Chicago football team, because when I lived in Chicago there was this elitist pride in the fact that Hutchins had eliminated football at the U of C. But now I find out that football has been back at UC since 1969 so now you guys can make smart-ass comments about how they still don't have football at UC.
When I got my current jorb working for said University I was as surprised as you were to find that the Maroons do in fact have a football program. I found out when I got the email saying I could pick up a free pass to all Maroon home athletic events, including home football games. The pass is apparently good for me and any guests...
Get a brain, Maroons?
Wasn't the A-Bomb developed, at least in part, under the grandstand at the football field?
Yes.
Instead of the "Maroons", I propose that they call themselves "The Isotopes".
Too late. The REAL birthplace of the A-Bomb is already using it.
The Hiroshima Isotopes?
Intrepid Reader: Roger Sterling
"Too soon?!"
Well, as long as we're talking 2010 College Football...
New Richmond QB and former USC Trojan Aaron Corp, said Richmond's level of play was comparable to U.S.C.'s. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/sports/ncaafootball/29richmond.html?_r=1)
The thought of this douchecaboose riding a scooter around our small, serene wooded campus makes me want to go punch Matt Leinart.
Quote from: PenPho on August 30, 2010, 11:18:04 AM
Well, as long as we're talking 2010 College Football...
New Richmond QB and former USC Trojan Aaron Corp, said Richmond's level of play was comparable to U.S.C.'s. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/sports/ncaafootball/29richmond.html?_r=1)
The thought of this douchecaboose riding a scooter around our small, serene wooded campus makes me want to go punch Matt Leinart.
By all means, please do.
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 11:40:40 AM
Quote from: PenPho on August 30, 2010, 11:18:04 AM
Well, as long as we're talking 2010 College Football...
New Richmond QB and former USC Trojan Aaron Corp, said Richmond's level of play was comparable to U.S.C.'s. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/sports/ncaafootball/29richmond.html?_r=1)
The thought of this douchecaboose riding a scooter around our small, serene wooded campus makes me want to go punch Matt Leinart.
By all means, please do.
Who really needs a reason to punch Matt Leinart?
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on August 30, 2010, 03:17:46 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 11:40:40 AM
Quote from: PenPho on August 30, 2010, 11:18:04 AM
Well, as long as we're talking 2010 College Football...
New Richmond QB and former USC Trojan Aaron Corp, said Richmond's level of play was comparable to U.S.C.'s. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/sports/ncaafootball/29richmond.html?_r=1)
The thought of this douchecaboose riding a scooter around our small, serene wooded campus makes me want to go punch Matt Leinart.
By all means, please do.
Who really needs a reason to punch Matt Leinart?
His mom.
QuoteThe Big Ten Conference will announce football division alignments, beginning with the 2011 season, tonight at 7 p.m. ET, the league said in a press release.
Andy Katz of ESPN reports multiple sources have identified the new divisions as: Michigan, Nebraska, Iowa, Michigan State, Northwestern and Minnesota in one division and Ohio State, Penn State, Wisconsin, Purdue, Indiana and Illinois in the other.
Sources also say the divisions were decided upon Monday. Preserving traditional rivalries such as Michigan-Michigan State, Iowa-Minnesota, Purdue-Indiana and Indiana-Illinois were key concerns, Katz reports.
In men's basketball, the sources tell the network the Big Ten will play a 16-game conference schedule, with teams playing the others in their division twice and the teams in the other division once.
Dennis Dodd of CBS has conflicting information, reporting via Twitter: "Latest BREAKING rumor: Mich, OSU in same division. Game moved to earlier in the season."
Nebraska/Iowa will turn into a pretty big rivalry pretty quickly, I'm-a-thinkin'
Quote from: PANK! on September 01, 2010, 03:30:38 PM
Nebraska/Iowa will turn into a pretty big rivalry pretty quickly, I'm-a-thinkin'
Pretty much and it won't be pretty either.
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
While the OSU win was nice, beating a shitty Michigan team by 2 points in not something to crow about.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 05:03:44 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
While the OSU win was nice, beating a shitty Michigan team by 2 points in not something to crow about.
A road win is a road win. Go straight to hell.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Really? Penn State, which has averaged 10 wins a year over the last five years and has had back to back 11 win seasons, is weak? Are you just saying this because they've lost to Iowa twice? I'd kill for Illinois to be so weak as to lose 4 games in two years. Indiana and Illinois are perennial creampuffs, I'll grant that, but Apex's homerism aside, I don't think Purdue's average finish of 5th in an 11 team league over the last ten years makes them "creampuffy."
Quote from: SKO on September 01, 2010, 05:39:53 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Really? Penn State, which has averaged 10 wins a year over the last five years and has had back to back 11 win seasons, is weak? Are you just saying this because they've lost to Iowa twice? I'd kill for Illinois to be so weak as to lose 4 games in two years. Indiana and Illinois are perennial creampuffs, I'll grant that, but Apex's homerism aside, I don't think Purdue's average finish of 5th in an 11 team league over the last ten years makes them "creampuffy."
*scowls, paces menacingly*
Quote from: SKO on September 01, 2010, 05:39:53 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Really? Penn State, which has averaged 10 wins a year over the last five years and has had back to back 11 win seasons, is weak? Are you just saying this because they've lost to Iowa twice? I'd kill for Illinois to be so weak as to lose 4 games in two years. Indiana and Illinois are perennial creampuffs, I'll grant that, but Apex's homerism aside, I don't think Purdue's average finish of 5th in an 11 team league over the last ten years makes them "creampuffy."
De-astigmatismed.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 05:47:08 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 01, 2010, 05:39:53 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Really? Penn State, which has averaged 10 wins a year over the last five years and has had back to back 11 win seasons, is weak? Are you just saying this because they've lost to Iowa twice? I'd kill for Illinois to be so weak as to lose 4 games in two years. Indiana and Illinois are perennial creampuffs, I'll grant that, but Apex's homerism aside, I don't think Purdue's average finish of 5th in an 11 team league over the last ten years makes them "creampuffy."
De-astigmatismed.
Weaker than what, exactly? A 12 win team? A team that's won three of the last 5 conference championships rather than two? Or been to three BCS bowl games rather than two? You've got some ridiculously fucking high standards for excellence if Penn State somehow fails to make the grade.
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
Um, Purdue blows. Fucking Northern beat them two years ago.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
This isn't really about your team, dicknose. Hawk went to Northwestern. He and I get along great.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 06:21:23 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
This isn't really about your team, dicknose. Hawk went to Northwestern. He and I get along great.
And he pokes fun at other teams approximately never. Sometimes I do. In fact, I never did until I saw how enraged you get at the most benign comments about Purdue. Your point?
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:24:41 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 06:21:23 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
This isn't really about your team, dicknose. Hawk went to Northwestern. He and I get along great.
And he pokes fun at other teams approximately never. Sometimes I do. In fact, I never did until I saw how enraged you get at the most benign comments about Purdue. Your point?
You annoy me. Congratulations.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 06:27:01 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:24:41 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 06:21:23 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
This isn't really about your team, dicknose. Hawk went to Northwestern. He and I get along great.
And he pokes fun at other teams approximately never. Sometimes I do. In fact, I never did until I saw how enraged you get at the most benign comments about Purdue. Your point?
You annoy me. Congratulations.
Purdue still sucks.
I guess you'll have to wait and see if they manage to beat Northwestern "of all teams" this year so you'll have better comebacks than ANGER.
Come on, people.
Cancer simply isn't funny.
I like ANGER. Huey gets ANGRY a lot. He and I get along great.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 06:34:37 PM
I like ANGER. Huey gets ANGRY a lot. He and I get along great.
I take it back. ANGER is good.
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:24:41 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 06:21:23 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
This isn't really about your team, dicknose. Hawk went to Northwestern. He and I get along great.
And he pokes fun at other teams approximately never. Sometimes I do. In fact, I never did until I saw how enraged you get at the most benign comments about Purdue. Your point?
I think my Meechigan status has been a deterrent from too much shit talking (not to mention 654 straight losses when I went to the big Purple) and really there aint that much to hate about Purdue (at least compared to the sweatervests and the pink locker rooms), but Pex, your Desipio Overreaction Level is reaching Dolphin Level.
Unfortunately, when this thing went off the rails, it sort of obscured the point that Chuck was trying to make.
Namely, that there is a giant conspiracy against Iowa.
Quote from: CT III on September 01, 2010, 08:18:39 PM
Unfortunately, when this thing went off the rails, it sort of obscured the point that Chuck was trying to make.
Namely, that there is a giant conspiracy against Iowa.
Wait. When did it become unfortunate to obscure Chuck points?
Quote from: thehawk on September 01, 2010, 07:17:45 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:24:41 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 06:21:23 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
This isn't really about your team, dicknose. Hawk went to Northwestern. He and I get along great.
And he pokes fun at other teams approximately never. Sometimes I do. In fact, I never did until I saw how enraged you get at the most benign comments about Purdue. Your point?
I think my Meechigan status has been a deterrent from too much shit talking (not to mention 654 straight losses when I went to the big Purple) and really there aint that much to hate about Purdue (at least compared to the sweatervests and the pink locker rooms), but Pex, your Desipio Overreaction Level is reaching Dolphin Level.
My bad.
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
(http://dubsism.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/danny-hope-1.jpg?w=326&h=449)
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 09:06:10 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
It's over for now. Just wait until Night Man starts talkin mess about IUPUI.
Quote from: R-V on September 01, 2010, 09:50:18 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 09:06:10 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
It's over for now. Just wait until Night Man starts talkin mess about IUPUI.
I'll fucking
find his ass.
Well, it appears that Iowa-Wisconsin every year would put two much stress on two of the top tier programs. So, they gave Iowa the chance to beat Purdue every year.
No grand conspiracy here.
At least against Iowa.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 09:06:10 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
Sorry to hear that, I hope tomorrow is better. No jokes.
Quote from: Night Man on September 02, 2010, 12:58:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 09:06:10 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
Sorry to hear that, I hope tomorrow is better. No jokes.
It will be. *extends arms for (shirtless) hug*
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 09:06:10 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
pussy
Quote from: Night Man on September 02, 2010, 12:58:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 09:06:10 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
Sorry to hear that, I hope tomorrow is better. No jokes.
If you *really* want to get Apex riled, tell him about how overrated Patrick Ewing is.
Quote from: morpheus on September 02, 2010, 08:22:44 AM
Quote from: Night Man on September 02, 2010, 12:58:58 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 09:06:10 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 06:18:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 05:55:13 PM
Quote from: Night Man on September 01, 2010, 05:25:17 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 01, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 01, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
What will the cross-over rivalries be? Guesses here:
Michigan-Ohio State
Iowa-Wisconsin
Illinois-Northwestern
Nebraska-Penn State
And two who cares between Minnesota, Michigan State and Indiana, Purdue.
Ohio State gets off easy. Penn State is weaker (at least until JoePa retires). Perennial cream puffs in Purdue, Indiana and Illinois. And if Michigan keeps it's head up it's ass, there's another win. OSU is looking at 4 or 5 conference wins easily every year for the foreseeable future.
Purdue may not be a national power or anything but they're not a perennial creampuff either. They're quite often top half of the Big Ten. Even last year, a shit year, they finished 4-4 in the conference and knocked off both Michigan and Ohio State. So suck my fuckin dick.
Someday Apex will be telling his grandbabies all about the year Purdue went 4-4 in conference, it was so awesome you guys.
You could tell your grandbabies about your four posts that didn't suck elephant scrotum and you'd be lying out your wrinkled, flaming ass. If you're going to go all TDubbs on my posts all the time, why don't you at least read them first so you don't come off like a less-funny, inconsequential Chuck? I just said that last year was a "shit year" for Purdue. They finished 5-7 under a new head coach and fumble fucked away a game against Northwestern of all teams. Purdue is 57-47 in conference play since Joe Tiller took over 1997 but I guess that's a fucking cream puff.
For someone so fucking stupid, you sure went to an expensive university. Eat shit.
I knew my post had a high probability of leading to butthurtedness, but I wasn't even expecting that. I appreciate the lesson, but there's this thing that fans of opposing sports teams like to do, and it's called giving each other crap about their team. It can be fun. Give it a try some time. This started months ago. You would say something, I would answer, we were so carefree then. Memories.
I'm sorry for acting like a common Kurt. You're ok. I was having a shit day and decided to vent on the interwebs. You can hate me if you want. It's all good. I'll just act like something something or something. You wanted a reaction and I gave you one. It was over the top sure. But hopefully it ends here.
Sorry to hear that, I hope tomorrow is better. No jokes.
If you *really* want to get Apex riled, tell him about how overrated Patrick Ewing is.
Deep down, Apex already knows.
Bears-Vikings tonight!
UCA Bears vs. some team that has a Viking for a mascot, that is.
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
Anywho, I felt sorry for the Pitt kicker after the second one. I could tell he was quite pissed until he noticed that a timeout was called. That must have been a rollercoaster ride for the kid. I did want Utah to win so I was happy. I enjoyed the game. Much better than watching Dan LeFevour and the Bears on the worst "HD" feed known to man.
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 08:43:54 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
Anywho, I felt sorry for the Pitt kicker after the second one. I could tell he was quite pissed until he noticed that a timeout was called. That must have been a rollercoaster ride for the kid. I did want Utah to win so I was happy. I enjoyed the game. Much better than watching Dan LeFevour and the Bears on the worst "HD" feed known to man.
The ESPN feed of the South Cackalacka game wasn't much better.
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 08:43:54 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
The 3rd down call at the end of regulation, playing it "safe" and running the ball, instead of throwing a fade or taking a shot at the back of the end zone and letting one of the big guys go up and get it. Wanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
Wanny plays for the close game...and/or not to lose, which is why his teams inexcusably lose close games like last night or blow big leads when they get em like they did to Cincy last year. He's a good recruiter, but an epically fucking shitty coach and football strategerist.
I'm convinced he's only coached games to be close or not to lose. He's not once actually coached a game to win.
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 08:43:54 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
The 3rd down call at the end of regulation, playing it "safe" and running the ball, instead of throwing a fade or taking a shot at the back of the end zone and letting one of the big guys go up and get it. Wanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
Wanny plays for the close game...and/or not to lose, which is why his teams inexcusably lose close games like last night or blow big leads when they get em like they did to Cincy last year. He's a good recruiter, but an epically fucking shitty coach and football strategerist.
I'm convinced he's only coached games to be close or not to lose. He's not once actually coached a game to win.
Your comment should be up for a "meathead of the year" nomination.
So, when he's won games, what was he doing then?
Because he's won a few games before.
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 08:43:54 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
The 3rd down call at the end of regulation, playing it "safe" and running the ball, instead of throwing a fade or taking a shot at the back of the end zone and letting one of the big guys go up and get it. Wanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
Wanny plays for the close game...and/or not to lose, which is why his teams inexcusably lose close games like last night or blow big leads when they get em like they did to Cincy last year. He's a good recruiter, but an epically fucking shitty coach and football strategerist.
I'm convinced he's only coached games to be close or not to lose. He's not once actually coached a game to win.
Didn't they throw it to that big fucker on second down? And he didn't come down with it? Sunseri was starting in his first game and there were a few decisions of his I wasn't cracked up about. I don't think I'd let him take another shot either. Your team was down 10 points and came back to tie. I'd take my chances in OT... until, oh yea, Sunseri threw a pick.
Also, if he plays for the close game, how did they get one on Cincinnati last year? Also, Utah is a pretty good team. I don't know if I'd say they "inexplicably lost".
Listen, guys... we can argue about strategy and whathaveyou all day long. But the important thing is that we're finally talking about Pittsburgh again.
And I think we can all be thankful for that.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 03, 2010, 09:37:15 AM
Listen, guys... we can argue about strategy and whathaveyou all day long. But the important thing is that we're finally talking about Pittsburgh again.
And I think we can all be thankful for that.
I refuse to take part in anything that might construed as defending Dave Wannestadt.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 03, 2010, 09:37:15 AM
Listen, guys... we can argue about strategy and whathaveyou all day long. But the important thing is that we're finally talking about Pittsburgh again.
And I think we can all be thankful for that.
Fuck, I didn't even connect the dots..
FUCK YOU CFiHP
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AMWanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
When some highly intelligent future civilization digs up the internets and attempts to understand them, this sentence will puzzle them for decades.
I'm kind of butthurt that I don't understand hockey better. Because I assume your hockey analysis would be just as mind-numbingly hilarious as your football analysis.
Quote from: R-V on September 03, 2010, 10:28:23 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AMWanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
When some highly intelligent future civilization digs up the internets and attempts to understand them, this sentence will puzzle them for decades.
I'm kind of butthurt that I don't understand hockey better. Because I assume your hockey analysis would be just as mind-numbingly hilarious as your football analysis.
Football is a simple game to figure out, dummy. It's 11 on 11.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 03, 2010, 10:34:09 AM
Quote from: R-V on September 03, 2010, 10:28:23 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AMWanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
When some highly intelligent future civilization digs up the internets and attempts to understand them, this sentence will puzzle them for decades.
I'm kind of butthurt that I don't understand hockey better. Because I assume your hockey analysis would be just as mind-numbingly hilarious as your football analysis.
Football is a simple game to figure out, dummy. It's 11 on 11.
Unless you're in Canada.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 03, 2010, 11:32:18 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 03, 2010, 10:34:09 AM
Quote from: R-V on September 03, 2010, 10:28:23 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AMWanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
When some highly intelligent future civilization digs up the internets and attempts to understand them, this sentence will puzzle them for decades.
I'm kind of butthurt that I don't understand hockey better. Because I assume your hockey analysis would be just as mind-numbingly hilarious as your football analysis.
Football is a simple game to figure out, dummy. It's 11 on 11.
Unless you're in Canada.
Yea, then it's 27 on 11.
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 11:37:28 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 03, 2010, 11:32:18 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 03, 2010, 10:34:09 AM
Quote from: R-V on September 03, 2010, 10:28:23 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AMWanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
When some highly intelligent future civilization digs up the internets and attempts to understand them, this sentence will puzzle them for decades.
I'm kind of butthurt that I don't understand hockey better. Because I assume your hockey analysis would be just as mind-numbingly hilarious as your football analysis.
Football is a simple game to figure out, dummy. It's 11 on 11.
Unless you're in Canada.
Yea, then it's 27 on 11.
I don't appreciate this post
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on September 03, 2010, 11:46:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 11:37:28 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 03, 2010, 11:32:18 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 03, 2010, 10:34:09 AM
Quote from: R-V on September 03, 2010, 10:28:23 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AMWanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
When some highly intelligent future civilization digs up the internets and attempts to understand them, this sentence will puzzle them for decades.
I'm kind of butthurt that I don't understand hockey better. Because I assume your hockey analysis would be just as mind-numbingly hilarious as your football analysis.
Football is a simple game to figure out, dummy. It's 11 on 11.
Unless you're in Canada.
Yea, then it's 27 on 11.
I don't appreciate this post
You, of all people, should.
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 11:37:28 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 03, 2010, 11:32:18 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 03, 2010, 10:34:09 AM
Quote from: R-V on September 03, 2010, 10:28:23 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AMWanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
When some highly intelligent future civilization digs up the internets and attempts to understand them, this sentence will puzzle them for decades.
I'm kind of butthurt that I don't understand hockey better. Because I assume your hockey analysis would be just as mind-numbingly hilarious as your football analysis.
Football is a simple game to figure out, dummy. It's 11 on 11.
Unless you're in Canada.
Yea, then it's 27 on 11.
The metric system!
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 08:43:54 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
The 3rd down call at the end of regulation, playing it "safe" and running the ball, instead of throwing a fade or taking a shot at the back of the end zone and letting one of the big guys go up and get it. Wanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
Wanny plays for the close game...and/or not to lose, which is why his teams inexcusably lose close games like last night or blow big leads when they get em like they did to Cincy last year. He's a good recruiter, but an epically fucking shitty coach and football strategerist.
I'm convinced he's only coached games to be close or not to lose. He's not once actually coached a game to win.
I'm sure there's plenty of more wrongness in your post, but this calls out like a lighthouse in a storm.
Final Rankings, Total Defense (2009)
Alabama
Nebraska
Florida
Penn St.
Ohio St.
TCU
Oklahoma
Texas
Air Force
Iowa
Of the 10 teams listed above, 8 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 7 of the top 10 and the National Champion.
The two not in the top 25, Oklahoma and Air Force, were both in the "others receiving votes"
Final Rankings, Total Offense (2009)
Boise St.
Houston
TCU
Texas
Nevada
Cincinnati
Oregon
Arkansas
Texas Tech
Stanford
Of the 10 teams listed above, 6 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 4 of the top 10.
Of the 4 not in the top 25, only one (Arkansas) was in the "others receiving votes".
Quote from: PenPho on September 03, 2010, 03:32:08 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 08:43:54 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
The 3rd down call at the end of regulation, playing it "safe" and running the ball, instead of throwing a fade or taking a shot at the back of the end zone and letting one of the big guys go up and get it. Wanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
Wanny plays for the close game...and/or not to lose, which is why his teams inexcusably lose close games like last night or blow big leads when they get em like they did to Cincy last year. He's a good recruiter, but an epically fucking shitty coach and football strategerist.
I'm convinced he's only coached games to be close or not to lose. He's not once actually coached a game to win.
I'm sure there's plenty of more wrongness in your post, but this calls out like a lighthouse in a storm.
Final Rankings, Total Defense (2009)
Alabama
Nebraska
Florida
Penn St.
Ohio St.
TCU
Oklahoma
Texas
Air Force
Iowa
Of the 10 teams listed above, 8 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 7 of the top 10 and the National Champion.
The two not in the top 25, Oklahoma and Air Force, were both in the "others receiving votes"
Final Rankings, Total Offense (2009)
Boise St.
Houston
TCU
Texas
Nevada
Cincinnati
Oregon
Arkansas
Texas Tech
Stanford
Of the 10 teams listed above, 6 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 4 of the top 10.
Of the 4 not in the top 25, only one (Arkansas) was in the "others receiving votes".
Yea, well this was the conventional thought before people actually started looking at those pesky stats and facts.
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 04:30:40 PM
Quote from: PenPho on September 03, 2010, 03:32:08 PM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 03, 2010, 09:18:30 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 03, 2010, 08:43:54 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on September 02, 2010, 11:30:06 PM
Dave Wannstedt has yet to play to win a game in his coaching career.
Huh?
The 3rd down call at the end of regulation, playing it "safe" and running the ball, instead of throwing a fade or taking a shot at the back of the end zone and letting one of the big guys go up and get it. Wanny never has played to blow teams out or win by a wide margin. He only plays to be in a close game. He wasn't even good at that in the NFL. But to win in college, offense matters a lot more than defense. If the other team is good, you can win a shootout...and if they aren't, you don't risk losing because it's a blowout.
Wanny plays for the close game...and/or not to lose, which is why his teams inexcusably lose close games like last night or blow big leads when they get em like they did to Cincy last year. He's a good recruiter, but an epically fucking shitty coach and football strategerist.
I'm convinced he's only coached games to be close or not to lose. He's not once actually coached a game to win.
I'm sure there's plenty of more wrongness in your post, but this calls out like a lighthouse in a storm.
Final Rankings, Total Defense (2009)
Alabama
Nebraska
Florida
Penn St.
Ohio St.
TCU
Oklahoma
Texas
Air Force
Iowa
Of the 10 teams listed above, 8 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 7 of the top 10 and the National Champion.
The two not in the top 25, Oklahoma and Air Force, were both in the "others receiving votes"
Final Rankings, Total Offense (2009)
Boise St.
Houston
TCU
Texas
Nevada
Cincinnati
Oregon
Arkansas
Texas Tech
Stanford
Of the 10 teams listed above, 6 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 4 of the top 10.
Of the 4 not in the top 25, only one (Arkansas) was in the "others receiving votes".
Yea, well this was the conventional thought before people actually started looking at those pesky stats and facts.
What about the all important ratio of games played to win vs. games played to not lose vs. games played to be close.
Because Wannstedt is at 0:5:7 there.
That ratio is dead center of the "bullshit toleration" zone.
Quote from: PenPho on September 03, 2010, 03:32:08 PM
I'm sure there's plenty of more wrongness in your post, but this calls out like a lighthouse in a storm.
Final Rankings, Total Defense (2009)
Alabama
Nebraska
Florida
Penn St.
Ohio St.
TCU
Oklahoma
Texas
Air Force
Iowa
Of the 10 teams listed above, 8 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 7 of the top 10 and the National Champion.
The two not in the top 25, Oklahoma and Air Force, were both in the "others receiving votes"
Final Rankings, Total Offense (2009)
Boise St.
Houston
TCU
Texas
Nevada
Cincinnati
Oregon
Arkansas
Texas Tech
Stanford
Of the 10 teams listed above, 6 of them were in the final AP top 25, including 4 of the top 10.
Of the 4 not in the top 25, only one (Arkansas) was in the "others receiving votes".
[/quote]
If you look at the lists, it's good to be a defense in conferences with no top offenses...and it's good to be an offense outside of the SEC, Big Ten, and largely, the Big 12. Could it be that the causality runs such that the good defenses in the SEC and Big Ten depress offensive stats enough? Or could it be that those defenses are playing some pretty shitty offenses? It probably runs both ways.
But to refine my point--if you want to compete against the teams on the top defenses list, matching their defenses isn't going to be the answer. Going about things the Boise St. way and stacking up on offense is. If you aren't an elite program, trying to build a stifling defense isn't the answer--coming up with an offense that can score a ton is your best path to the top.
Nathan Scheelhaase is black!?!
Quote from: CBStew on August 30, 2010, 06:21:39 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on August 30, 2010, 03:17:46 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 11:40:40 AM
Quote from: PenPho on August 30, 2010, 11:18:04 AM
Well, as long as we're talking 2010 College Football...
New Richmond QB and former USC Trojan Aaron Corp, said Richmond's level of play was comparable to U.S.C.'s. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/sports/ncaafootball/29richmond.html?_r=1)
The thought of this douchecaboose riding a scooter around our small, serene wooded campus makes me want to go punch Matt Leinart.
By all means, please do.
Who really needs a reason to punch Matt Leinart?
His mom.
Now available as a punching bag for birthdays and bar mitzvahs. (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5531595)
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 04, 2010, 01:48:57 PM
Quote from: CBStew on August 30, 2010, 06:21:39 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on August 30, 2010, 03:17:46 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on August 30, 2010, 11:40:40 AM
Quote from: PenPho on August 30, 2010, 11:18:04 AM
Well, as long as we're talking 2010 College Football...
New Richmond QB and former USC Trojan Aaron Corp, said Richmond's level of play was comparable to U.S.C.'s. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/sports/ncaafootball/29richmond.html?_r=1)
The thought of this douchecaboose riding a scooter around our small, serene wooded campus makes me want to go punch Matt Leinart.
By all means, please do.
Who really needs a reason to punch Matt Leinart?
His mom.
Now available as a punching bag for birthdays and bar mitzvahs. (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5531595)
I knew my decision to become a meatball Derek Anderson fan last week would pay off.
Cutting edge, baby.
BOISE STATE! BOISE STATE! Fuck all the naysayers
Quality work by the Big 10 crew tonight. Never seen a block in the back waved off before.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 06, 2010, 10:39:44 PM
Quality work by the Big 10 crew tonight. Never seen a block in the back waved off before.
Don't watch much football?
Quote from: Yeti on September 06, 2010, 10:47:40 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 06, 2010, 10:39:44 PM
Quality work by the Big 10 crew tonight. Never seen a block in the back waved off before.
Don't watch much football?
All the time. Never seen that before. Especially on one like that.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 06, 2010, 11:12:26 PM
All the time. Never seen that before. Especially on one like that.
I actually saw one Friday night. However, from what I recall of that play tonight, the guy fell on his ass. And last time I checked, when you get pushed in the back, you don't fall on your ass. Now, this might be something new where that happens, in which case, this world is passing me by. I recall hands being on the guy's side, which does happen to be legal
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
Not if Boise and TCU are undefeated
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
If Iowa goes undefeated beating Wisconsin, Penn State, Michigan and Ohio State, they will be in the BCS title game.
That said, my point was to point out who voted for James Madison.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:43:25 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
If Iowa goes undefeated beating Wisconsin, Penn State, Michigan and Ohio State, they will be in the BCS title game.
That said, my point was to point out who voted for James Madison.
I know that was your point. I didn't think you were agitating. I was just going to throw that out there anyway. Given the fact that I didn't and still don't feel that they deserved it last year. But this year, yes.
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:43:25 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
If Iowa goes undefeated beating Wisconsin, Penn State, Michigan and Ohio State, they will be in the BCS title game.
That said, my point was to point out who voted for James Madison.
What if they go undefeated and don't beat those guys?
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 08:39:24 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
Not if Boise and TCU are undefeated
Boise and TCU should be ineligible for a title game forever until they stop being bitches. Fuck them.
Iowa is awesome, I don't care who hears me. Yes, I am an Illinois fan but I'll be damned if I don't respect the hell out of Iowa football. Those kids just beat the shit out of people. That defense is awesome. I hope they win the conference.
Quote from: Slaky on September 13, 2010, 09:33:51 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 08:39:24 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
Not if Boise and TCU are undefeated
Boise and TCU should be ineligible for a title game forever until they stop being bitches. Fuck them.
I was waiting for you to jump at that one. BRONKOZZZZZZZZZZ!
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 09:35:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 13, 2010, 09:33:51 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 08:39:24 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
Not if Boise and TCU are undefeated
Boise and TCU should be ineligible for a title game forever until they stop being bitches. Fuck them.
I was waiting for you to jump at that one. BRONKOZZZZZZZZZZ!
Their one legitimate win was completely shattered by the glorious and always accurate transitive property of college football. Thank you James Madison!
Quote from: Slaky on September 13, 2010, 09:35:57 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 09:35:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 13, 2010, 09:33:51 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 08:39:24 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
Not if Boise and TCU are undefeated
Boise and TCU should be ineligible for a title game forever until they stop being bitches. Fuck them.
I was waiting for you to jump at that one. BRONKOZZZZZZZZZZ!
Their one legitimate win was completely shattered by the glorious and always accurate transitive property of college football. Thank you James Madison!
Yea, well when they beat 'Bama in Glendale, you'll be eating your words. I will seek vindication for sticking with the Mid-Majors. I will
Quote from: Slaky on September 13, 2010, 09:35:57 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 09:35:09 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 13, 2010, 09:33:51 AM
Quote from: Yeti on September 13, 2010, 08:39:24 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 13, 2010, 08:37:18 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on September 13, 2010, 08:33:05 AM
James Madison should be ranked (http://m.yahoo.com/w/ysportshome/home/news/article?offset=5&urn=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cap%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Carticle%2Cap-t25-collegefbpoll%3A1&.ts=1284328122&.intl=US&.lang=en):
James Madison received 11 points in this week's poll, landing on the ballots of two voters -- Ray Ratto of Comcast SportsNet Bay Area in California and Jon Wilner of the San Jose Mercury News.
Yeah that happened with Appalachian State after they beat Michigan. It's a political statement against polling, or some ghey shit like that. I will throw this out there to appease people: Iowa has a really good football team, and with the shifting balance of power in the college world, they may actually deserve to go to a title game if undefeated.
Not if Boise and TCU are undefeated
Boise and TCU should be ineligible for a title game forever until they stop being bitches. Fuck them.
I was waiting for you to jump at that one. BRONKOZZZZZZZZZZ!
Their one legitimate win was completely shattered by the glorious and always accurate transitive property of college football. Thank you James Madison!
LOL at Boise State's BCS bid. ELL OH ELL.
If the first two serieseses are any indicator, Illinois is going to beat Northern by 1200 points. This should be fun to look back on in three hours or so.
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
And they hold on. Muhsin is really pushing the line that Ron Zook is trying to establish a new identity at Illinois. How long has he been there again?
Quote from: Night Man on September 18, 2010, 02:21:55 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
And they hold on. Muhsin is really pushing the line that Ron Zook is trying to establish a new identity at Illinois. How long has he been there again?
Eleventeen years. The running game looks good but they still suck. NIU isn't very good - or at least they weren't against Iowa State. And Iowa State is trash.
The Big Ten schedule looks like it's going to be a real challenge once again. That's being very polite.
Iowa shitting the bed in spectacular fashion in Tucson tonight.
Fucking college football.
Mark Dantonio has brass fucking balls.
Now Arizona is shitting the bed.
27-27 with eight minutes to go.
Quote from: JD on September 19, 2010, 08:54:51 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 18, 2010, 11:14:23 PM
Mark Dantonio has brass fucking balls.
That was awesome.
It was incredible. Imagine the reaction if that play had failed in East Lansing? At home to throw caution to the wind like that is not something you see too often.
And how about Ryan Mallett's massive armcock? This guy is the shit.
Unlike Jake Locker - who is just shit.
Quote from: Slaky on September 19, 2010, 10:49:49 AM
And how about Ryan Mallett's massive armcock? This guy is the shit.
Unlike Jake Locker - who is just shit.
ARMCOCKANSAS! But yeah, he's the balls. He needs to tone it down a notch and let Andrew Luck either take the top spot or hope that Locker can improve, because one of them needs to be the sacrificial lamb at the #1 spot. Mallett deserves better than Buffalo.
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 08:23:42 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 19, 2010, 10:49:49 AM
And how about Ryan Mallett's massive armcock? This guy is the shit.
Unlike Jake Locker - who is just shit.
ARMCOCKANSAS! But yeah, he's the balls. He needs to tone it down a notch and let Andrew Luck either take the top spot or hope that Locker can improve, because one of them needs to be the sacrificial lamb at the #1 spot. Mallett deserves better than Buffalo.
Everyone deserves better than Buffalo.
Quote from: Slaky on September 20, 2010, 08:48:16 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 08:23:42 AM
Quote from: Slaky on September 19, 2010, 10:49:49 AM
And how about Ryan Mallett's massive armcock? This guy is the shit.
Unlike Jake Locker - who is just shit.
ARMCOCKANSAS! But yeah, he's the balls. He needs to tone it down a notch and let Andrew Luck either take the top spot or hope that Locker can improve, because one of them needs to be the sacrificial lamb at the #1 spot. Mallett deserves better than Buffalo.
Everyone deserves better than Buffalo.
Ehh. They'll probably just draft another runningback they don't need and wonder why they don't automatically score points despite a shitty o-line, a shitty quarterback, a shitty head coach, and shitty receivers.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Mallett got a drinking ticket in college, so he's Ryan Leaf. What else about him troubles you? His transfer from Michigan? I can't imagine why a 6'8'' pure pocket passer would refuse to stay there and sit the bench in a spread-option offense.
Ponder is a nice prospect, but his effort against Oklahoma was barely better than Locker's miserable outing against Nebraska. Locker has the best pure skills of anyone in this draft, but he played in a Wing T in high school and is in only his second year in a pro-style offense. He's worth taking, but he'll need a year or two.
Luck would probably be the one the scouts would have the fewest questions about, but his upside isn't as high as Mallett's. Mallett is far, far more accurate than Leaf ever was in college and is way less turnover prone than Ponder, Luck, or Locker, and Petrino's offense is closer to an NFL offense than anything the others have run.
Kaepernick has put up those numbers in the pistol while playing against WAC opponents. I've never been all that impressed with his pro-possibilities. Jeff Rowe drew some buzz when he was at Nevada as well, but he quickly disappeared once he got to an NFL training camp.
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
I suppose 6' 7"/238 lb. QBs with trobbing armcocks basically grow on trees.
Armcock trees aside, though, is he at least good enough to be on your list of players you
would get near with Joe Francis' cock (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7039.msg193730#msg193730)? Or does this whole 'drinking alcohol' thing entail an automatic demotion?
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 12:05:41 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Mallett got a drinking ticket in college, so he's Ryan Leaf. What else about him troubles you? His transfer from Michigan? I can't imagine why a 6'8'' pure pocket passer would refuse to stay there and sit the bench in a spread-option offense.
Ponder is a nice prospect, but his effort against Oklahoma was barely better than Locker's miserable outing against Nebraska. Locker has the best pure skills of anyone in this draft, but he played in a Wing T in high school and is in only his second year in a pro-style offense. He's worth taking, but he'll need a year or two.
Luck would probably be the one the scouts would have the fewest questions about, but his upside isn't as high as Mallett's. Mallett is far, far more accurate than Leaf ever was in college and is way less turnover prone than Ponder, Luck, or Locker, and Petrino's offense is closer to an NFL offense than anything the others have run.
Kaepernick has put up those numbers in the pistol while playing against WAC opponents. I've never been all that impressed with his pro-possibilities. Jeff Rowe drew some buzz when he was at Nevada as well, but he quickly disappeared once he got to an NFL training camp.
This doesn't tell me what to think about the Illini.
Tell me what I need to know before I go to the Illinois - Ohio State game, please?
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 20, 2010, 01:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 12:05:41 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Mallett got a drinking ticket in college, so he's Ryan Leaf. What else about him troubles you? His transfer from Michigan? I can't imagine why a 6'8'' pure pocket passer would refuse to stay there and sit the bench in a spread-option offense.
Ponder is a nice prospect, but his effort against Oklahoma was barely better than Locker's miserable outing against Nebraska. Locker has the best pure skills of anyone in this draft, but he played in a Wing T in high school and is in only his second year in a pro-style offense. He's worth taking, but he'll need a year or two.
Luck would probably be the one the scouts would have the fewest questions about, but his upside isn't as high as Mallett's. Mallett is far, far more accurate than Leaf ever was in college and is way less turnover prone than Ponder, Luck, or Locker, and Petrino's offense is closer to an NFL offense than anything the others have run.
Kaepernick has put up those numbers in the pistol while playing against WAC opponents. I've never been all that impressed with his pro-possibilities. Jeff Rowe drew some buzz when he was at Nevada as well, but he quickly disappeared once he got to an NFL training camp.
This doesn't tell me what to think about the Illini.
Tell me what I need to know before I go to the Illinois - Ohio State game, please?
2-1... That's 8-4. BOWL GAME
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 20, 2010, 01:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 12:05:41 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Mallett got a drinking ticket in college, so he's Ryan Leaf. What else about him troubles you? His transfer from Michigan? I can't imagine why a 6'8'' pure pocket passer would refuse to stay there and sit the bench in a spread-option offense.
Ponder is a nice prospect, but his effort against Oklahoma was barely better than Locker's miserable outing against Nebraska. Locker has the best pure skills of anyone in this draft, but he played in a Wing T in high school and is in only his second year in a pro-style offense. He's worth taking, but he'll need a year or two.
Luck would probably be the one the scouts would have the fewest questions about, but his upside isn't as high as Mallett's. Mallett is far, far more accurate than Leaf ever was in college and is way less turnover prone than Ponder, Luck, or Locker, and Petrino's offense is closer to an NFL offense than anything the others have run.
Kaepernick has put up those numbers in the pistol while playing against WAC opponents. I've never been all that impressed with his pro-possibilities. Jeff Rowe drew some buzz when he was at Nevada as well, but he quickly disappeared once he got to an NFL training camp.
This doesn't tell me what to think about the Illini.
Tell me what I need to know before I go to the Illinois - Ohio State game, please?
....You can comfort yourself after the blow out by claiming the refs favored Ohio State. 'Cuz they totally do, man.
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 03:25:02 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 20, 2010, 01:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 12:05:41 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Mallett got a drinking ticket in college, so he's Ryan Leaf. What else about him troubles you? His transfer from Michigan? I can't imagine why a 6'8'' pure pocket passer would refuse to stay there and sit the bench in a spread-option offense.
Ponder is a nice prospect, but his effort against Oklahoma was barely better than Locker's miserable outing against Nebraska. Locker has the best pure skills of anyone in this draft, but he played in a Wing T in high school and is in only his second year in a pro-style offense. He's worth taking, but he'll need a year or two.
Luck would probably be the one the scouts would have the fewest questions about, but his upside isn't as high as Mallett's. Mallett is far, far more accurate than Leaf ever was in college and is way less turnover prone than Ponder, Luck, or Locker, and Petrino's offense is closer to an NFL offense than anything the others have run.
Kaepernick has put up those numbers in the pistol while playing against WAC opponents. I've never been all that impressed with his pro-possibilities. Jeff Rowe drew some buzz when he was at Nevada as well, but he quickly disappeared once he got to an NFL training camp.
This doesn't tell me what to think about the Illini.
Tell me what I need to know before I go to the Illinois - Ohio State game, please?
....You can comfort yourself after the blow out by claiming the refs favored Ohio State. 'Cuz they totally do, man.
Yes, that is going to be the difference in that game. I'll tell myself this when it's 48-0 at halftime.
Quote from: Slaky on September 20, 2010, 03:32:10 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 03:25:02 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 20, 2010, 01:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 12:05:41 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Mallett got a drinking ticket in college, so he's Ryan Leaf. What else about him troubles you? His transfer from Michigan? I can't imagine why a 6'8'' pure pocket passer would refuse to stay there and sit the bench in a spread-option offense.
Ponder is a nice prospect, but his effort against Oklahoma was barely better than Locker's miserable outing against Nebraska. Locker has the best pure skills of anyone in this draft, but he played in a Wing T in high school and is in only his second year in a pro-style offense. He's worth taking, but he'll need a year or two.
Luck would probably be the one the scouts would have the fewest questions about, but his upside isn't as high as Mallett's. Mallett is far, far more accurate than Leaf ever was in college and is way less turnover prone than Ponder, Luck, or Locker, and Petrino's offense is closer to an NFL offense than anything the others have run.
Kaepernick has put up those numbers in the pistol while playing against WAC opponents. I've never been all that impressed with his pro-possibilities. Jeff Rowe drew some buzz when he was at Nevada as well, but he quickly disappeared once he got to an NFL training camp.
This doesn't tell me what to think about the Illini.
Tell me what I need to know before I go to the Illinois - Ohio State game, please?
....You can comfort yourself after the blow out by claiming the refs favored Ohio State. 'Cuz they totally do, man.
Yes, that is going to be the difference in that game. I'll tell myself this when it's 48-0 at halftime.
The system works.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 20, 2010, 01:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 20, 2010, 12:05:41 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 18, 2010, 12:35:00 PM
I am very impressed by the Illini thus far, especially against as decent of a team as Northern Illinois is.
More Mikel Leshoure please.
Leshoure runs damn hard, I will say that for him.
I'm going to buy futures in Christian Ponder as the best NFL QB in this bunch...with Luck being right behind him. Locker's mechanics bother me...and Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
The other guy I remain intrigued by is Colin Kaepernick. The cat is listed at 6'6"...and so while he throws from a low slot, I don't know if he has to be quite as mechanically perfect as a 6'3" or 6'4" guy who would just sit back in the pocket. His arm and sick speed would be damn intriguing to me as a GM if I thought I could improve his mechanics and maybe speed up his release a little. I'm not saying he's a first rounder...but he might be worth a fourth-round flier. He can probably keep himself busy returning kicks or playing slot in the interim.
As far as pure skill, this should be a very good QB class.
Mallett got a drinking ticket in college, so he's Ryan Leaf. What else about him troubles you? His transfer from Michigan? I can't imagine why a 6'8'' pure pocket passer would refuse to stay there and sit the bench in a spread-option offense.
Ponder is a nice prospect, but his effort against Oklahoma was barely better than Locker's miserable outing against Nebraska. Locker has the best pure skills of anyone in this draft, but he played in a Wing T in high school and is in only his second year in a pro-style offense. He's worth taking, but he'll need a year or two.
Luck would probably be the one the scouts would have the fewest questions about, but his upside isn't as high as Mallett's. Mallett is far, far more accurate than Leaf ever was in college and is way less turnover prone than Ponder, Luck, or Locker, and Petrino's offense is closer to an NFL offense than anything the others have run.
Kaepernick has put up those numbers in the pistol while playing against WAC opponents. I've never been all that impressed with his pro-possibilities. Jeff Rowe drew some buzz when he was at Nevada as well, but he quickly disappeared once he got to an NFL training camp.
This doesn't tell me what to think about the Illini.
Tell me what I need to know before I go to the Illinois - Ohio State game, please?
I'll be there suffering through the blowout as well. So there's that.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 20, 2010, 12:35:57 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
I suppose 6' 7"/238 lb. QBs with trobbing armcocks basically grow on trees.
Armcock trees aside, though, is he at least good enough to be on your list of players you would get near with Joe Francis' cock (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7039.msg193730#msg193730)? Or does this whole 'drinking alcohol' thing entail an automatic demotion?
Holy shit, no horse is ever dead enough for you, is it?
As far as my remark about Mallett...not much secret that he was a complete screw-off when he was at Michigan. If I were a GM right now (2 games into his Junior season), I'd have some reservations about him if this were a conversation about my franchise QB. It's the same type of thing that was being said about not just Leaf, but well published about JaMarcus Russell during their time in college.
I'll sacrifice a little arm to have a more certainty upstairs. You can choose to do otherwise in your interwebz NFL GM role. If he has a Miguel Cabrera type season in the NFL at some point, I'll eat more crow.
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 21, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 20, 2010, 12:35:57 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
I suppose 6' 7"/238 lb. QBs with trobbing armcocks basically grow on trees.
Armcock trees aside, though, is he at least good enough to be on your list of players you would get near with Joe Francis' cock (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7039.msg193730#msg193730)? Or does this whole 'drinking alcohol' thing entail an automatic demotion?
Holy shit, no horse is ever dead enough for you, is it?
No, sir.
Honestly, I don't really give two shits about college football.
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 21, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 20, 2010, 12:35:57 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
I suppose 6' 7"/238 lb. QBs with trobbing armcocks basically grow on trees.
Armcock trees aside, though, is he at least good enough to be on your list of players you would get near with Joe Francis' cock (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7039.msg193730#msg193730)? Or does this whole 'drinking alcohol' thing entail an automatic demotion?
Holy shit, no horse is ever dead enough for you, is it?
As far as my remark about Mallett...not much secret that he was a complete screw-off when he was at Michigan. If I were a GM right now (2 games into his Junior season), I'd have some reservations about him if this were a conversation about my franchise QB. It's the same type of thing that was being said about not just Leaf, but well published about JaMarcus Russell during their time in college.
I'll sacrifice a little arm to have a more certainty upstairs. You can choose to do otherwise in your interwebz NFL GM role. If he has a Miguel Cabrera type season in the NFL at some point, I'll eat more crow.
I'm going to need some kind of link or something about this alleged screw-off and his screw off behavior at Michigan. Because I'll certainly base my imaginary #1 overall pick on what he did as an 18 year old back up. Or maybe I'll base it on the fact that his completion percentage has skyrocketed with his experience, his arm is ungodly, and unlike the wildly emotional and easily flapped Ryan Leaf, Mallett is praised over and over for his composure and cool in the pocket. He's nothing like Leaf. Leaf's completion percentage in college was 53%. He was never, ever, no matter how god damn immature or mature he was, going to be accurate enough to survive in the NFL. Mallett has raised his completion % from 43.3% in very limited time as a freshman to 55.8% last year to 70.0% this year. Luck is arguably worthy of the #1 spot because he's played in a pro system, is accurate, and has a great edge when it comes to mobility, but the team that passes on Mallett for maturity reasons deserves a special place in NFL purgatory.
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
I enjoy their demise as much as anyone, but those teams have too much talent to get the top 5-10 draft pick that will put them in a position for Mallett. I'm sticking by my 6-10 prediction for the Vikings (Ol' SKO doesn't look so crazy now does he? Sure, ye' laughed at him. Just like ye' laughed when he said pine cones were the future!). The Cowboys will get back in the race only to blow it in hilarious fashion.
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 07:32:43 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
I enjoy their demise as much as anyone, but those teams have too much talent to get the top 5-10 draft pick that will put them in a position for Mallett. I'm sticking by my 6-10 prediction for the Vikings (Ol' SKO doesn't look so crazy now does he? Sure, ye' laughed at him. Just like ye' laughed when he said pine cones were the future!). The Cowboys will get back in the race only to blow it in hilarious fashion.
Well, I was just making teh funny. Of course Minnesota and Dallas won't pick in the top 10. It is possible that both pick ahead of Arizona though, because that team also has a fair amount of talent - and a tough situation under center. I could see Arizona flat-out tanking the season though whereas Minny and Dallas are going balls out for the Wild Cards and coming up lame.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Not THI. We need a another 8-10 years of Tony Romo wearing the blue star. My favorite QB since Danny White.
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:02:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Not THI. We need a another 8-10 years of Tony Romo wearing the blue star. My favorite QB since Danny White.
Romo's had some out and out flops against the Giants, but he's still 5-4 against them overall with a 94.3 QB rating and a 16-10 TD-INT ratio. You're sure you wouldn't just rather face Quincy Carter or Chad Hutchinson again?
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:02:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Not THI. We need a another 8-10 years of Tony Romo wearing the blue star. My favorite QB since Danny White.
Romo's had some out and out flops against the Giants, but he's still 5-4 against them overall with a 94.3 QB rating and a 16-10 TD-INT ratio. You're sure you wouldn't just rather face Quincy Carter or Chad Hutchinson again?
when he flames out, he does it in breathtaking fashion. I positive.
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:24:43 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:02:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Not THI. We need a another 8-10 years of Tony Romo wearing the blue star. My favorite QB since Danny White.
Romo's had some out and out flops against the Giants, but he's still 5-4 against them overall with a 94.3 QB rating and a 16-10 TD-INT ratio. You're sure you wouldn't just rather face Quincy Carter or Chad Hutchinson again?
when he flames out, he does it in breathtaking fashion. I positive.
Fair enough. Split stats are a handy tool. They can tell you, for instance, why PenFoe hates Jay Cutler:
Jay vs. Steelers: 2-0, 49/67 (73.1%), 484 yds, 5 tds, 2 ints, 7.22 YPA, 105.6 Rating, 4 rushes, 40 yards.
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:32:19 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:24:43 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:02:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Not THI. We need a another 8-10 years of Tony Romo wearing the blue star. My favorite QB since Danny White.
Romo's had some out and out flops against the Giants, but he's still 5-4 against them overall with a 94.3 QB rating and a 16-10 TD-INT ratio. You're sure you wouldn't just rather face Quincy Carter or Chad Hutchinson again?
when he flames out, he does it in breathtaking fashion. I positive.
Fair enough. Split stats are a handy tool. They can tell you, for instance, why PenFoe hates Jay Cutler:
Jay vs. Steelers: 2-0, 49/67 (73.1%), 484 yds, 5 tds, 2 ints, 7.22 YPA, 105.6 Rating, 4 rushes, 40 yards.
And zero bathroom rapes.
Quote from: Slaky on September 22, 2010, 09:01:46 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:32:19 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:24:43 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:02:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Not THI. We need a another 8-10 years of Tony Romo wearing the blue star. My favorite QB since Danny White.
Romo's had some out and out flops against the Giants, but he's still 5-4 against them overall with a 94.3 QB rating and a 16-10 TD-INT ratio. You're sure you wouldn't just rather face Quincy Carter or Chad Hutchinson again?
when he flames out, he does it in breathtaking fashion. I positive.
Fair enough. Split stats are a handy tool. They can tell you, for instance, why PenFoe hates Jay Cutler:
Jay vs. Steelers: 2-0, 49/67 (73.1%), 484 yds, 5 tds, 2 ints, 7.22 YPA, 105.6 Rating, 4 rushes, 40 yards.
And zero bathroom rapes.
Only because there's consent.
Quote from: Slaky on September 22, 2010, 09:01:46 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:32:19 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:24:43 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 22, 2010, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: Fork on September 22, 2010, 08:02:41 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 22, 2010, 07:24:06 AM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 21, 2010, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 11:18:05 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 10:29:58 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 21, 2010, 09:05:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 21, 2010, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 08:01:55 PM
Oh and Ryan Leaf jumped to the NFL the second he was eligible. Ryan Mallett was likely going to be the number one pick if he jumped (lot fewer questions than Bradford's broken shoulder) but he chose to stay in order to graduate and possibly get Arkansas a shot at the national title. I'm not one for sap stories, but I'd somehow think he shows a bit more maturity by passing on 50 million in guaranteed money than the guy who told NFL scouts that his first move after becoming the #1 pick would be to go to Vegas.
In some circles, passing on 50 million dollars would seem all kinds of retarded. But not in SKO's world.
It's called character jerk. The kid promised his momma he was gonna get a degree in phys ed and he's gonna do it.
Hell I think it was a stupid move after what happened to Bradford. Maybe he just didn't want to play for the Rams. Might point is that he seems pretty far from the half-witted bag of douche that was Ryan Leaf. My point is that if he was the drunken moran that LDA thinks he is I'd bet he'd have taken the damn money.
I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to Ryan Leaf and I'm on the record as a big fan of Armcock Mallett. I just find it funny that some people think it's honorable to turn down 50 million dollars. Fuck a long career. I'll take the 50 mildo.
I would too. I'd also go to Vegas after being the number one pick. I wouldn't spend a God damn minute studying game film and I would throw around money like it was nothing and go to bed every night buried somewhere in a pile of supermodels. Then I'd play like Leaf or JaMarcus. I don't have an armcock, sadly, and I'm only 5'10'', so I'm never going to be in that position. Therefore I can call those who do that lazy, worthless sonsabitches who threw away a golden opportunity while climbing up on my soapbox and giving props to Ryan Mallett for something that only matters to "people that play the game the right way." I have totally forgotten my point. Either way, any dumbfuck that needs a quarterback and passes on Ryan Mallett will deeply regret it.
I can't wait for the Cardinals to fuck that up.
There are quite a few teams out there that may be worse than Arizona and need quarterbacks. Jacksonville. Oakland. Buffalo. Cleveland.
Minnesota. Dallas.
Not THI. We need a another 8-10 years of Tony Romo wearing the blue star. My favorite QB since Danny White.
Romo's had some out and out flops against the Giants, but he's still 5-4 against them overall with a 94.3 QB rating and a 16-10 TD-INT ratio. You're sure you wouldn't just rather face Quincy Carter or Chad Hutchinson again?
when he flames out, he does it in breathtaking fashion. I positive.
Fair enough. Split stats are a handy tool. They can tell you, for instance, why PenFoe hates Jay Cutler:
Jay vs. Steelers: 2-0, 49/67 (73.1%), 484 yds, 5 tds, 2 ints, 7.22 YPA, 105.6 Rating, 4 rushes, 40 yards.
And zero bathroom rapes.
Intrepid Reader: PenFoeTotally mature that we can't just objectively discuss how Cutler sucks (despite all of the evidence to the contrary and the fact that this whole argument exists solely because I suffer from horrible Chuck-like confirmation bias over a hatred toward a player I formed for no apparent reason while he played for a "rival" of my team but then I hated him more for demanding a trade from that team after the team...umm...tried to trade him...but those rivals whom I hate are classy and it was totally wrong of him to do that so I hate him even more) without someone bringing up Roethlisberger. Real mature.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 21, 2010, 07:53:59 PM
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Nah, quite far from it. A few of the natives can attest to me drinking a significant amount of overpriced pilsner at a Hawks game a couple of years back.
Quote from: SKO on September 21, 2010, 07:54:17 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 21, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 20, 2010, 12:35:57 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 20, 2010, 11:58:24 AM
Mallett just reminds me a bit too much of Ryan Leaf to have any confidence about what he will turn out to be. Besides the public intoxication thing, there's some other stuff out there that would trouble me if I were a GM.
I suppose 6' 7"/238 lb. QBs with trobbing armcocks basically grow on trees.
Armcock trees aside, though, is he at least good enough to be on your list of players you would get near with Joe Francis' cock (http://www.desipio.com/messageboard/index.php?topic=7039.msg193730#msg193730)? Or does this whole 'drinking alcohol' thing entail an automatic demotion?
Holy shit, no horse is ever dead enough for you, is it?
As far as my remark about Mallett...not much secret that he was a complete screw-off when he was at Michigan. If I were a GM right now (2 games into his Junior season), I'd have some reservations about him if this were a conversation about my franchise QB. It's the same type of thing that was being said about not just Leaf, but well published about JaMarcus Russell during their time in college.
I'll sacrifice a little arm to have a more certainty upstairs. You can choose to do otherwise in your interwebz NFL GM role. If he has a Miguel Cabrera type season in the NFL at some point, I'll eat more crow.
I'm going to need some kind of link or something about this alleged screw-off and his screw off behavior at Michigan. Because I'll certainly base my imaginary #1 overall pick on what he did as an 18 year old back up. Or maybe I'll base it on the fact that his completion percentage has skyrocketed with his experience, his arm is ungodly, and unlike the wildly emotional and easily flapped Ryan Leaf, Mallett is praised over and over for his composure and cool in the pocket. He's nothing like Leaf. Leaf's completion percentage in college was 53%. He was never, ever, no matter how god damn immature or mature he was, going to be accurate enough to survive in the NFL. Mallett has raised his completion % from 43.3% in very limited time as a freshman to 55.8% last year to 70.0% this year. Luck is arguably worthy of the #1 spot because he's played in a pro system, is accurate, and has a great edge when it comes to mobility, but the team that passes on Mallett for maturity reasons deserves a special place in NFL purgatory.
DPD bulletin.
You take Mallett, I'll take Ponder...let's catch up in three or four seasons and see where we're at. In some form, this will be decided.
You're tossing stats at me, when that's not what concerns me about Mallett. I also know that college stats don't really translate all that well to the NFL, which is a point that's made every single year at draft time by just about any scout or "expert" who opines on how they try to separate QB1 from QB2.
And my goal isn't, and hasn't been to change your mind. You like Ryan Mallett and that's OK.
I like Nate Scheelhaase. First round material written all over him.
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 21, 2010, 07:53:59 PM
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Nah, quite far from it. A few of the natives can attest to me drinking a significant amount of overpriced pilsner at a Hawks game a couple of years back.
Oh yeah! Man, I was wasted. If I recall, that was the Friday game after which a couple of us went of to Shitty's for the Annual JO-fest. I believe we started of the evening drinking at TDubbs's. Was that the game?
Quote from: Oleg on September 22, 2010, 01:48:14 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 21, 2010, 07:53:59 PM
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Nah, quite far from it. A few of the natives can attest to me drinking a significant amount of overpriced pilsner at a Hawks game a couple of years back.
Oh yeah! Man, I was wasted. If I recall, that was the Friday game after which a couple of us went of to Shitty's for the Annual JO-fest. I believe we started of the evening drinking at TDubbs's. Was that the game?
I believe that is correct...I didn't get the memo about going to TDubbs and I met you guys at United Center. And yes, you were definitely wasted...but Mike D and I were mildly
aroused amused by it.
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:51:47 PM
Quote from: Oleg on September 22, 2010, 01:48:14 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 21, 2010, 07:53:59 PM
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Nah, quite far from it. A few of the natives can attest to me drinking a significant amount of overpriced pilsner at a Hawks game a couple of years back.
Oh yeah! Man, I was wasted. If I recall, that was the Friday game after which a couple of us went of to Shitty's for the Annual JO-fest. I believe we started of the evening drinking at TDubbs's. Was that the game?
I believe that is correct...I didn't get the memo about going to TDubbs and I met you guys at United Center. And yes, you were definitely wasted...but Mike D and I were mildly aroused amused by it.
Was that the same year IGH Murray wanted to be everyone's best friend?
Quote from: Bort on September 22, 2010, 01:53:47 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:51:47 PM
Quote from: Oleg on September 22, 2010, 01:48:14 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 21, 2010, 07:53:59 PM
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Nah, quite far from it. A few of the natives can attest to me drinking a significant amount of overpriced pilsner at a Hawks game a couple of years back.
Oh yeah! Man, I was wasted. If I recall, that was the Friday game after which a couple of us went of to Shitty's for the Annual JO-fest. I believe we started of the evening drinking at TDubbs's. Was that the game?
I believe that is correct...I didn't get the memo about going to TDubbs and I met you guys at United Center. And yes, you were definitely wasted...but Mike D and I were mildly aroused amused by it.
Was that the same year IGH Murray wanted to be everyone's best friend?
Maybe
Quote from: Bort on September 22, 2010, 01:53:47 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:51:47 PM
Quote from: Oleg on September 22, 2010, 01:48:14 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 21, 2010, 07:53:59 PM
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Nah, quite far from it. A few of the natives can attest to me drinking a significant amount of overpriced pilsner at a Hawks game a couple of years back.
Oh yeah! Man, I was wasted. If I recall, that was the Friday game after which a couple of us went of to Shitty's for the Annual JO-fest. I believe we started of the evening drinking at TDubbs's. Was that the game?
I believe that is correct...I didn't get the memo about going to TDubbs and I met you guys at United Center. And yes, you were definitely wasted...but Mike D and I were mildly aroused amused by it.
Was that the same year IGH Murray wanted to be everyone's best friend?
Yes.
Also, the officials did everything to give the Hawks the game but they still lost in OT to the Rangers.
Quote from: PANK! on September 22, 2010, 03:03:32 PM
Quote from: Bort on September 22, 2010, 01:53:47 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:51:47 PM
Quote from: Oleg on September 22, 2010, 01:48:14 PM
Quote from: Lance Dicksons Arm on September 22, 2010, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 21, 2010, 07:53:59 PM
I mostly just enjoy dredging up old bullshit that new bullshit reminds me of (and was additionally curious about whether you're some sort of teetotaler or something).
Nah, quite far from it. A few of the natives can attest to me drinking a significant amount of overpriced pilsner at a Hawks game a couple of years back.
Oh yeah! Man, I was wasted. If I recall, that was the Friday game after which a couple of us went of to Shitty's for the Annual JO-fest. I believe we started of the evening drinking at TDubbs's. Was that the game?
I believe that is correct...I didn't get the memo about going to TDubbs and I met you guys at United Center. And yes, you were definitely wasted...but Mike D and I were mildly aroused amused by it.
Was that the same year IGH Murray wanted to be everyone's best friend?
Yes.
Also, the officials did everything to give the Hawks the game but they still lost in OT to the Rangers.
And afterward some dude whipped out his weinis in the parking lot to take a leak - much to the
delight disgust of TPex and LFork.
QuoteDPD bulletin.
You take Mallett, I'll take Ponder...let's catch up in three or four seasons and see where we're at. In some form, this will be decided.
You're tossing stats at me, when that's not what concerns me about Mallett. I also know that college stats don't really translate all that well to the NFL, which is a point that's made every single year at draft time by just about any scout or "expert" who opines on how they try to separate QB1 from QB2.
And my goal isn't, and hasn't been to change your mind. You like Ryan Mallett and that's OK.
This isn't necessarily true. Some stats do translate. Before the spread offense you could typically rely on completion% as a good indicator of what a quarterback is capable of. For a player like Mallett in a pro style offense it's still fairly reliable. If a guy completes 53% in college, he's not going to do much better in the NFL. If a guy completes less than 50% of his passes in 3/4 college seasons,it's probably really fucking retarded for Brian Billick to draft him (//http://), which I called even as an 8th grader. JaMarcus was a pretty inaccurate guy with a % in the low 50% before Gary Crowton took over and installed the spread. YPA is also helpful in some cases, as Tim Couch's numbers at Kentucky looked pretty good until you realize that 70% of his attempts traveled last than 7 yards in the air his last year there.
Looking at the 1st rd picks who've gone bust the last few years or so (Russell, Quinn, Leinart, Alex Smith (maybe changing, but definitely up to this point), JP Losman, Grossman, Boller) the things that plagued these guys were all pretty apparent in college if people bothered to look. Russell actually Did have the rumors you've fabricated about The Glorious Armcock of Ryan Mallett's maturity, and he was, as I said, not very accurate until the spread arrived to inflate his numbers.
Quinn and Leinart had really shitty arm strength and people dismissed those because they were "NFL Ready", aka "They Played at a Big School in a Pro Style Offense and Were on National TV Alot."
Smith played in as pure of a spread offense as you can find and wasn't at all ready for the transition to the NFL by the time he was thrown into the mix his rookie year (even Drew Brees took 3 years to adapt).
Boller couldn't complete a pass to save his life and only went high because he threw 28 TDs his senior year and he could throw it through the goalpost from his knees at 50 yards away and Brian Billick had a boner for his arm that reason could not sway.
JP Losman completed less than 60% of his passes even in the spread and averaged less than 7.0 YPA for his career. He also threw 14 picks in Conference USA his last year, so that should have been a bit of a red flag.
Rex Grossman, well...he threw a lot of picks, if you can believe that. Like a lot of them, and his senior year he completed just 57% with only a 22-17 TD to INT ratio.
Based on those qualifications I'd say that Mallett, unless his accuracy regresses back to under 60% once he gets deeper into conference play, is the right guy. He's played in a pro-style offense, his arm strength is ungodly, his pocket presence is very impressive, and he doesn't turn the ball over anywhere near as much as ponder. Ponder has a way lower YPA (7.2 to 8.7) and way more interceptions (14 INTs in 644 attempts for a 2.2 INT% vs. 25 ints in 729 attempts for a 3.4 INT%). Ponder's also suffered a season ending injury already. I can see an argument for Luck, because he turns the ball over even less than Mallett, has an even better YPA average, and is more mobile, but not Ponder. But sure, I'll take your bet. You take Ponder, I'll take Mallett, you'll buy me a drink sometime in the future and we'll agree that Mallett is better and the 2015 version of Penfoe is still a wrongheaded asshole.
I realize you've said you aren't trying to change my mind. That's fine. But QB draft talk is like cocaine to me.
Stay classy Tucson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I)
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 23, 2010, 08:59:05 PM
Stay classy Tucson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I)
Fuck Arizona on multiple levels.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 23, 2010, 08:59:05 PM
Stay classy Tucson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I)
Nice job by that usher with her back turned to the shoving, screaming match going on right behind her.
Quote from: Kermit IV on September 23, 2010, 11:46:21 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 23, 2010, 08:59:05 PM
Stay classy Tucson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I)
Nice job by that usher with her back turned to the shoving, screaming match going on right behind her.
D'ur.
Ushers don't have the authority to check people's papers in Arizona.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 23, 2010, 11:54:40 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on September 23, 2010, 11:46:21 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 23, 2010, 08:59:05 PM
Stay classy Tucson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Q4GQTp18I)
Nice job by that usher with her back turned to the shoving, screaming match going on right behind her.
D'ur. Ushers don't have the authority to check people's papers in Arizona.
I was at the game... the ushers looked like they feared for their lives in my section. They were replaced by cops about halfway through the first quarter in my section, where the Iowa fans outnumbered the Arizona fans and it was much calmer than what was in the video. The walk back to the car after the game was an adventure... you'd think that Arizona won by 72 points to continue their twelve year unbeaten streak.
But wait, there's more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsSyjwP7AdI
I just think it figures that I spend all year last year battling the Iowa mongoloids only for them to win 10 straight or whatever to start the season while this year I give them a tepid endorsement and That happens.
Quote from: SKO on September 24, 2010, 10:11:52 PM
I just think it figures that I spend all year last year battling the Iowa mongoloids only for them to win 10 straight or whatever to start the season while this year I give them a tepid endorsement and That happens.
Sounds like a fun family reunion.
Quote from: CT III on September 24, 2010, 10:48:27 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 24, 2010, 10:11:52 PM
I just think it figures that I spend all year last year battling the Iowa mongoloids only for them to win 10 straight or whatever to start the season while this year I give them a tepid endorsement and That happens.
Sounds like a fun family reunion.
I'd try to argue but, sadly, my mother's side of the family does indeed hold it's reunions in Iowa. You win. Have your moment.
Quote from: SKO on September 24, 2010, 11:24:20 PM
Quote from: CT III on September 24, 2010, 10:48:27 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 24, 2010, 10:11:52 PM
I just think it figures that I spend all year last year battling the Iowa mongoloids only for them to win 10 straight or whatever to start the season while this year I give them a tepid endorsement and That happens.
Sounds like a fun family reunion.
I'd try to argue but, sadly, my mother's side of the family does indeed hold it's reunions in Iowa. You win. Have your moment.
Well shit, I'm already drunk.
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
Damn straight. And Michigan just lost Denard Robinson. Michigan's misfortune is always worth laughing at. Even if Denard is a badass.
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
Damn straight. And Michigan just lost Denard Robinson. Michigan's misfortune is always worth laughing at. Even if Denard is a badass.
He's fine. So go ahead and laugh away.
Quote from: flannj on September 25, 2010, 01:29:06 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
Damn straight. And Michigan just lost Denard Robinson. Michigan's misfortune is always worth laughing at. Even if Denard is a badass.
He's fine. So go ahead and laugh away.
He really does make me shelf my Michigan haterade to an extent. 1419 total yards in 3 1/2 half games is ungodly, no matter who you're playing.
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 02:02:15 PM
Quote from: flannj on September 25, 2010, 01:29:06 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
Damn straight. And Michigan just lost Denard Robinson. Michigan's misfortune is always worth laughing at. Even if Denard is a badass.
He's fine. So go ahead and laugh away.
He really does make me shelf my Michigan haterade to an extent. 1419 total yards in 3 1/2 half games is ungodly, no matter who you're playing.
If you need something to laugh at there's always Michigan's defense.
Quote from: flannj on September 25, 2010, 02:08:43 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 02:02:15 PM
Quote from: flannj on September 25, 2010, 01:29:06 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
Damn straight. And Michigan just lost Denard Robinson. Michigan's misfortune is always worth laughing at. Even if Denard is a badass.
He's fine. So go ahead and laugh away.
He really does make me shelf my Michigan haterade to an extent. 1419 total yards in 3 1/2 half games is ungodly, no matter who you're playing.
If you need something to laugh at there's always Michigan's defense.
That's 60 minutes of guffaw every Saturday.
Armcock for Heisman.
ProTip: Do not GIS Armcock.
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 02:16:19 PM
Quote from: flannj on September 25, 2010, 02:08:43 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 02:02:15 PM
Quote from: flannj on September 25, 2010, 01:29:06 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
Damn straight. And Michigan just lost Denard Robinson. Michigan's misfortune is always worth laughing at. Even if Denard is a badass.
He's fine. So go ahead and laugh away.
He really does make me shelf my Michigan haterade to an extent. 1419 total yards in 3 1/2 half games is ungodly, no matter who you're playing.
If you need something to laugh at there's always Michigan's defense.
That's 60 minutes of guffaw every Saturday.
Obviously they can score and score a lot. And it was nice to see them do it with a variety of players today (yes I know it was only BG).
But any opposing offensive coordinator that plays them only has to look at the UMass game to figure out how to pick Michigan's defense apart.
A few more tosses like that and it won't be long before I'm writing Jay Cutler/Ryan Mallett slash fiction with armcocks throbbing with passion.
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
That's all well and good for you and SKO, but what's a poor Tonker to do?
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 25, 2010, 03:19:36 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
That's all well and good for you and SKO, but what's a poor Tonker to do?
What's wrong with him? *drinks sugar-filled glass of scotch*
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 25, 2010, 03:19:36 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on September 25, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 12:06:12 PM
Sorry Pex. I think our Boilermakers just suck. I'm just going to quote Chris from SmartFootball.com (https://twitter.com/smartfootball/status/25513792964): "
I'm kind of shocked by what a bad QB Robert Marve is. Purdue isn't a good team but usually has a decent QB. Marve erratic, undisciplined."
At least we have the Bears!
That's all well and good for you and SKO, but what's a poor Tonker to do?
Knuckle. Children.
Fayetteville is going to burn tonight.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 04:51:58 PM
Fayetteville is going to burn tonight.
Probably, either way.
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 04:51:58 PM
Fayetteville is going to burn tonight.
Probably, either way.
I've never been there, but judging from the bits of Arkansas I have been through, well, no one will notice anyway.
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 04:58:26 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 04:51:58 PM
Fayetteville is going to burn tonight.
Probably, either way.
I've never been there, but judging from the bits of Arkansas I have been through, well, no one will notice anyway.
Actually, Fayetteville is in the only really nice part of the state. Northwest Arkansas is where all the money in the state lives.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 04:59:47 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 04:58:26 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 04:51:58 PM
Fayetteville is going to burn tonight.
Probably, either way.
I've never been there, but judging from the bits of Arkansas I have been through, well, no one will notice anyway.
Actually, Fayetteville is in the only really nice part of the state. Northwest Arkansas is where all the money in the state lives.
It's no Blytheville, that's for sure. What a hole.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 04:59:47 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 04:58:26 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 04:51:58 PM
Fayetteville is going to burn tonight.
Probably, either way.
I've never been there, but judging from the bits of Arkansas I have been through, well, no one will notice anyway.
Actually, Fayetteville is in the only really nice part of the state.
Whatever. Illinois is a hole.
God dammit. Three minutes to be a fucking hero, Mallett. YOU OWE ME THIS. NO ONE WILL LOVE YOUR RIGHT ARM LIKE I CAN.
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
So he rifles the 7 yard out route over the receivers head but can't put enough oomph behind a ball he's throwing away. Fack. Have fun in Buffalo, you heartbreaker.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
Million dollar arm, 25 dollar control tower.
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/roster/_/id/57/florida-gators (http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/roster/_/id/57/florida-gators)
Do I know what rhetorical means!?
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:08:38 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/roster/_/id/57/florida-gators (http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/roster/_/id/57/florida-gators)
Well done.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 06:08:18 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
Million dollar arm, 25 dollar control tower.
That makes 12 interceptions in 17 games. He had a bad game against the nation's best defense and one that actually knows how to use the Cover 2 defense the way it was intended to be used. He sucked eggs, but this was the exception, not the rule. We'll see how he performs the rest of the year. This could very well be their only loss.
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 06:12:31 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 06:08:18 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
Million dollar arm, 25 dollar control tower.
That makes 12 interceptions in 17 games. He had a bad game against the nation's best defense and one that actually knows how to use the Cover 2 defense the way it was intended to be used. He sucked eggs, but this was the exception, not the rule. We'll see how he performs the rest of the year. This could very well be their only loss.
DPD. Just go ahead and add Ryan Mallett to my unabashed apologist resume. Put it below Jay Cutler somewhere near the crossed out Rex Grossman.
A minor setback in the Armcock for Heisman campaign.
*I don't really care, I just wanted to type Armcock.
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 06:19:30 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 06:12:31 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 06:08:18 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
Million dollar arm, 25 dollar control tower.
That makes 12 interceptions in 17 games. He had a bad game against the nation's best defense and one that actually knows how to use the Cover 2 defense the way it was intended to be used. He sucked eggs, but this was the exception, not the rule. We'll see how he performs the rest of the year. This could very well be their only loss.
DPD. Just go ahead and add Ryan Mallett to my unabashed apologist resume. Put it below Jay Cutler somewhere near the crossed out Rex Grossman.
I'm beginning to think that SKO is not the brilliant football analyst I thought he was.
Looks like it's Fro Dog again for me.
Quote from: CT III on September 25, 2010, 06:55:23 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 06:19:30 PM
Quote from: SKO on September 25, 2010, 06:12:31 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 06:08:18 PM
Quote from: Slaky on September 25, 2010, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: JD on September 25, 2010, 06:02:15 PM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 05:53:46 PM
Ryan Mallett's not very smart.
He's got a chinstrap beard and walks around wearing straight-billed ballcaps and velvet jumpsuits. That was known before the game started.
Right. I'm waiting for the list of cons.
Million dollar arm, 25 dollar control tower.
That makes 12 interceptions in 17 games. He had a bad game against the nation's best defense and one that actually knows how to use the Cover 2 defense the way it was intended to be used. He sucked eggs, but this was the exception, not the rule. We'll see how he performs the rest of the year. This could very well be their only loss.
DPD. Just go ahead and add Ryan Mallett to my unabashed apologist resume. Put it below Jay Cutler somewhere near the crossed out Rex Grossman.
I'm beginning to think that SKO is not the brilliant football analyst I thought he was.
Looks like it's Fro Dog again for me.
I've freely admitted that a nice throbbing armcock will sometimes dull my perception of reality. I still think Mallett is legit though. Even with the turnovers, 350 yards against Alabama is impressive. He's salvageable.
One word......
UCLA
That's an acronym.
West Virginia at LSU had to set some sort of record for redneckery, right?
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 11:29:40 PM
That's an acronym initialism.
Pedantic gets what pedantic wants'd
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on September 26, 2010, 08:10:10 AM
Quote from: Armchair_QB on September 25, 2010, 11:29:40 PM
That's an acronym initialism.
Pedantic gets what pedantic wants'd
And I've been calling
her Crandall it an alphabetism all this time!
Texas sucks.
The refs love Ohio State.
LSU has set an NCAA record by winning 5 straight games despite not even putting an offense on the field.
Denard Robinson is averaging 382 total ypg by himself and that's with him missing 3 quarters against Bowling Green. I don't think I've ever seen a player be so successful despite being the only threat on his entire team on either side of the ball.
Nobody gives a shit about Notre Dame or Boston College. Suck on that, ya dirty papists.
Those are my thoughts on college football today. Thank you.
Quote from: SKO on October 02, 2010, 06:50:31 PM
Denard Robinson is averaging 382 total ypg by himself and that's with him missing 3 quarters against Bowling Green. I don't think I've ever seen a player be so successful despite being the only threat on his entire team on either side of the ball.
Adrian Claybourne's going to give him an anal fissure in two weeks. No homo.
(Hopefully)
Les Miles is the most unpopular 5-0 coach in the history of college football.
And - according to the Big 10 Network - Ricky Stanzi is the first QB to beat Joe Paterno three times.
Quote from: Armchair_QB on October 02, 2010, 11:16:00 PM
Les Miles is the most unpopular 5-0 coach in the history of college football.
And - according to the Big 10 Network - Ricky Stanzi is the first QB to beat Joe Paterno three times.
No homo.
Am I allowed to say that I hate Ron Zook without being compared to BC? Because not going for the tie on 4th and 7 when he lacked his full compliment of timeouts was, how you say, really fucking stupid.
Quote from: SKO on October 03, 2010, 05:20:27 PM
Am I allowed to say that I hate Ron Zook without being compared to BC? Because not going for the tie on 4th and 7 when he lacked his full compliment of timeouts was, how you say, really fucking stupid.
I was at the game shouting "What are you doing?" when that happened. A guy behind me goes, "You gotta trust the defense."
I retorted, "Have you been watching the same game?"
Silence....
PS - It doesn't help when the refs give every call to Ohio State too. Especially the non-face mask call during the final OSU scoring drive.
Quote from: SKO on October 03, 2010, 05:20:27 PM
Am I allowed to say that I hate Ron Zook without being compared to BC? Because not going for the tie on 4th and 7 when he lacked his full compliment of timeouts was, how you say, really fucking stupid.
He said in the post-game that he would've gone for it if the ball were at the 1 or 2... I'm sorry, but if you would've gone for it from the 2 then you should go for it from the 7.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 03, 2010, 06:41:47 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 03, 2010, 05:20:27 PM
Am I allowed to say that I hate Ron Zook without being compared to BC? Because not going for the tie on 4th and 7 when he lacked his full compliment of timeouts was, how you say, really fucking stupid.
I was at the game shouting "What are you doing?" when that happened. A guy behind me goes, "You gotta trust the defense."
I retorted, "Have you been watching the same game?"
Silence....
PS - It doesn't help when the refs give every call to Ohio State too. Especially the non-face mask call during the final OSU scoring drive.
Trust the defense? But they didn't even have a full compliment of time outs! It's college! There's no two minute warning! Even if they had stopped them three straight plays they could have run the clock down to practically nothing before kicking it back. It was an awful call. And yeah, the refs hurt big time, especially the phantom face mask, but that's just the breaks when you play the Ohio States and Michigans of the world. The Big Ten has to protect the brand. Ohio State's potential title game bid stands to make the conference a lot of money.
Quote from: SKO on October 03, 2010, 05:20:27 PM
Am I allowed to say that I hate Ron Zook without being compared to BC? Because not going for the tie on 4th and 7 when he lacked his full compliment of timeouts was, how you say, really fucking stupid.
Not going for it is what I come to expect from the idiocy that is Ron Zook.
Purdue is the only team on the field that deserves to win tonight. What a poor effort.
DPD. That game had been scaring me all week. Fitz keeps saying they need to clean up the sloppiness, but they haven't. They've been lucky enough to get away with it the last couple weeks but it caught up to em in this game. Great game for Purdue. Congrats Pex.
Uh, nothing about this?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/sports/ncaafootball/10east.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/sports/ncaafootball/10east.html)
Drunk posting live from a strip club....gotta be a first.
Go Illini!
Quote from: Night Man on October 09, 2010, 10:05:42 PM
DPD. That game had been scaring me all week. Fitz keeps saying they need to clean up the sloppiness, but they haven't. They've been lucky enough to get away with it the last couple weeks but it caught up to em in this game. Great game for Purdue. Congrats Pex.
I was there for the first three quarters and saw nothing resembling football being played by anyone on either team. Northwestern and Purdue are awful, awful. The folks at the game were among the nicest I've ever sat with at a sporting event. Third downs are really big there. People yelled louder for those than they did the Northwestern touchdowns. "Purdue has third down and seven to go at its own 35!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RTc32qBpAk) LOUD NOISES!
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 10, 2010, 09:45:12 AM
Quote from: Night Man on October 09, 2010, 10:05:42 PM
DPD. That game had been scaring me all week. Fitz keeps saying they need to clean up the sloppiness, but they haven't. They've been lucky enough to get away with it the last couple weeks but it caught up to em in this game. Great game for Purdue. Congrats Pex.
I was there for the first three quarters and saw nothing resembling football being played by anyone on either team. Northwestern and Purdue are awful, awful. The folks at the game were among the nicest I've ever sat with at a sporting event. Third downs are really big there. People yelled louder for those than they did the Northwestern touchdowns. "Purdue has third down and seven to go at its own 35!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RTc32qBpAk) LOUD NOISES!
Between watching this game in person and the Bears game on teevee, you may want to scrub your eyeballs with some steel wool.
Quote from: PANK! on October 11, 2010, 08:56:26 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 10, 2010, 09:45:12 AM
Quote from: Night Man on October 09, 2010, 10:05:42 PM
DPD. That game had been scaring me all week. Fitz keeps saying they need to clean up the sloppiness, but they haven't. They've been lucky enough to get away with it the last couple weeks but it caught up to em in this game. Great game for Purdue. Congrats Pex.
I was there for the first three quarters and saw nothing resembling football being played by anyone on either team. Northwestern and Purdue are awful, awful. The folks at the game were among the nicest I've ever sat with at a sporting event. Third downs are really big there. People yelled louder for those than they did the Northwestern touchdowns. "Purdue has third down and seven to go at its own 35!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RTc32qBpAk) LOUD NOISES!
Between watching this game in person and the Bears game on teevee, you may want to scrub your eyeballs with some steel wool.
What? That there was Bear Football, brah. A sight for sore eyes.
So, I guess nobody watched LSU/Florida? You missed some GO GATA:
(http://www.mocksession.com/30fps//ITSAMAGICDRESS.gif)
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 11, 2010, 10:51:08 AM
So, I guess nobody watched LSU/Florida? You missed some GO GATA:
(http://www.mocksession.com/30fps//ITSAMAGICDRESS.gif)
We saw Les Miles try to kill the LSU fans with his decision making. It was a joy to behold him pull another game from his rectum because they can't fire him whilst he's undefeated even though you guys so badly want him to die.
I'll say this though: the man has massive testes.
Quote from: Slaky on October 11, 2010, 10:56:39 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 11, 2010, 10:51:08 AM
So, I guess nobody watched LSU/Florida? You missed some GO GATA:
(http://www.mocksession.com/30fps//ITSAMAGICDRESS.gif)
We saw Les Miles try to kill the LSU fans with his decision making. It was a joy to behold him pull another game from his rectum because they can't fire him whilst he's undefeated even though you guys so badly want him to die.
I'll say this though: the man has massive testes.
Lesticles. Calling a fake field goal on 4th down with the game on the line? Awesome. And scary. He said in the postgame interviews that he saw an opportunity to get a TD with that play.
Quote from: Slaky on October 11, 2010, 10:56:39 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 11, 2010, 10:51:08 AM
So, I guess nobody watched LSU/Florida? You missed some GO GATA:
(http://www.mocksession.com/30fps//ITSAMAGICDRESS.gif)
We saw Les Miles try to kill the LSU fans with his decision making. It was a joy to behold him pull another game from his rectum because they can't fire him whilst he's undefeated even though you guys so badly want him to die.
I'll say this though: the man has massive testes brain damage.
Quote from: Slaky on October 11, 2010, 10:56:39 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 11, 2010, 10:51:08 AM
So, I guess nobody watched LSU/Florida? You missed some GO GATA:
(http://www.mocksession.com/30fps//ITSAMAGICDRESS.gif)
We saw Les Miles try to kill the LSU fans with his decision making. It was a joy to behold him pull another game from his rectum because they can't fire him whilst he's undefeated even though you guys so badly want him to die.
I'll say this though: the man has massive testes.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2193/1690943289_b8299fcf22.jpg?v=0)
X-ray of Les Miles' head.
Spencer Hall of Every Day Should be Saturday did an excellent article a couple weeks ago when he went down to Baton Rouge for the LSU-WV game and compared Les Miles to Colonel Kurtz. That's about where he is right now. They say his methods are unsound...but I see no method.
Quote from: SKO on October 11, 2010, 07:59:01 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 11, 2010, 10:56:39 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 11, 2010, 10:51:08 AM
So, I guess nobody watched LSU/Florida? You missed some GO GATA:
(http://www.mocksession.com/30fps//ITSAMAGICDRESS.gif)
We saw Les Miles try to kill the LSU fans with his decision making. It was a joy to behold him pull another game from his rectum because they can't fire him whilst he's undefeated even though you guys so badly want him to die.
I'll say this though: the man has massive testes.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2193/1690943289_b8299fcf22.jpg?v=0)
X-ray of Les Miles' head.
Spencer Hall of Every Day Should be Saturday did an excellent article a couple weeks ago when he went down to Baton Rouge for the LSU-WV game and compared Les Miles to Colonel Kurtz. That's about where he is right now. They say his methods are unsound...but I see no method.
I know it's far from perfect but I love that fucking movie.
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 11, 2010, 09:29:52 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 11, 2010, 07:59:01 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 11, 2010, 10:56:39 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 11, 2010, 10:51:08 AM
So, I guess nobody watched LSU/Florida? You missed some GO GATA:
(http://www.mocksession.com/30fps//ITSAMAGICDRESS.gif)
We saw Les Miles try to kill the LSU fans with his decision making. It was a joy to behold him pull another game from his rectum because they can't fire him whilst he's undefeated even though you guys so badly want him to die.
I'll say this though: the man has massive testes.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2193/1690943289_b8299fcf22.jpg?v=0)
X-ray of Les Miles' head.
Spencer Hall of Every Day Should be Saturday did an excellent article a couple weeks ago when he went down to Baton Rouge for the LSU-WV game and compared Les Miles to Colonel Kurtz. That's about where he is right now. They say his methods are unsound...but I see no method.
I know it's far from perfect but I love that fucking movie.
You say that like there's some group of people out there who hate it. Those people would be gay.
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed fake breasts!!!!!
Even less interesting'd.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
I liked the Terminator glasses.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Why am I not surprised?
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 11:19:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Why am I not surprised?
You said "slice" singular like there was only one fine bit of skirt in that shot. I count at least seven. Homo.
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 11:19:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Why am I not surprised?
Is it because my reputed homosexuality leaves me with zero interest in pixelated women flapping their arms like retards on a 4-second loop?
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 11:34:06 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 11:19:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Why am I not surprised?
Is it because my reputed homosexuality leaves me with zero interest in pixelated women flapping their arms like retards on a 4-second loop?
Precisely.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Ivy6 and I endorse this post.
Quote from: Eli on October 12, 2010, 12:24:54 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Ivy6 and I endorse this post.
I KNEW you were the same person!
Quote from: Eli on October 12, 2010, 12:24:54 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Ivy6 and I endorse this post.
Endorsed over here because if you're on the internet and you're not looking at porn there's something wrong with you.
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:27:05 PM
Endorsed over here because if you're on the internet and you're not looking at porn there's something wrong with you.
What if you're at work and would like to maintain a steady income to keep your family fed?
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:27:05 PM
Endorsed over here because if you're on the internet and you're not looking at porn there's something wrong with you.
What if you're at work and would like to maintain a steady income to keep your family fed?
iPhone
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 12, 2010, 12:32:57 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:27:05 PM
Endorsed over here because if you're on the internet and you're not looking at porn there's something wrong with you.
What if you're at work and would like to maintain a steady income to keep your family fed?
iPhone
Boom.
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:38:45 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 12, 2010, 12:32:57 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:27:05 PM
Endorsed over here because if you're on the internet and you're not looking at porn there's something wrong with you.
What if you're at work and would like to maintain a steady income to keep your family fed?
iPhone
Boom.
THI
Quote from: Bort on October 12, 2010, 02:34:19 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:38:45 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 12, 2010, 12:32:57 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:27:05 PM
Endorsed over here because if you're on the internet and you're not looking at porn there's something wrong with you.
What if you're at work and would like to maintain a steady income to keep your family fed?
iPhone
Boom.
THI
THA
Quote from: Yeti on October 12, 2010, 02:35:44 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 12, 2010, 02:34:19 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:38:45 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 12, 2010, 12:32:57 PM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 12:31:38 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 12, 2010, 12:27:05 PM
Endorsed over here because if you're on the internet and you're not looking at porn there's something wrong with you.
What if you're at work and would like to maintain a steady income to keep your family fed?
iPhone
Boom.
THI
THA
DUH
Quote from: PenPho on October 12, 2010, 12:26:04 PM
Quote from: Eli on October 12, 2010, 12:24:54 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 12, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 12, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
What's gay is none of you fagatrons saying poo about that fine slice of go gata ass in the gif. Fucking faggots.
OMG... 74 choppily-animated frames of pixelated and posterized fully-clothed breasts!!!!!
Ivy6 and I endorse this post.
I KNEW you were the same person!
First I was like "HE DOESN'T SPEAK FOR ME" but then I was all "he's right and I really do endorse that."
Tangent: A friend of mine raised a really interesting point. Can anyone justify the existence of a marching band? I know there are a handful of schools that honestly care about theirs but honestly, most people at a game don't give a shit about the marching band. They come on the field at halftime all trained and dressed with their expensive, giant instruments and no one is paying attention. People are taking a piss or getting food. The only people that care are their parents. Some of these people even get scholarships. They take up a couple hundred prime seats at a college stadium that could be milked for revenue. Instead, the college is not only giving them free seats - they're clothing them in capes, giving them huge instruments and in some cases even paying for their college education. Hell, they even spend money to fly all these clowns with their capes and big ass hats and massive cargo to away games and bowl games.
Why? Does anyone care?
Are marching bands an unbelievable source of revenue that I'm just not aware of?
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 02:40:37 PM
Tangent: A friend of mine raised a really interesting point. Can anyone justify the existence of a marching band? I know there are a handful of schools that honestly care about theirs but honestly, most people at a game don't give a shit about the marching band. They come on the field at halftime all trained and dressed with their expensive, giant instruments and no one is paying attention. People are taking a piss or getting food. The only people that care are their parents. Some of these people even get scholarships. They take up a couple hundred prime seats at a college stadium that could be milked for revenue. Instead, the college is not only giving them free seats - they're clothing them in capes, giving them huge instruments and in some cases even paying for their college education. Hell, they even spend money to fly all these clowns with their capes and big ass hats and massive cargo to away games and bowl games.
Why? Does anyone care?
Are marching bands an unbelievable source of revenue that I'm just not aware of?
Black people really love marching bands. The cool kinds. The ones they make movies about. Remember that one with Nick Cannon? Nick Cannon is hilarious. He's the host of America's Got Talent now. I'm guessing that a really cool marching band would do pretty well on that show. I'm not sure it would win, but it would definitely get a few rounds in.
Hope this helps!
Quote from: JD on October 16, 2010, 02:47:29 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 02:40:37 PM
Tangent: A friend of mine raised a really interesting point. Can anyone justify the existence of a marching band? I know there are a handful of schools that honestly care about theirs but honestly, most people at a game don't give a shit about the marching band. They come on the field at halftime all trained and dressed with their expensive, giant instruments and no one is paying attention. People are taking a piss or getting food. The only people that care are their parents. Some of these people even get scholarships. They take up a couple hundred prime seats at a college stadium that could be milked for revenue. Instead, the college is not only giving them free seats - they're clothing them in capes, giving them huge instruments and in some cases even paying for their college education. Hell, they even spend money to fly all these clowns with their capes and big ass hats and massive cargo to away games and bowl games.
Why? Does anyone care?
Are marching bands an unbelievable source of revenue that I'm just not aware of?
Black people really love marching bands. The cool kinds. The ones they make movies about. Remember that one with Nick Cannon? Nick Cannon is hilarious. He's the host of America's Got Talent now. I'm guessing that a really cool marching band would do pretty well on that show. I'm not sure it would win, but it would definitely get a few rounds in.
Hope this helps!
Some people really love marching bands; not me.
I once made the mistake of sitting down with a college friend who told me he wanted me to watch a "really awesome" video. Ghey porn? No. Worse. It was a marching band competition.
As I trembled and beads of sweat ran down my brow, he held me close to his bare, hairy chest and I realized, "I fucking hate marching bands".
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 05:03:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Agreed one-hundred percent.
Indiana and Minnesota at home seem winnable. As does Purdue.
Northwestern and Fresno will be fun games too.
I like marching bands when they're not marching. The music's fine.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 16, 2010, 05:11:12 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 05:03:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Agreed one-hundred percent.
Indiana and Minnesota at home seem winnable. As does Purdue.
Northwestern and Fresno will be fun games too.
Yeah, I have fun watching crappy teams, too.
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 02:40:37 PM
Tangent: A friend of mine raised a really interesting point. Can anyone justify the existence of a marching band? I know there are a handful of schools that honestly care about theirs but honestly, most people at a game don't give a shit about the marching band. They come on the field at halftime all trained and dressed with their expensive, giant instruments and no one is paying attention. People are taking a piss or getting food. The only people that care are their parents. Some of these people even get scholarships. They take up a couple hundred prime seats at a college stadium that could be milked for revenue. Instead, the college is not only giving them free seats - they're clothing them in capes, giving them huge instruments and in some cases even paying for their college education. Hell, they even spend money to fly all these clowns with their capes and big ass hats and massive cargo to away games and bowl games.
Why? Does anyone care?
Are marching bands an unbelievable source of revenue that I'm just not aware of?
My mom loves marching bands. She always complains that they never show the band on TV during halftime anymore. I don't ever remember them showing the band during halftime, so she must be complaining about something that hasn't been done in thirty years.
As pointless as the halftimes show is, I really like hearing the band play during the game. I dig the atmosphere. Hell I can't imagine watching a USC or Michigan game without hearing the band, and I hate their damn songs.
And sousaphones are pretty cool.
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 05:03:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Doesn't that help Zook keep his jorb? Is that what Illini fans want?
Quote from: Shooter on October 17, 2010, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 05:03:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Doesn't that help Zook keep his jorb? Is that what Illini fans want?
Sure, why not.
Quote from: Slaky on October 17, 2010, 02:51:52 PM
Quote from: Shooter on October 17, 2010, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 05:03:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Doesn't that help Zook keep his jorb? Is that what Illini fans want?
Sure, why not.
It's not like he's doing any of the coaching this season anyway. If he can continue to be the fine recruiter that he is with none of the actual coaching responsibilities going forward, I can live with that.
A bowl game would be nice too.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 17, 2010, 09:25:37 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 17, 2010, 02:51:52 PM
Quote from: Shooter on October 17, 2010, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 05:03:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Doesn't that help Zook keep his jorb? Is that what Illini fans want?
Sure, why not.
It's not like he's doing any of the coaching this season anyway. If he can continue to be the fine recruiter that he is with none of the actual coaching responsibilities going forward, I can live with that.
A bowl game would be nice too.
I just want to see him crap his pants and run off the field. That's all I want out of this season.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 17, 2010, 09:25:37 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 17, 2010, 02:51:52 PM
Quote from: Shooter on October 17, 2010, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 16, 2010, 05:03:54 PM
Quote from: R-V on October 16, 2010, 05:02:35 PM
Dammit, I was just starting to get a Nathan Steelhouse chubby and he had to go and throw 3 picks. I still like this Illinois team.
The key is for Zook to make sure they don't get too down about this loss. A win would have been great but they made MSU earn it and they need to make sure that they don't lose sight of the next two very winnable home games. Win those and you're one win shy of a bowl. That's really all I'm asking for this year.
Doesn't that help Zook keep his jorb? Is that what Illini fans want?
Sure, why not.
It's not like he's doing any of the coaching this season anyway. If he can continue to be the fine recruiter that he is with none of the actual coaching responsibilities going forward, I can live with that.
A bowl game would be nice too.
Illinois Football: Tempered Expectations (When We Have Any) Since 1935.
32-10 against McNeese. Yes...that McNeese that you've never heard of. FIYER GARRY KROWTUN
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 18, 2010, 08:36:10 AM
32-10 against McNeese. Yes...that McNeese that you've never heard of. FIYER GARRY KROWTUN
Oh shit. Is it 2000 again? Where the fuck did I put my Jim Miller jersey? TRADE CADE!
I wasn't 4 miles from my house yesterday but I felt like I was in East Lansing. Funny to see a team win by eight after getting their first lead with literally two minutes left in the game. I'll confess that Northwestern's better than I thought. Good on 'em.
So what happened in Iowa City? Was the epic failure of burning a timeout instead of spiking the ball on Ferentz or that Ricky dude? Nice clock management, Jim.
/Big 10 talk
Quote from: PANK! on October 24, 2010, 07:58:38 AM
I wasn't 4 miles from my house yesterday but I felt like I was in East Lansing. Funny to see a team win by eight after getting their first lead with literally two minutes left in the game. I'll confess that Northwestern's better than I thought. Good on 'em.
So what happened in Iowa City? Was the epic failure of burning a timeout instead of spiking the ball on Ferentz or that Ricky dude? Nice clock management, Jim.
/Big 10 talk
They're two plays away from being undefeated, if they'd executed. I love Fitz but man, discipline and playcalling have been embarrassing the last two games.
Quote from: Night Man on October 24, 2010, 03:17:40 PM
Quote from: PANK! on October 24, 2010, 07:58:38 AM
I wasn't 4 miles from my house yesterday but I felt like I was in East Lansing. Funny to see a team win by eight after getting their first lead with literally two minutes left in the game. I'll confess that Northwestern's better than I thought. Good on 'em.
So what happened in Iowa City? Was the epic failure of burning a timeout instead of spiking the ball on Ferentz or that Ricky dude? Nice clock management, Jim.
/Big 10 talk
They're two plays away from being undefeated, if they'd executed. I love Fitz but man, discipline and playcalling have been embarrassing the last two games.
Wasn't that Wanny's mantra?
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
...like the quiz shows?
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:03:48 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
I'd be fine with that. Oregon needs to lose like the limey fucks that they are. Also, so does Missouri and Michigan State.
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 08:18:30 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:03:48 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
I'd be fine with that. Oregon needs to lose like the limey fucks that they are. Also, so does Missouri and Michigan State.
Oregon seems more legit than Boise State to me. I don't know why, I just have a FEELING.
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:20:50 AM
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 08:18:30 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:03:48 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
I'd be fine with that. Oregon needs to lose like the limey fucks that they are. Also, so does Missouri and Michigan State.
Oregon seems more legit than Boise State to me. I don't know why, I just have a FEELING.
Probably because they play D1 schools
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
Actually, it means their schedule is a steaming pile of horseshit.
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 08:18:30 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:03:48 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
I'd be fine with that. Oregon needs to lose like the limey fucks that they are. Also, so does Missouri and Michigan State.
Oregon has British guys on their team?
Based on the season so far I think Auburn-Oregon would be the most entertaining title game. Maybe not the best title game...but the
right title game.
Quote from: R-V on October 25, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 08:18:30 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:03:48 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
I'd be fine with that. Oregon needs to lose like the limey fucks that they are. Also, so does Missouri and Michigan State.
Oregon has British guys on their team?
Based on the season so far I think Auburn-Oregon would be the most entertaining title game. Maybe not the best title game...but the right title game.
Yes, and fuck that game. Until Boise gets it's FAIR SHOT, I won't shut up about them. They're a great team. Let them get play for the title (or, the better idea... Have a playoff, just like every other fucking college sport. [and don't fact check me. I don't care if the NCAA Badminton doesn't do a playoff])
Quote from: R-V on October 25, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 08:18:30 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:03:48 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
I'd be fine with that. Oregon needs to lose like the limey fucks that they are. Also, so does Missouri and Michigan State.
Oregon has British guys on their team?
Based on the season so far I think Auburn-Oregon would be the most entertaining title game. Maybe not the best title game...but the right title game.
RV IS RIGHT. Oh god, all that spread option glory. It would be murderific.
Illinois is two wins away from bowl eligibility. Yay.
Representatives from the Texas Bowl were at the homecoming game against Indiana, evidently.
With a somewhat soft schedule to finish up, I could see the Fighting Illini completing the season with 7 wins.
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 09:08:04 AM
Quote from: R-V on October 25, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 08:18:30 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 25, 2010, 08:03:48 AM
Quote from: CubFaninHydePark on October 25, 2010, 01:33:17 AM
That Boise St. remains at 3 in the BCS proves that the computers are rigged and the fix is in.
So I guess Auburn beating 3 top 12 teams this season has nothing to do with anything whatsoever? BLEW TURFF!!1a To be honest, I hope to God Auburn stays undeated or Bama wins out and has to play Boise State for the BCS. I want to see blood.
I'd be fine with that. Oregon needs to lose like the limey fucks that they are. Also, so does Missouri and Michigan State.
Oregon has British guys on their team?
Based on the season so far I think Auburn-Oregon would be the most entertaining title game. Maybe not the best title game...but the right title game.
Yes, and fuck that game. Until Boise gets it's FAIR SHOT, I won't shut up about them. They're a great team. Let them get play for the title (or, the better idea... Have a playoff, just like every other fucking college sport. [and don't fact check me. I don't care if the NCAA Badminton doesn't do a playoff])
A play-off for NCAA football title! I can't believe nobody's thought of this before!
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 25, 2010, 09:30:30 AM
Illinois is two wins away from bowl eligibility. Yay.
Representatives from the Texas Bowl were at the homecoming game against Indiana, evidently.
With a somewhat soft schedule to finish up, I could see the Fighting Illini completing the season with 7 wins.
As long as they have the coordinators do the actual coaching and game planning, leaving Zook to recruiting duties only, Illinois could be pretty good.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 25, 2010, 09:30:30 AM
Illinois is two wins away from bowl eligibility. Yay.
Representatives from the Texas Bowl were at the homecoming game against Indiana, evidently.
With a somewhat soft schedule to finish up, I could see the Fighting Illini completing the season with 7 wins.
I was having a hard time with that spread. It was 13 before kickoff and I can't remember Illinois being so highly favored. This game seemed like a game that Illinois typically chokes away. They're having an ok season and then Indiana comes along, a team that everyone knows is perennially awful, and Illinois gets embarrassed.
But this was pretty sweet. They ended up winning by 30 which is more than I expected. Barring injury this is looking like a bowl team. That Illinois-NW game at Wrigley might have serious
implications.
(http://img1.tvloop.com/img/showpics/11/cf/l3589fffd0000_1_12108.jpg)
Quote from: Waco Kid on October 25, 2010, 09:46:50 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 25, 2010, 09:30:30 AM
Illinois is two wins away from bowl eligibility. Yay.
Representatives from the Texas Bowl were at the homecoming game against Indiana, evidently.
With a somewhat soft schedule to finish up, I could see the Fighting Illini completing the season with 7 wins.
As long as they have the coordinators do the actual coaching and game planning, leaving Zook to recruiting duties only, Illinois could be pretty good.
Indeed. I want that great feeling like after the Ohio State win. You remember that, right? Where Zook was hugging Juice and all was great. Zook was telling him, "See, I told you we could do this." Shit, I got goosebumps.
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 10:12:29 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on October 25, 2010, 09:46:50 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 25, 2010, 09:30:30 AM
Illinois is two wins away from bowl eligibility. Yay.
Representatives from the Texas Bowl were at the homecoming game against Indiana, evidently.
With a somewhat soft schedule to finish up, I could see the Fighting Illini completing the season with 7 wins.
As long as they have the coordinators do the actual coaching and game planning, leaving Zook to recruiting duties only, Illinois could be pretty good.
Indeed. I want that great feeling like after the Ohio State win. You remember that, right? Where Zook was hugging Juice and all was great. Zook was telling him, "See, I told you we could do this." Shit, I got goosebumps.
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
THI. And not merely because the Boilers lost their top running back to a torn ACL in Spring Practice this year.
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:49:04 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
THI. And not merely because the Boilers lost their top running back to a torn ACL in Spring Practice this year.
Well that would have changed everything about the Big Ten's 7th worst defense and absolute worst offense.
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 11:02:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:49:04 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
THI. And not merely because the Boilers lost their top running back to a torn ACL in Spring Practice this year.
Well that would have changed everything about the Big Ten's 7th worst defense and absolute worst offense.
I'm not saying it would, just that not all of their players... fuck it.
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 11:15:37 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 11:02:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:49:04 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
THI. And not merely because the Boilers lost their top running back to a torn ACL in Spring Practice this year.
Well that would have changed everything about the Big Ten's 7th worst defense and absolute worst offense.
I'm not saying it would, just that not all of their players... fuck it.
Yeah, fuck it. Let's go bowlin', Dude.
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 26, 2010, 07:48:02 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 11:15:37 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 11:02:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:49:04 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
THI. And not merely because the Boilers lost their top running back to a torn ACL in Spring Practice this year.
Well that would have changed everything about the Big Ten's 7th worst defense and absolute worst offense.
I'm not saying it would, just that not all of their players... fuck it.
Yeah, fuck it. Let's go bowlin', Dude.
Alamo Bowlin? Wins over Illinois, Michigan and Indiana would put us there. What are the odds of that happening? Take the amount of ass BC will graze between now and New Year's Day, divide it by three.
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 26, 2010, 08:17:29 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 26, 2010, 07:48:02 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 11:15:37 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 11:02:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:49:04 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
THI. And not merely because the Boilers lost their top running back to a torn ACL in Spring Practice this year.
Well that would have changed everything about the Big Ten's 7th worst defense and absolute worst offense.
I'm not saying it would, just that not all of their players... fuck it.
Yeah, fuck it. Let's go bowlin', Dude.
Alamo Bowlin? Wins over Illinois, Michigan and Indiana would put us there. What are the odds of that happening? Take the amount of ass BC will graze between now and New Year's Day, divide it by three.
But zero divided by three is still zero.
Oh.
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 26, 2010, 08:17:29 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on October 26, 2010, 07:48:02 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 11:15:37 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 11:02:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:49:04 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 25, 2010, 08:10:21 PM
Quote from: BC on October 25, 2010, 08:05:43 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
I'll say this for Purdue's football team...
At least their players had the dignity to wait until the season started to have hope-draining, out-for-the-season injuries.
...
...
Too soon?
It's not so much that it's too soon, just that it would be so much better if you didn't say things ever.
THI. And not merely because the Boilers lost their top running back to a torn ACL in Spring Practice this year.
Well that would have changed everything about the Big Ten's 7th worst defense and absolute worst offense.
I'm not saying it would, just that not all of their players... fuck it.
Yeah, fuck it. Let's go bowlin', Dude.
Alamo Bowlin? Wins over Illinois, Michigan and Indiana would put us there. What are the odds of that happening? Take the amount of ass BC will graze between now and New Year's Day, divide it by three.
Purdue's not beating Illinois
(this season, i.e. in their upcoming game; I have to be specific or TEC will jump on my ass).
TWEET THAT.
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
Quote from: Tonker on October 26, 2010, 08:52:13 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 26, 2010, 08:17:29 AM
Alamo Bowlin? Wins over Illinois, Michigan and Indiana would put us there. What are the odds of that happening? Take the amount of ass BC will graze between now and New Year's Day, divide it by three.
But zero divided by three is still zero.
Oh.
Look at you and your fancy math.
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:02:20 AM
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
I can't read that at work, but Reilly and Boise... I really hate myself.
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:02:20 AM
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
Rick Reilly is the RV of metaphors.
QuoteIt's a three-card Monty game and all they get is two cards.
From my understanding of how Three-Card Monty works, it wouldn't be any more fair even if they got all three cards.
GET NOISY IN BOISE!
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:20:15 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:02:20 AM
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
Rick Reilly is the RV of metaphors.
QuoteIt's a three-card Monty game and all they get is two cards.
From my understanding of how Three-Card Monty works, it wouldn't be any more fair even if they got all three cards.
GET NOISY IN BOISE!
This was by far my favorite line:
QuoteAnd the Broncos probably won't even if the Tigers and Ducks don't win out. Yes, we're talking about Auburn. The team that has 13 fewer wins over the past five seasons than Boise State.
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:25:40 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:20:15 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:02:20 AM
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
Rick Reilly is the RV of metaphors.
QuoteIt's a three-card Monty game and all they get is two cards.
From my understanding of how Three-Card Monty works, it wouldn't be any more fair even if they got all three cards.
GET NOISY IN BOISE!
This was by far my favorite line:
QuoteAnd the Broncos probably won't even if the Tigers and Ducks don't win out. Yes, we're talking about Auburn. The team that has 13 fewer wins over the past five seasons than Boise State.
The whole even?
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:02:20 AM
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
I don't think Boise State would win the national title against Oregon, Auburn, Alabama, or someone in that upper echelon (anyone from the Big 12? Yes.) That isn't the point. Then again, they did beat Oregon last year, and that was a 10 win team in a pretty deep Pac 10. I don't think they'd do it again last year, but Reilly has a point in that there's absolutely nothing Boise State could do to get into that game.
They beat every team that they supposedly "have to beat" to prove themselves. They've tried desperately to schedule SEC opponents and others who refuse to play them, because they don't want to hurt their own league's status as the preeminent conference in football. I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it. When they've made it to the BCS, they've won. When they've scheduled ranked BCS opponents during the season, they've won. Last year they made it to the BCS and the BCS matched them up against TCU solely for the chance to discredit whichever one of them won the game. I truly don't think Boise State is a national championship team, but I don't see how you can stand there and say that it's okay that they'll never, ever get the chance to put that to test, since the system has stacked the deck to ensure it won't happen.
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:02:20 AM
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
I don't think Boise State would win the national title against Oregon, Auburn, Alabama, or someone in that upper echelon (anyone from the Big 12? Yes.) That isn't the point. Then again, they did beat Oregon last year, and that was a 10 win team in a pretty deep Pac 10. I don't think they'd do it again last year, but Reilly has a point in that there's absolutely nothing Boise State could do to get into that game.
They beat every team that they supposedly "have to beat" to prove themselves. They've tried desperately to schedule SEC opponents and others who refuse to play them, because they don't want to hurt their own league's status as the preeminent conference in football. I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it. When they've made it to the BCS, they've won. When they've scheduled ranked BCS opponents during the season, they've won. Last year they made it to the BCS and the BCS matched them up against TCU solely for the chance to discredit whichever one of them won the game. I truly don't think Boise State is a national championship team, but I don't see how you can stand there and say that it's okay that they'll never, ever get the chance to put that to test, since the system has stacked the deck to ensure it won't happen.
It's okay by me. Stop demanding a million dollars for someone to play you.
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:31:07 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:02:20 AM
This makes my position on hating Boise State so much easier.
If you like Boise, you're Rick Reilly.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=5725597
I don't think Boise State would win the national title against Oregon, Auburn, Alabama, or someone in that upper echelon (anyone from the Big 12? Yes.) That isn't the point. Then again, they did beat Oregon last year, and that was a 10 win team in a pretty deep Pac 10. I don't think they'd do it again last year, but Reilly has a point in that there's absolutely nothing Boise State could do to get into that game.
They beat every team that they supposedly "have to beat" to prove themselves. They've tried desperately to schedule SEC opponents and others who refuse to play them, because they don't want to hurt their own league's status as the preeminent conference in football. I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it. When they've made it to the BCS, they've won. When they've scheduled ranked BCS opponents during the season, they've won. Last year they made it to the BCS and the BCS matched them up against TCU solely for the chance to discredit whichever one of them won the game. I truly don't think Boise State is a national championship team, but I don't see how you can stand there and say that it's okay that they'll never, ever get the chance to put that to test, since the system has stacked the deck to ensure it won't happen.
It's okay by me. Stop demanding a million dollars for someone to play you.
I think a better example of all of this would actually be the 2008 Utah team. They beat Michigan (albeit in a losing year, yes), an 11 win TCU team, a 9 win Oregon State team, a 10 win BYU team, and then handed Alabama a 31-17 beatdown in the Sugar Bowl, one of 3 losses that Alabama's had in 3 years, and yet they had no chance whatsoever at being awarded the national title. None. If Utah can do something like that to 'Bama, I don't see how we can really rule out the possibility that a team like Boise might actually be capable of beating one of these major conference teams in the title game. Especially because you know Auburn or Oregon will probably fuck up and lose one upset to a team they shouldn't and then some team that we all know isn't really that good like Oklahoma or Ohio State will sneak back in and then lose by 17 points while Boise State beats the ACC champion by 30 in an Orange Bowl that doesn't mean shit.
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
How could a playoff not make money? I just don't see how they couldn't have a playoff and then have all the side bowls that teams like Illinois will play in. They would have exactly the same significance as they currently do. And then the non-championship playoff games will be the non-title bowl games. I really don't see what the hold up is. Actually, I do see the hold up: The NCAA has no INCENTIVE to change. People like me bitch and moan and bitch and moan about the lack of a playoff but we still watch the shit out of the sport and we engage in conversation about the sport. Fuck.
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Quote from: Yeti on October 26, 2010, 09:37:15 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
How could a playoff not make money? I just don't see how they couldn't have a playoff and then have all the side bowls that teams like Illinois will play in. They would have exactly the same significance as they currently do. And then the non-championship playoff games will be the non-title bowl games. I really don't see what the hold up is. Actually, I do see the hold up: The NCAA has no INCENTIVE to change. People like me bitch and moan and bitch and moan about the lack of a playoff but we still watch the shit out of the sport and we engage in conversation about the sport. Fuck.
All those games would undermine the TRUE reason the NCAA football exists - to educate these student atheletes and prepare them for life in the real world.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
They're too busy recovering from the devastating Jimmy John's defeat.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
I don't think Boise sucks by any means. I think they'd fare well in any conference. Would they run the table? Maybe. We'll never know. But until they play credible teams in conference I don't give a shit what they do.
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:55:20 AM
I don't think Boise sucks by any means. I think they'd fare well in any conference. Would they run the table? Maybe. We'll never know. But until they play credible teams in conference I don't give a shit what they do.
Why don't you just cut your god damn hair and go get some new slacks at JC Penny's, because you're just part of the machine, pal. You used to be cool, man.
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 26, 2010, 09:55:20 AM
I don't think Boise sucks by any means. I think they'd fare well in any conference. Would they run the table? Maybe. We'll never know. But until they play credible teams in conference I don't give a shit what they do.
Why don't you just cut your god damn hair and go get some new slacks at JC Penny's, because you're just part of the machine, pal. You used to be cool, man.
One of us. One of us.
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I pick my battles. Never on principle, but always on whether or not I can win.
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
I just don't get the logic. Animals themselves eat other animals. Why is it immoral for humans to do the same?
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 08:15:10 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
I just don't get the logic. Animals themselves eat other animals. Why is it immoral for humans to do the same?
Because they're all liberal elitist pussies above the rest of the barbaric humans that feed on other animals.
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
This. My wife gets sick if she eats chicken, beef, pork, or lamb. And she's a bleeding heart about animals. But she's not deranged enough to go full vetard.
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 08:20:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 08:15:10 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
I just don't get the logic. Animals themselves eat other animals. Why is it immoral for humans to do the same?
Because they're all liberal elitist pussies above the rest of the barbaric humans that feed on other animals.
Until you develop a healthy, hetero love of bacon, sit in the back of the carnivore bus.
Quote from: Fork on October 27, 2010, 08:51:44 AM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 08:20:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 08:15:10 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
I just don't get the logic. Animals themselves eat other animals. Why is it immoral for humans to do the same?
Because they're all liberal elitist pussies above the rest of the barbaric humans that feed on other animals.
Until you develop a healthy, hetero love of bacon, sit in the back of the carnivore bus.
I'm coming around.
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
This. My wife gets sick if she eats chicken, beef, pork, or lamb. And she's a bleeding heart about animals. But she's not deranged enough to go full vetard.
Most of the vegetarians I know did it for diet reasons or because meat makes them sick. I know one Jewish kid who is vegan because he thinks it's just easier to keep kosher that way. I tried telling him nothing's ever going to purify him or his filthy people of the sin of killing the Son of Man, so he might as well enjoy a bacon cheeseburger, but so far he hasn't listened.
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 09:01:32 AM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
This. My wife gets sick if she eats chicken, beef, pork, or lamb. And she's a bleeding heart about animals. But she's not deranged enough to go full vetard.
Most of the vegetarians I know did it for diet reasons or because meat makes them sick. I know one Jewish kid who is vegan because he thinks it's just easier to keep kosher that way. I tried telling him nothing's ever going to purify him or his filthy people of the sin of killing the Son of Man, so he might as well enjoy a bacon cheeseburger, but so far he hasn't listened.
The only thing dumber than being a vegan for the sake of the poor, defenseless animals (who will fucking kill you if given the chance) is being a vegan because some fake asshole in the sky deems it to be the only way to salvation.
People are the worst.
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 09:38:52 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 09:01:32 AM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
This. My wife gets sick if she eats chicken, beef, pork, or lamb. And she's a bleeding heart about animals. But she's not deranged enough to go full vetard.
Most of the vegetarians I know did it for diet reasons or because meat makes them sick. I know one Jewish kid who is vegan because he thinks it's just easier to keep kosher that way. I tried telling him nothing's ever going to purify him or his filthy people of the sin of killing the Son of Man, so he might as well enjoy a bacon cheeseburger, but so far he hasn't listened.
The only thing dumber than being a vegan for the sake of the poor, defenseless animals (who will fucking kill you if given the chance) is being a vegan because some fake asshole in the sky deems it to be the only way to salvation.
People are the worst.
I believe my chosen deity would rather that I pass on eating human beings. Outside of that, I don't think he cares.
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 09:46:15 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 09:38:52 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 09:01:32 AM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
This. My wife gets sick if she eats chicken, beef, pork, or lamb. And she's a bleeding heart about animals. But she's not deranged enough to go full vetard.
Most of the vegetarians I know did it for diet reasons or because meat makes them sick. I know one Jewish kid who is vegan because he thinks it's just easier to keep kosher that way. I tried telling him nothing's ever going to purify him or his filthy people of the sin of killing the Son of Man, so he might as well enjoy a bacon cheeseburger, but so far he hasn't listened.
The only thing dumber than being a vegan for the sake of the poor, defenseless animals (who will fucking kill you if given the chance) is being a vegan because some fake asshole in the sky deems it to be the only way to salvation.
People are the worst.
I believe my chosen deity would rather that I pass on eating human beings. Outside of that, I don't think he cares.
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 09:46:15 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 09:38:52 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 09:01:32 AM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 08:44:36 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: Tonker on October 27, 2010, 01:58:07 AM
Quote from: JD on October 26, 2010, 10:05:18 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 26, 2010, 10:46:08 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:51:43 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:46:35 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:42:41 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 26, 2010, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 26, 2010, 09:27:31 AM
I realize that this will just lead to more bitching and moaning that won't accomplish anything, and there'll never be a playoff until someone figures out a way to ensure that it will raise as much money as the bowl games do, but the point is that the system is fucked and Boise's a great example of it.
When will people learn? CAPITALISM JUST DOESN'T WORK!
Hell, capitalism doesn't really apply to sports anyway. The NFL's revenue sharing and salary caps aren't exactly all invisible-handy.
Monopolies and cartels are a part of capitalism, too. Some might say a big part.
But we're straying from the salient point here, namely: when does the IWW stage their takeover of D-I football?
I punched a kid freshman year who was a Wobblie. The punch had nothing to do with that, and I only found after the fact. But I was proud of it.
SKO: proud future Pinkerton.
I don't even know why the fight started. I was drunk, he threw a punch at my roommate, I answered back. People broke it up, we left, I threw up in the bushes. Later on he was in my speech class and he gave a speech about the IWW and why we should all support their cause. He gave another speech about him and his girlfriend and how inspiring it was that they had both gone vegan together. Honestly, my only regret is not punching him more.
He sounds small and puny. I'm guessing the threat or retaliation was low. Good on ya for being smart about violence.
I'll take my chances against ANY vegan. One punch, they snap.
I can sort understand vegetarians. You don't like meat, it makes you feel like shit, fine. Don't eat it.
But vegans? They're full of shit.
This. My wife gets sick if she eats chicken, beef, pork, or lamb. And she's a bleeding heart about animals. But she's not deranged enough to go full vetard.
Most of the vegetarians I know did it for diet reasons or because meat makes them sick. I know one Jewish kid who is vegan because he thinks it's just easier to keep kosher that way. I tried telling him nothing's ever going to purify him or his filthy people of the sin of killing the Son of Man, so he might as well enjoy a bacon cheeseburger, but so far he hasn't listened.
The only thing dumber than being a vegan for the sake of the poor, defenseless animals (who will fucking kill you if given the chance) is being a vegan because some fake asshole in the sky deems it to be the only way to salvation.
People are the worst.
I believe my chosen deity would rather that I pass on eating human beings. Outside of that, I don't think he cares.
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think that's more or less what I just said. Only that I differ on whether or not the sky creature is imaginary. But thanks for getting that in there.
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Don't you? It'd be pretty silly to not believe in something that clearly exists.
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:00:46 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 09:46:15 AM
I believe my chosen deity would rather that I pass on eating human beings. Outside of that, I don't think he cares.
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think that's more or less what I just said. Only that I differ on whether or not the sky creature is imaginary. But thanks for getting that in there.
And on whether eating man meat is okay.
(No homo.)
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 10:02:25 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Don't you? It'd be pretty silly to not believe in something that clearly exists.
Cannibalism? Racism? Dude, that's not for us. Those decisions are better left to the suits in Washington. We're just here to eat some dude.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on October 27, 2010, 10:05:44 AM
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 10:02:25 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Don't you? It'd be pretty silly to not believe in something that clearly exists.
Cannibalism? Racism? Dude, that's not for us. Those decisions are better left to the suits in Washington. We're just here to eat some dude.
Dee Reynolds: [Examining African American specimen] I don't think I can eat this guy.
Charlie Kelly: I don't think I can, right? Why is that?
Dee Reynolds: I don't know.
Charlie Kelly: It's not because he's black, though, right?
Dee Reynolds: Of course not... I don't think so... No.
Charlie Kelly: It's because he's dead, right?
Dee Reynolds: It's because he's dead, that's why not.
Charlie Kelly: Good, good, good.
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 12:54:12 PM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
Hell, Jr. Huey scoffed at this.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 12:54:12 PM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
I'm attributing this to another Shoutbox meme, one that I *especially* don't want to know about.
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 01:10:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 12:54:12 PM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
I'm attributing this to another Shoutbox meme, one that I *especially* don't want to know about.
I really wish I could scrub that one out of my brain.
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 01:10:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 12:54:12 PM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
I'm attributing this to another Shoutbox meme, one that I *especially* don't want to know about.
Too late (http://www.handjobexchange.com/sbox/dlog.php?highlight=p113212656&date=2010-7-27#p113212656)
Quote from: BortPregant = Anal.
Quote from: HueyI wasn't so lucky, Jon...... I'm too big.
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 01:37:32 PM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 01:10:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 12:54:12 PM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
I'm attributing this to another Shoutbox meme, one that I *especially* don't want to know about.
I really wish I could scrub that one out of my brain.
It's a good thing nobody asked him about the size of his newborn son's dong.
Quote from: Fork on October 27, 2010, 01:54:49 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 01:37:32 PM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 01:10:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 12:54:12 PM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
I'm attributing this to another Shoutbox meme, one that I *especially* don't want to know about.
I really wish I could scrub that one out of my brain.
It's a good thing nobody asked him about the size of his newborn son's dong.
It's more of a dork.
Quote from: Slaky on October 27, 2010, 02:48:05 PM
Quote from: Fork on October 27, 2010, 01:54:49 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 01:37:32 PM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 01:10:57 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 12:54:12 PM
Quote from: Yeti on October 27, 2010, 12:31:55 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:26:56 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 12:23:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on October 27, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
Quote from: SKO on October 27, 2010, 10:17:16 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 10:15:35 AM
Quote from: Eli on October 27, 2010, 10:00:05 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 27, 2010, 09:57:17 AM
I believe in eating whatever you want, regardless of what some imaginary sky creature says to do or not do.
I think Gil just admitted that he believes in cannibalism.
Absolute freedom. Imagine it.
The cannibalism line just barely made the cutting room floor when Lennon was working on Imagine, actually.
That gutless slapdick.
It's true. The original line was "no need for greed or hunger, you could feast on your fellow man..."
Maybe *he* can. I just look at human flesh and I gain 5 pounds.
I have a tendency to gain 5 inches
Huey scoffed at this.
I'm attributing this to another Shoutbox meme, one that I *especially* don't want to know about.
I really wish I could scrub that one out of my brain.
It's a good thing nobody asked him about the size of his newborn son's dong.
It's more of a dork.
His dad's a dork.
Whitlock sez Kelly must go. (http://msn.foxsports.com/collegefootball/story/notre-dame-must-fire-brian-kelly-over-student-death-102910)
Quote from: Slaky on October 29, 2010, 01:14:19 PM
Whitlock sez Kelly must go. (http://msn.foxsports.com/collegefootball/story/notre-dame-must-fire-brian-kelly-over-student-death-102910)
I assume this has made the rounds, or "DRLP" as the kids like to say?
(http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/11/2010/10/340x_gelo5.jpg)
More on the scissor lift thing:
http://deadspin.com/5676666/
Illini looking sharp thus far.
So, if Notre Dame does win today, will they be sacrificing an employee every week to the football gods?
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/colleges/2847612,CST-SPT-nd30.article (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/colleges/2847612,CST-SPT-nd30.article)
Really, Sun-Times?
Wow, Purdue sucks. The only drama left in this one is what BC will bitch about. Oh right - the refs and Zook.
Quote from: Slaky on October 30, 2010, 12:51:42 PM
Wow, Purdue sucks. The only drama left in this one is what BC will bitch about. Oh right - the refs and Zook.
Well, our friend BC was at the game so you'll get some in depth analysis.
Quote from: Yeti on October 30, 2010, 03:14:11 PM
Quote from: Slaky on October 30, 2010, 12:51:42 PM
Wow, Purdue sucks. The only drama left in this one is what BC will bitch about. Oh right - the refs and Zook.
Well, our friend BC was at the game so you'll get some in depth analysis.
He's really taking advantage of not living in Wyoming.
I'm wondering how Yeti knew I was at the game???
Anyway, good game from the Illini. What is this "bowl" thing that people keep talking about?
Illinois is truly doing a great job of ensuring that Zook has little to no involvement in fucking up his great recruits. I'll build mini Paul Petrino and Vic Koening statues in my yard if they manage to get this program to back-to-back bowls for once in my God damn life. I also enjoy how Scheelhaase is progressing. For all of Juice's talent, he never struck me as being half as smart as Scheelhaase. They're certainly capable of winning at least 3 and maybe all 4 of their remaining games. That defense can contain Denard Robinson enough to enable them to make it three straight victories of Michigan. Then hell will open up and swallow us all whole.
Quote from: BC on October 31, 2010, 06:20:25 PM
I'm wondering how Yeti knew I was at the game???
Anyway, good game from the Illini. What is this "bowl" thing that people keep talking about?
The Cubs bullpen catcher can tell you.
Quote from: BC on October 31, 2010, 06:20:25 PM
I'm wondering how Yeti knew I was at the game???
Anyway, good game from the Illini. What is this "bowl" thing that people keep talking about?
Because you told me on the book of faces. Apparently you were high
For Pex:
(http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/475861/Screen_shot_2010-11-01_at_12.59.42_PM.png)
Quote from: SKO on November 01, 2010, 12:56:02 PM
For Pex:
(http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/475861/Screen_shot_2010-11-01_at_12.59.42_PM.png)
That is awesome.
Quote from: SKO on November 01, 2010, 12:56:02 PM
For Pex:
(http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/475861/Screen_shot_2010-11-01_at_12.59.42_PM.png)
ILL...
I don't remember that Yeti, but whatever you say...
Quote from: Gilgamesh on November 01, 2010, 12:59:06 PM
Quote from: SKO on November 01, 2010, 12:56:02 PM
For Pex:
(http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/475861/Screen_shot_2010-11-01_at_12.59.42_PM.png)
ILL...
...NIT
Wait, is this a...? What day is this?
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 01, 2010, 01:25:27 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on November 01, 2010, 12:59:06 PM
Quote from: SKO on November 01, 2010, 12:56:02 PM
For Pex:
(http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/475861/Screen_shot_2010-11-01_at_12.59.42_PM.png)
ILL...
...NIT
Wait, is this a...? What day is this?
Oh look, you're that guy who brings up an unrelated sport when confronted with how shitty your team is. That guy's not a bitch at all.
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 10:12:29 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on October 25, 2010, 09:46:50 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 25, 2010, 09:30:30 AM
Illinois is two wins away from bowl eligibility. Yay.
Representatives from the Texas Bowl were at the homecoming game against Indiana, evidently.
With a somewhat soft schedule to finish up, I could see the Fighting Illini completing the season with 7 wins.
As long as they have the coordinators do the actual coaching and game planning, leaving Zook to recruiting duties only, Illinois could be pretty good.
Indeed. I want that great feeling like after the Ohio State win. You remember that, right? Where Zook was hugging Juice and all was great. Zook was telling him, "See, I told you we could do this." Shit, I got goosebumps.
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
Fail.
Quote from: Gilgamesh on November 01, 2010, 04:57:22 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on October 25, 2010, 10:31:43 AM
Quote from: Yeti on October 25, 2010, 10:12:29 AM
Quote from: Waco Kid on October 25, 2010, 09:46:50 AM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on October 25, 2010, 09:30:30 AM
Illinois is two wins away from bowl eligibility. Yay.
Representatives from the Texas Bowl were at the homecoming game against Indiana, evidently.
With a somewhat soft schedule to finish up, I could see the Fighting Illini completing the season with 7 wins.
As long as they have the coordinators do the actual coaching and game planning, leaving Zook to recruiting duties only, Illinois could be pretty good.
Indeed. I want that great feeling like after the Ohio State win. You remember that, right? Where Zook was hugging Juice and all was great. Zook was telling him, "See, I told you we could do this." Shit, I got goosebumps.
They could lose to Purdue. Probably.
Fail.
Leave me alone.
So I received my tickets to the Wrigley Field NU/Illinois game today. Quick Wrigley question - are the bleachers numbered?
Quote from: Indolent Reader on November 10, 2010, 04:34:36 PM
So I received my tickets to the Wrigley Field NU/Illinois game today. Quick Wrigley question - are the bleachers numbered?
No. Good luck traversing all the TDubbses.
Quote from: Slaky on November 10, 2010, 05:30:39 PM
Quote from: Indolent Reader on November 10, 2010, 04:34:36 PM
So I received my tickets to the Wrigley Field NU/Illinois game today. Quick Wrigley question - are the bleachers numbered?
No. Good luck traversing all the TDubbses.
Hellz nah broseifus. That shit is first cum, first serve. If I see you there, though, let's pound some puss and some brewdogs.
Still not happy with losing to Pex's Boilers, but at least I can take comfort in the annual Ioa upset.
Just wondering if Illinois had any timeouts at the beginning of Minnesota's final drive and, if so, how many?
I'll go do stuff and wait for my answer. Thanks.
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:29:12 PM
Just wondering if Illinois had any timeouts at the beginning of Minnesota's final drive and, if so, how many?
I'll go do stuff and wait for my answer. Thanks.
They were down to their final three.
Quote from: Night Man on November 13, 2010, 02:25:48 PM
Still not happy with losing to Pex's Boilers, but at least I can take comfort in the annual Ioa upset.
I'm curious whether Chuck To Chuck was in attendance for the late-game heroics.
Illinois could very well lose to the Cats in the Ricketts Bowl next week and have their once-presumed Bowl eligibility riding on that trip to Fresno St. That will be no cakewalk, octaroons. I guess people are happy with Zook though still? Even after today's tardfest, he should keep his jorb as the all-world recruiter and let those other dipshits manage the team? Fuck it, it works for me.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:31:10 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:29:12 PM
Just wondering if Illinois had any timeouts at the beginning of Minnesota's final drive and, if so, how many?
I'll go do stuff and wait for my answer. Thanks.
They were down to their final three.
Not that it would have mattered, after those clown shoes were in the midst of blowing a 10 point lead to those goofs from Minnesota, but why wouldn't you at least start burning them after the 45 yard run made it first-and-goal at the 5 with, what, 1:11 to play? At least buy yourself a last chance instead of just standing there like a dope as it alll crumbles around you.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:36:50 PM
Illinois could very well lose to the Cats in the Ricketts Bowl next week and have their once-presumed Bowl eligibility riding on that trip to Fresno St. That will be no cakewalk, octaroons. I guess people are happy with Zook though still? Even after today's tardfest, he should keep his jorb as the all-world recruiter and let those other dipshits manage the team? Fuck it, it works for me.
The Ricketts Bowl doesn't involve Todd and a toilet? Why I never.
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:47:30 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:31:10 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:29:12 PM
Just wondering if Illinois had any timeouts at the beginning of Minnesota's final drive and, if so, how many?
I'll go do stuff and wait for my answer. Thanks.
They were down to their final three.
Not that it would have mattered, after those clown shoes were in the midst of blowing a 10 point lead to those goofs from Minnesota, but why wouldn't you at least start burning them after the 45 yard run made it first-and-goal at the 5 with, what, 1:11 to play? At least buy yourself a last chance instead of just standing there like a dope as it alll crumbles around you.
Coaching isn't really his thing. He's more into the whole recruiting of awesome players aspect. Just look at all the talent on that roster. It didn't fall from a tree. Nosir.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:50:38 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:47:30 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:31:10 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:29:12 PM
Just wondering if Illinois had any timeouts at the beginning of Minnesota's final drive and, if so, how many?
I'll go do stuff and wait for my answer. Thanks.
They were down to their final three.
Not that it would have mattered, after those clown shoes were in the midst of blowing a 10 point lead to those goofs from Minnesota, but why wouldn't you at least start burning them after the 45 yard run made it first-and-goal at the 5 with, what, 1:11 to play? At least buy yourself a last chance instead of just standing there like a dope as it alll crumbles around you.
Coaching isn't really his thing. He's more into the whole recruiting of awesome players aspect. Just look at all the talent on that roster. It didn't fall from a tree. Nosir.
I saw Aureilous (sp.?) Benn make a nice TD catch for some NFL team last week.
Is the announcement of Dan Persa out for the season with an achilles injury a big deal?
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:52:56 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:50:38 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:47:30 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:31:10 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 13, 2010, 02:29:12 PM
Just wondering if Illinois had any timeouts at the beginning of Minnesota's final drive and, if so, how many?
I'll go do stuff and wait for my answer. Thanks.
They were down to their final three.
Not that it would have mattered, after those clown shoes were in the midst of blowing a 10 point lead to those goofs from Minnesota, but why wouldn't you at least start burning them after the 45 yard run made it first-and-goal at the 5 with, what, 1:11 to play? At least buy yourself a last chance instead of just standing there like a dope as it alll crumbles around you.
Coaching isn't really his thing. He's more into the whole recruiting of awesome players aspect. Just look at all the talent on that roster. It didn't fall from a tree. Nosir.
I saw Aureilous (sp.?) Benn make a nice TD catch for some NFL team last week.
I think he actually did fall from a tree. Only him though.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:54:47 PM
Is the announcement of Dan Persa out for the season with an achilles injury a big deal?
Yes. It'll serve as the lipstick for Ron Zook's pig of a bowl team.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:54:47 PM
Is the announcement of Dan Persa out for the season with an achilles injury a big deal?
Well it was a nut punch to an otherwise nice day. At least his last pass was a game winner.
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 03:08:55 PM
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
It puts a lot of pressure on the Wisconsin basketball team.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 03:08:55 PM
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
Indiana's football team lost to Penn State 2-1 today in the Big Ten semis at State College. The Hoosiers do not have any other squad playing anything resembling "football."
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:36:50 PM
Illinois could very well lose to the Cats in the Ricketts Bowl next week and have their once-presumed Bowl eligibility riding on that trip to Fresno St. That will be no cakewalk, octaroons. I guess people are happy with Zook though still? Even after today's tardfest, he should keep his jorb as the all-world recruiter and let those other dipshits manage the team? Fuck it, it works for me.
Classic Zook loss today. At home, on senior day, to a winless team, with a shit ton of missed tackles and penalties to close the deal.
Fuck my goddamn gutless fucking alma mater.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:54:47 PM
Is the announcement of Dan Persa out for the season with an achilles injury a big deal?
For Northwestern, yeah. One could make the argument he's more valuable to Northwestern than anyone else is to his team in the whole conference. Watkins is 6'6 but a redshirt freshman whose only duties this season, save for a few passes, have been to hand off to RBs in a clock-killing offense. Persa's ability to escape pressure and pick up yards on the ground will be badly missed in NU's offense.
Persa works harder than anyone else on the team and is an excellent leader, a winner. At least Watkins has a week of practice to get ready.
Quote from: R-V on November 13, 2010, 05:43:18 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:36:50 PM
Illinois could very well lose to the Cats in the Ricketts Bowl next week and have their once-presumed Bowl eligibility riding on that trip to Fresno St. That will be no cakewalk, octaroons. I guess people are happy with Zook though still? Even after today's tardfest, he should keep his jorb as the all-world recruiter and let those other dipshits manage the team? Fuck it, it works for me.
Classic Zook loss today. At home, on senior day, to a winless team, with a shit ton of missed tackles and penalties to close the deal.
Fuck my goddamn gutless fucking alma mater.
It's always nice to be brought back to earth. Thanks, Illinois. Don't ever forget your roots.
Quote from: Slaky on November 13, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
Quote from: R-V on November 13, 2010, 05:43:18 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:36:50 PM
Illinois could very well lose to the Cats in the Ricketts Bowl next week and have their once-presumed Bowl eligibility riding on that trip to Fresno St. That will be no cakewalk, octaroons. I guess people are happy with Zook though still? Even after today's tardfest, he should keep his jorb as the all-world recruiter and let those other dipshits manage the team? Fuck it, it works for me.
Classic Zook loss today. At home, on senior day, to a winless team, with a shit ton of missed tackles and penalties to close the deal.
Fuck my goddamn gutless fucking alma mater.
It's always nice to be brought back to earth. Thanks, Illinois. Don't ever forget your roots.
I don't know who I hate more: Zook or myself for believing maybe things had changed.
Quote from: SKO on November 14, 2010, 05:26:21 PM
Quote from: Slaky on November 13, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
Quote from: R-V on November 13, 2010, 05:43:18 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:36:50 PM
Illinois could very well lose to the Cats in the Ricketts Bowl next week and have their once-presumed Bowl eligibility riding on that trip to Fresno St. That will be no cakewalk, octaroons. I guess people are happy with Zook though still? Even after today's tardfest, he should keep his jorb as the all-world recruiter and let those other dipshits manage the team? Fuck it, it works for me.
Classic Zook loss today. At home, on senior day, to a winless team, with a shit ton of missed tackles and penalties to close the deal.
Fuck my goddamn gutless fucking alma mater.
It's always nice to be brought back to earth. Thanks, Illinois. Don't ever forget your roots.
I don't know who I hate more: Zook or myself for believing maybe things had changed.
go bleu
Quote from: SKO on November 14, 2010, 05:26:21 PM
Quote from: Slaky on November 13, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
Quote from: R-V on November 13, 2010, 05:43:18 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 02:36:50 PM
Illinois could very well lose to the Cats in the Ricketts Bowl next week and have their once-presumed Bowl eligibility riding on that trip to Fresno St. That will be no cakewalk, octaroons. I guess people are happy with Zook though still? Even after today's tardfest, he should keep his jorb as the all-world recruiter and let those other dipshits manage the team? Fuck it, it works for me.
Classic Zook loss today. At home, on senior day, to a winless team, with a shit ton of missed tackles and penalties to close the deal.
Fuck my goddamn gutless fucking alma mater.
It's always nice to be brought back to earth. Thanks, Illinois. Don't ever forget your roots.
I don't know who I hate more: Zook or myself for believing maybe things had changed.
This. :sadface:
Quote from: Brownie on November 13, 2010, 04:30:29 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 03:08:55 PM
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
Indiana's football team lost to Penn State 2-1 today in the Big Ten semis at State College. The Hoosiers do not have any other squad playing anything resembling "football."
(Pause) to this entire post.
On the positive side, Purdue's really bad this year too. So IU should totally be able to not lose by 50 to them this year.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 15, 2010, 09:21:11 AM
Quote from: Brownie on November 13, 2010, 04:30:29 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 03:08:55 PM
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
Indiana's football team lost to Penn State 2-1 today in the Big Ten semis at State College. The Hoosiers do not have any other squad playing anything resembling "football."
(Pause) to this entire post.
On the positive side, Purdue's really bad this year too. So IU should totally be able to not lose by 50 to them this year.
Will they have anyone left to play for the Old Oaken Bucket after Saturday's "home" game in Washington?
Quote from: Brownie on November 15, 2010, 09:55:08 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 15, 2010, 09:21:11 AM
Quote from: Brownie on November 13, 2010, 04:30:29 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 03:08:55 PM
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
Indiana's football team lost to Penn State 2-1 today in the Big Ten semis at State College. The Hoosiers do not have any other squad playing anything resembling "football."
(Pause) to this entire post.
On the positive side, Purdue's really bad this year too. So IU should totally be able to not lose by 50 to them this year.
Will they have anyone left to play for the Old Oaken Bucket after Saturday's "home" game in Washington?
Who?
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 15, 2010, 11:44:26 AM
Quote from: Brownie on November 15, 2010, 09:55:08 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 15, 2010, 09:21:11 AM
Quote from: Brownie on November 13, 2010, 04:30:29 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 03:08:55 PM
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
Indiana's football team lost to Penn State 2-1 today in the Big Ten semis at State College. The Hoosiers do not have any other squad playing anything resembling "football."
(Pause) to this entire post.
On the positive side, Purdue's really bad this year too. So IU should totally be able to not lose by 50 to them this year.
Will they have anyone left to play for the Old Oaken Bucket after Saturday's "home" game in Washington?
Who?
The team that dresses in crimson and calls themselves the "Hoosiers." They're going to "host" Penn State at FedEx Field. Cute.
Quote from: Brownie on November 15, 2010, 11:59:31 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 15, 2010, 11:44:26 AM
Quote from: Brownie on November 15, 2010, 09:55:08 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 15, 2010, 09:21:11 AM
Quote from: Brownie on November 13, 2010, 04:30:29 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 13, 2010, 03:08:55 PM
Were Winconsin's 83 points against Indiana a significant number?
Indiana's football team lost to Penn State 2-1 today in the Big Ten semis at State College. The Hoosiers do not have any other squad playing anything resembling "football."
(Pause) to this entire post.
On the positive side, Purdue's really bad this year too. So IU should totally be able to not lose by 50 to them this year.
Will they have anyone left to play for the Old Oaken Bucket after Saturday's "home" game in Washington?
Who?
The team that dresses in crimson and calls themselves the "Hoosiers." They're going to "host" Penn State at FedEx Field. Cute.
Wait. What? Nothing about that makes even the slightest damn bit of sense.
Ahem.....
WHY THE FUCK DID YOU PUT IN EDDIE MCGEE? I FUCKING HATE YOU ZOOK. NORTHWESTERN CAN'T EVEN THINK ABOUT SLOWING DOWN THE RUN GAME AND YOU CALL A TRICK FUCKING PLAY WITH EDDIE MCGEE? HAS EDDIE MCGEE EVER THROWN A PASS THAT WASN'T A FUCKING INTERCEPTION? I HATE EVERYTHING ABOUT YOUR WORTHLESS FUCKING PEABRAIN.
Thank God LeShoure and Ford are raping NW. That McGee play was stupid in so many ways. He's thrown 13 passes this year. 4 of them have been picked off. He should never, ever, throw another pass.
At this point, LeShoure has 327 yards and the Illinois team has close to 500 yards rushing. Holy crap.
Northwestern is shit.
Quote from: Slaky on November 20, 2010, 05:40:25 PM
At this point, LeShoure has 327 yards and the Illinois team has close to 500 yards rushing. Holy crap.
Northwestern is shit.
Bowl eligibility, bitches.
Quote from: Slaky on November 20, 2010, 05:40:25 PM
At this point, LeShoure has 327 yards and the Illinois team has close to 500 yards rushing. Holy crap.
Northwestern is shit.
Be careful how you talk about CHICAGO'S BIG TEN TEAM!!1!&$
Quote from: Slaky on November 20, 2010, 05:40:25 PM
At this point, LeShoure has 327 yards and the Illinois team has close to 500 yards rushing. Holy crap.
Northwestern is shit.
In that game, yeah. They really missed Persa, and the defense was typical Northwestern defense.
Quote from: Night Man on November 20, 2010, 07:26:36 PM
Quote from: Slaky on November 20, 2010, 05:40:25 PM
At this point, LeShoure has 327 yards and the Illinois team has close to 500 yards rushing. Holy crap.
Northwestern is shit.
In that game, yeah. They really missed Persa, and the defense was typical Northwestern defense.
Optional?
Tough first year for Brian Kelly, ya think? (http://www.wgntv.com/wgntv-notre-dame-mum-on-death-nov21,0,2666358.story)
QuoteNOTRE DAME, Indiana — According to a Chicago Tribune investigation, Notre Dame is refusing to publicly acknowledge that one of its football players allegedly sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman from Northbrook, who later committed suicide.
Elizabeth Seeberg was a freshman at neighboring St. Mary's College when the assault reportedly happened inside a dorm room August 31.
She reported it to police the next day and Seeberg was interviewed by police.
Seeberg provided two written statements and pointed out the football player.
The football player remains uncharged and is still on the Notre Dame football team.
The player has not responded to e-mail messages by the Tribune seeking comment.
The university would not allow coach Brian Kelly to comment on the allegation against his player, saying any such incident "would be addressed institutionally, not by the football coach."
In the month's since Seeberg's death in September, the university and its police force have denied formal requests for information from the Chicago Tribune, asserting it is not bound by open records laws that make public reports filed at Indiana police departments
Considering this was already knowledge amongst the team since September, I guess Kelly could say he was distracted when he let Declan Sullivan twist in the wind.
Quote from: PANK! on November 21, 2010, 07:25:04 AM
Tough first year for Brian Kelly, ya think? (http://www.wgntv.com/wgntv-notre-dame-mum-on-death-nov21,0,2666358.story)
QuoteNOTRE DAME, Indiana — According to a Chicago Tribune investigation, Notre Dame is refusing to publicly acknowledge that one of its football players allegedly sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman from Northbrook, who later committed suicide.
Elizabeth Seeberg was a freshman at neighboring St. Mary's College when the assault reportedly happened inside a dorm room August 31.
She reported it to police the next day and Seeberg was interviewed by police.
Seeberg provided two written statements and pointed out the football player.
The football player remains uncharged and is still on the Notre Dame football team.
The player has not responded to e-mail messages by the Tribune seeking comment.
The university would not allow coach Brian Kelly to comment on the allegation against his player, saying any such incident "would be addressed institutionally, not by the football coach."
In the month's since Seeberg's death in September, the university and its police force have denied formal requests for information from the Chicago Tribune, asserting it is not bound by open records laws that make public reports filed at Indiana police departments
Considering this was already knowledge amongst the team since September, I guess Kelly could say he was distracted when he let Declan Sullivan twist in the wind.
The important thing is fuck Notre Dame. What a shitty hypocritical institution. I wouldn't expect anything better out of the organization that committed every kind of recruiting violation known to man under Lou Holtz and then sent him out into the world to preach to the rest of us about Heart and Integrity.
Quote from: SKO on November 21, 2010, 12:01:13 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 21, 2010, 07:25:04 AM
Tough first year for Brian Kelly, ya think? (http://www.wgntv.com/wgntv-notre-dame-mum-on-death-nov21,0,2666358.story)
QuoteNOTRE DAME, Indiana — According to a Chicago Tribune investigation, Notre Dame is refusing to publicly acknowledge that one of its football players allegedly sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman from Northbrook, who later committed suicide.
Elizabeth Seeberg was a freshman at neighboring St. Mary's College when the assault reportedly happened inside a dorm room August 31.
She reported it to police the next day and Seeberg was interviewed by police.
Seeberg provided two written statements and pointed out the football player.
The football player remains uncharged and is still on the Notre Dame football team.
The player has not responded to e-mail messages by the Tribune seeking comment.
The university would not allow coach Brian Kelly to comment on the allegation against his player, saying any such incident "would be addressed institutionally, not by the football coach."
In the month's since Seeberg's death in September, the university and its police force have denied formal requests for information from the Chicago Tribune, asserting it is not bound by open records laws that make public reports filed at Indiana police departments
Considering this was already knowledge amongst the team since September, I guess Kelly could say he was distracted when he let Declan Sullivan twist in the wind.
The important thing is fuck Notre Dame. What a shitty hypocritical institution. I wouldn't expect anything better out of the organization that committed every kind of recruiting violation known to man under Lou Holtz and then sent him out into the world to preach to the rest of us about Heart and Integrity.
Lou Holtz is a big turd.
Northern, bitches.
Quote from: PANK! on November 22, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Northern, bitches.
As a Ball State grad, and Notre Dame fan, you are really making me hate this thread.
Quote from: Tony on November 22, 2010, 01:02:49 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 22, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Northern, bitches.
As a Ball State grad, and Notre Dame fan, you are really making me hate this thread.
Those are some bone-headed things to be. Not that I've done any better.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 22, 2010, 01:03:47 PM
Quote from: Tony on November 22, 2010, 01:02:49 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 22, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Northern, bitches.
As a Ball State grad, and Notre Dame fan, you are really making me hate this thread.
Those are some bone-headed things to be. Not that I've done any better.
I know, but Huey doesn't have to keep reminding me.
Quote from: Tony on November 22, 2010, 01:09:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 22, 2010, 01:03:47 PM
Quote from: Tony on November 22, 2010, 01:02:49 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 22, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Northern, bitches.
As a Ball State grad, and Notre Dame fan, you are really making me hate this thread.
Those are some bone-headed things to be. Not that I've done any better.
I know, but Huey doesn't have to keep reminding me.
He doesn't really have much else going for him. So he might as well.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 22, 2010, 01:12:33 PM
Quote from: Tony on November 22, 2010, 01:09:54 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 22, 2010, 01:03:47 PM
Quote from: Tony on November 22, 2010, 01:02:49 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 22, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Northern, bitches.
As a Ball State grad, and Notre Dame fan, you are really making me hate this thread.
Those are some bone-headed things to be. Not that I've done any better.
I know, but Huey doesn't have to keep reminding me.
He doesn't really have much else going for him. So he might as well.
One of the few times I can deal with being lumped in with a potatohead.
NIU, bitches!
Quote from: Tony on November 22, 2010, 01:02:49 PM
Quote from: PANK! on November 22, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Northern, bitches.
As a Ball State grad, and Notre Dame fan, you are really making me hate this thread.
Cheer up. BSU axed Stan Parrish tonight.
Worst. Season. Ever.
Apex, you should've just quit paying attention in September... Like I end up doing most seasons.
TCU! TCU! TCU! I've been saying it alllllllllllllllll season.
Other Big Ten games in review: Wisconsin has scored 70 on Northwestern, Iowa somehow lost to Minnesota a couple weeks after Illinois somehow lost to the Gophers, Michigan State gutted out Happy Valley, and Michigan got another richly-deserved beatdown.
Everything Iowa suffered this year is karmic retribution for Chuck and DaveB trying to lobby them into the title game last year.
Quote from: SKO on November 27, 2010, 06:29:15 PM
Everything Iowa suffered this year is karmic retribution for Chuck and DaveB trying to lobby them into the title game last year.
Turncoat.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 27, 2010, 03:08:17 PM
Worst. Season. Ever.
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
Lynch has been fired.
Rumor says Gruden is taking the Miami job. That has the potential to be all kinds of fucking hilarious.
Quote from: Bort on November 28, 2010, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 28, 2010, 07:38:53 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: BC on November 28, 2010, 06:01:07 PM
Lynch has been fired.
Who?
Quote from: Brownie on November 27, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
That doesn't answer the question.
No. No it doesn't.
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 08:04:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on November 28, 2010, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 28, 2010, 07:38:53 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: BC on November 28, 2010, 06:01:07 PM
Lynch has been fired.
Who?
Quote from: Brownie on November 27, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
That doesn't answer the question.
No. No it doesn't.
I think he was talking about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGdHLLbS_LI
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 28, 2010, 11:55:31 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 08:04:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on November 28, 2010, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 28, 2010, 07:38:53 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: BC on November 28, 2010, 06:01:07 PM
Lynch has been fired.
Who?
Quote from: Brownie on November 27, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
That doesn't answer the question.
No. No it doesn't.
I think he was talking about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGdHLLbS_LI
Looks like I'll be pleading "white" again on this one.
It's looking like Oregon and Auburn for the BCS. That might be as good as it gets. Thank God those piss ant Boise State smurfturfers lost. It was a shitty way to lose, though.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 28, 2010, 11:55:31 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 08:04:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on November 28, 2010, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 28, 2010, 07:38:53 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: BC on November 28, 2010, 06:01:07 PM
Lynch has been fired.
Who?
Quote from: Brownie on November 27, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
That doesn't answer the question.
No. No it doesn't.
I think he was talking about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGdHLLbS_LI
Not only was that not funny, but it also sucked.
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 29, 2010, 08:40:28 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 28, 2010, 11:55:31 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 08:04:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on November 28, 2010, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 28, 2010, 07:38:53 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: BC on November 28, 2010, 06:01:07 PM
Lynch has been fired.
Who?
Quote from: Brownie on November 27, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
That doesn't answer the question.
No. No it doesn't.
I think he was talking about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGdHLLbS_LI
Looks like I'll be pleading "white" again on this one.
Guilty.
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 29, 2010, 10:06:36 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 29, 2010, 08:40:28 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 28, 2010, 11:55:31 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 08:04:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on November 28, 2010, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 28, 2010, 07:38:53 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: BC on November 28, 2010, 06:01:07 PM
Lynch has been fired.
Who?
Quote from: Brownie on November 27, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
That doesn't answer the question.
No. No it doesn't.
I think he was talking about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGdHLLbS_LI
Looks like I'll be pleading "white" again on this one.
Guilty.
(http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q183/zeravla134/IM1_Minor_Threat.jpg)
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on November 29, 2010, 08:43:43 AM
It's looking like Oregon and Auburn for the BCS. That might be as good as it gets. Thank God those piss ant Boise State smurfturfers lost. It was a shitty way to lose, though.
TCU TCU
Quote from: Bort on November 29, 2010, 10:22:57 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 29, 2010, 10:06:36 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 29, 2010, 08:40:28 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on November 28, 2010, 11:55:31 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 08:04:56 PM
Quote from: Bort on November 28, 2010, 07:55:48 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on November 28, 2010, 07:38:53 PM
Quote from: JD on November 28, 2010, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: BC on November 28, 2010, 06:01:07 PM
Lynch has been fired.
Who?
Quote from: Brownie on November 27, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Bill Lynch's job might have just been saved- -by Northwestern.
That doesn't answer the question.
No. No it doesn't.
I think he was talking about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGdHLLbS_LI
Looks like I'll be pleading "white" again on this one.
Guilty.
(http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q183/zeravla134/IM1_Minor_Threat.jpg)
I didn't know Brian Baker was Quebecois.
Quote from: Yeti on November 29, 2010, 10:25:35 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on November 29, 2010, 08:43:43 AM
It's looking like Oregon and Auburn for the BCS. That might be as good as it gets. Thank God those piss ant Boise State smurfturfers lost. It was a shitty way to lose, though.
TCU TCU
No, goddamnit. No.
Quote from: Yeti on November 29, 2010, 10:25:35 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on November 29, 2010, 08:43:43 AM
It's looking like Oregon and Auburn for the BCS. That might be as good as it gets. Thank God those piss ant Boise State smurfturfers lost. It was a shitty way to lose, though.
TCU TCU
Oregon gets beat by the Fighting Jerry Matherses and Auburn bends over for the 'Cocks from the other USC. TCU vs. Stanford for it all!!!!
Quote from: JD on November 29, 2010, 05:57:25 PM
Quote from: Yeti on November 29, 2010, 10:25:35 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on November 29, 2010, 08:43:43 AM
It's looking like Oregon and Auburn for the BCS. That might be as good as it gets. Thank God those piss ant Boise State smurfturfers lost. It was a shitty way to lose, though.
TCU TCU
Oregon gets beat by the Fighting Jerry Matherses and Auburn bends over for the 'Cocks from the other USC. TCU vs. Stanford for it all!!!!
I think I would shoot off like Bugs Bunny on the moon more than my coming of age time.
Quote from: Yeti on November 29, 2010, 07:09:06 PM
Quote from: JD on November 29, 2010, 05:57:25 PM
Quote from: Yeti on November 29, 2010, 10:25:35 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on November 29, 2010, 08:43:43 AM
It's looking like Oregon and Auburn for the BCS. That might be as good as it gets. Thank God those piss ant Boise State smurfturfers lost. It was a shitty way to lose, though.
TCU TCU
Oregon gets beat by the Fighting Jerry Matherses and Auburn bends over for the 'Cocks from the other USC. TCU vs. Stanford for it all!!!!
I think I would shoot off like Bugs Bunny on the moon more than my coming of age time.
But not more than
her coming of age, right?
Quote from: JD on November 29, 2010, 05:57:25 PM
Quote from: Yeti on November 29, 2010, 10:25:35 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on November 29, 2010, 08:43:43 AM
It's looking like Oregon and Auburn for the BCS. That might be as good as it gets. Thank God those piss ant Boise State smurfturfers lost. It was a shitty way to lose, though.
TCU TCU
Oregon gets beat by the Fighting Jerry Matherses and Auburn bends over for the 'Cocks from the other USC. TCU vs. Stanford for it all!!!!
It would be some of the worst football since forever.
NIU, bitches. (http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/34114/boise-state-drops-northern-illinois-ranked)
Quote from: PANK! on November 30, 2010, 09:10:18 AM
NIU, bitches. (http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/34114/boise-state-drops-northern-illinois-ranked)
Gotta face the Cradle on Friday.
(http://product.images.fansedge.com/44-29/44-29895-F.jpg)
DPD.
So Miami is ranked 24th now.
Right?
24 hours later and I'm still depressed about that game.
That Miami QB could become another Rapelisberger even though he looks like he's 14 now.
So Oklahoma, Virginia Tech, and UConn win setting your matchups as
National Championship
Auburn vs. Oregon
Rose
Wisconsin vs. TCU
Sugar Bowl
Arkansas vs. Ohio State
Orange Bowl
Virginia Tech vs. UConn
Fiesta Bowl
Oklahoma vs. Stanford
My guesses in italics. Well, my guesses and just about everyone else. I'm good with all of those matchups other than the increasingly irrelevant Orange Bowl, but I can't really remember the last time I gave a shit about that it anyway.
Quote from: SKO on December 04, 2010, 11:17:45 PM
So Oklahoma, Virginia Tech, and UConn win setting your matchups as
National Championship
Auburn vs. Oregon
Rose
Wisconsin vs. TCU
Sugar Bowl
Arkansas vs. Ohio State
Orange Bowl
Virginia Tech vs. UConn
Fiesta Bowl
Oklahoma vs. Stanford
My guesses in italics. Well, my guesses and just about everyone else. I'm good with all of those matchups other than the increasingly irrelevant Orange Bowl, but I can't really remember the last time I gave a shit about that it anyway.
I keep seeing these and wondering, why wouldn't Wisconsin play Stranford and OK play TCU?
Quote from: Oleg on December 05, 2010, 01:34:50 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 04, 2010, 11:17:45 PM
So Oklahoma, Virginia Tech, and UConn win setting your matchups as
National Championship
Auburn vs. Oregon
Rose
Wisconsin vs. TCU
Sugar Bowl
Arkansas vs. Ohio State
Orange Bowl
Virginia Tech vs. UConn
Fiesta Bowl
Oklahoma vs. Stanford
My guesses in italics. Well, my guesses and just about everyone else. I'm good with all of those matchups other than the increasingly irrelevant Orange Bowl, but I can't really remember the last time I gave a shit about that it anyway.
I keep seeing these and wondering, why wouldn't Wisconsin play Stranford and OK play TCU?
New Rose Bowl rules state that if the Pac 10 champ or Big Ten Champ is in the title game, they have to take the highest ranked BCS team. Which is TCU
Quote from: SKO on December 05, 2010, 01:53:15 PM
Quote from: Oleg on December 05, 2010, 01:34:50 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 04, 2010, 11:17:45 PM
So Oklahoma, Virginia Tech, and UConn win setting your matchups as
National Championship
Auburn vs. Oregon
Rose
Wisconsin vs. TCU
Sugar Bowl
Arkansas vs. Ohio State
Orange Bowl
Virginia Tech vs. UConn
Fiesta Bowl
Oklahoma vs. Stanford
My guesses in italics. Well, my guesses and just about everyone else. I'm good with all of those matchups other than the increasingly irrelevant Orange Bowl, but I can't really remember the last time I gave a shit about that it anyway.
I keep seeing these and wondering, why wouldn't Wisconsin play Stranford and OK play TCU?
New Rose Bowl rules state that if the Pac 10 champ or Big Ten Champ is in the title game, they have to take the highest ranked BCS team. Which is TCU
That's a good rule. Especially because it fucks two of my least favorite teams right up the giggy.
NIU's Jerry Kill hired by the Gophers.
Illini to play Baylor in the Texas Bowl in Houston.
Northwestern will play Texas Tech in the TicketCity Bowl in Dallas on Jan. 1.
Looks like Iowa will play Missouri in the Insight Bowl in Phoenix.
By the way, that Rose Bowl non-AQ rule is a one-time thing that the Rose Bowl agreed to after the other BCS bowls complained about having to continually pick up schools like TCU, Boise State, Utah and Hawaii...
Did anyone else see the horrible spot in the Illini-Fresno game Friday night? Just horrible. Illinois didn't deserve to win, but how can Fresno wonder why schools will never play them at home when calls like that are made?
Some awesome bowl games:
uDrove Humanitarian Bowl
Beef O'Brady's St. Petersburg Bowl
SD County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl
Franklin American Mortgage Music City Bowl
Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl.
Good lord. All the other shameless corporately owned matchups here: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5168379
Quote from: SKO on December 05, 2010, 11:33:20 PM
Some awesome bowl games:
uDrove Humanitarian Bowl
Beef O'Brady's St. Petersburg Bowl
SD County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl
Franklin American Mortgage Music City Bowl
Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl.
Good lord. All the other shameless corporately owned matchups here: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5168379
I can't wait for the Smirnoff Vladivostok Bowl
Quote from: Slaky on December 05, 2010, 06:09:02 PM
NIU's Jerry Kill hired by the Gophers.
Aw, fuck. (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5888840) Oh well.
Also, "Jerry Kill Gophers" isn't nearly as fun of a Google search as I'd imagined it would be.
Quote from: Oleg on December 06, 2010, 07:20:58 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 05, 2010, 06:09:02 PM
NIU's Jerry Kill hired by the Gophers.
Aw, fuck. (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5888840) Oh well.
Also, "Jerry Kill Gophers" isn't nearly as fun of a Google search as I'd imagined it would be.
Kill was SIU's coach when they upset Northern, and then Northern hired him. Northern upset Minnesota this year, and now Minnesota hires him.
I don't know what this means, other than if Minnesota beats Illinois again that rosy-cheeked beaver might be your coach in 2012.
Quote from: PANK! on December 06, 2010, 08:44:41 AM
Quote from: Oleg on December 06, 2010, 07:20:58 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 05, 2010, 06:09:02 PM
NIU's Jerry Kill hired by the Gophers.
Aw, fuck. (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5888840) Oh well.
Also, "Jerry Kill Gophers" isn't nearly as fun of a Google search as I'd imagined it would be.
Kill was SIU's coach when they upset Northern, and then Northern hired him. Northern upset Minnesota this year, and now Minnesota hires him.
I don't know what this means, other than if Minnesota beats Illinois again that rosy-cheeked beaver might be your coach in 2012.
You keep using that word...
Cotton Bowl!
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 06, 2010, 10:22:09 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on December 06, 2010, 09:58:50 AM
Cotton Bowl!
COTTON BEARS COTTON BOWL!
Wait, what were we doing?
In a moment of weakness, I laughed very, very hard at that.
Quote from: Bort on December 06, 2010, 10:27:25 AM
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 06, 2010, 10:22:09 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on December 06, 2010, 09:58:50 AM
Cotton Bowl!
COTTON BEARS COTTON BOWL!
Wait, what were we doing?
In a moment of weakness, I laughed very, very hard at that.
You must have chiefed it up real good before work.
Quote from: Internet Apex on December 06, 2010, 10:22:09 AM
Quote from: Powdered Toast Man on December 06, 2010, 09:58:50 AM
Cotton Bowl!
COTTON BEARS COTTON BOWL!
Wait, what were we doing?
(http://chicagobreakingbusiness.com/files/2010/08/charmin-bears.jpg)
Quote from: BC on December 05, 2010, 06:45:59 PM
By the way, that Rose Bowl non-AQ rule is a one-time thing that the Rose Bowl agreed to after the other BCS bowls complained about having to continually pick up schools like TCU, Boise State, Utah and Hawaii...
Did anyone else see the horrible spot in the Illini-Fresno game Friday night? Just horrible. Illinois didn't deserve to win, but how can Fresno wonder why schools will never play them at home when calls like that are made?
Wisconsin vowed never to play in Fresno again after they got WAC-ed by the refs last time out there.
I'm getting tired of seeing Army get its ass kicked by Navy every damn year.
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on December 11, 2010, 02:30:00 PM
I'm getting tired of seeing Army get its ass kicked by Navy every damn year.
Me and you, both.
College Football Bowl Pick 'em.
Group ID: 24152
Password: picks
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/bowl
Legends
Leaders
I didn't think it possible for the Big 10 logo to make LESS sense, but SUCCESS!
(http://www.insidethehall.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/BTC-Stacked.jpg)
Quote from: Kermit IV on December 13, 2010, 04:41:58 PM
I didn't think it possible for the Big 10 logo to make LESS sense, but SUCCESS!
(http://www.insidethehall.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/BTC-Stacked.jpg)
So, there's no "2" in there that I'm failing to see?
Quote from: Yeti on December 13, 2010, 09:10:07 PM
Quote from: Kermit IV on December 13, 2010, 04:41:58 PM
I didn't think it possible for the Big 10 logo to make LESS sense, but SUCCESS!
(http://www.insidethehall.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/BTC-Stacked.jpg)
So, there's no "2" in there that I'm failing to see?
Turn the "N" counterclockwise: Boom.
Quote from: PenPho on December 13, 2010, 10:18:08 AM
College Football Bowl Pick 'em.
Group ID: 24152
Password: picks
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/bowl
BUMP for more teams.
Quote from: PenPho on December 16, 2010, 07:16:07 PM
Quote from: PenPho on December 13, 2010, 10:18:08 AM
College Football Bowl Pick 'em.
Group ID: 24152
Password: picks
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/bowl
BUMP for more teams.
Last year I won this damn thing on sheer blind luck. This year I watched less college football than any other season in the history of college football. The only way I can win is not to play.
It's not Stacey Robinson rushing for 300 yards on Homecoming Day, 1990 to beat a 24th ranked Fresno St team in Dekalb, but Humanitarian Bowl Champs, Ogdens!
(http://cabanacharleysofsycamore.com/images/NIU_Huskies.jpg)
Quote from: Oleg on December 18, 2010, 07:42:29 PM
It's not Stacey Robinson rushing for 300 yards on Homecoming Day, 1990 to beat a 24th ranked Fresno St team in Dekalb, but Humanitarian Bowl Champs, Ogdens!
(http://cabanacharleysofsycamore.com/images/NIU_Huskies.jpg)
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
Quote from: Oleg on December 19, 2010, 06:42:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
And blocked DeMarcus Ware. Check out their rushing totals. He did fine work on him.
Quote from: Slaky on December 19, 2010, 09:41:09 PM
Quote from: Oleg on December 19, 2010, 06:42:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
And blocked DeMarcus Ware. Check out their rushing totals. He did fine work on him.
Damn. I always knew--as a matter of pointless trivia--that DeMarcus Ware's last college game was a loss to NIU in a bowl game that no longer exists--but did not know baby Cieslak put the stop on him. Awesome.
Quote from: PANK! on December 20, 2010, 09:51:58 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 19, 2010, 09:41:09 PM
Quote from: Oleg on December 19, 2010, 06:42:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
And blocked DeMarcus Ware. Check out their rushing totals. He did fine work on him.
Damn. I always knew--as a matter of pointless trivia--that DeMarcus Ware's last college game was a loss to NIU in a bowl game that no longer exists--but did not know baby Cieslak put the stop on him. Awesome.
The better question is how a guy like DeMarcus Ware went unrecruited to the point of ending up at Troy and how baby Cieslak isn't missing blocks in the Bears backfield at a much lower price than Brandon Manumaleuna.
Quote from: SKO on December 20, 2010, 09:56:03 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 20, 2010, 09:51:58 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 19, 2010, 09:41:09 PM
Quote from: Oleg on December 19, 2010, 06:42:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
And blocked DeMarcus Ware. Check out their rushing totals. He did fine work on him.
Damn. I always knew--as a matter of pointless trivia--that DeMarcus Ware's last college game was a loss to NIU in a bowl game that no longer exists--but did not know baby Cieslak put the stop on him. Awesome.
The better question is how a guy like DeMarcus Ware went unrecruited to the point of ending up at Troy and how baby Cieslak isn't missing blocks in the Bears backfield at a much lower price than Brandon Manumaleuna.
If it makes you feel any better, both of the people in your question were unrecruited and only one of them is currently sleeping on my couch.
Quote from: SKO on December 20, 2010, 09:56:03 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 20, 2010, 09:51:58 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 19, 2010, 09:41:09 PM
Quote from: Oleg on December 19, 2010, 06:42:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
And blocked DeMarcus Ware. Check out their rushing totals. He did fine work on him.
Damn. I always knew--as a matter of pointless trivia--that DeMarcus Ware's last college game was a loss to NIU in a bowl game that no longer exists--but did not know baby Cieslak put the stop on him. Awesome.
The better question is how a guy like DeMarcus Ware went unrecruited to the point of ending up at Troy and how baby Cieslak isn't missing blocks in the Bears backfield at a much lower price than Brandon Manumaleuna.
Well the Bears are stockpiling TEs so why not add another? Then we can hear Slaky talk about the joys of watching his brother win the SB
Quote from: Slaky on December 20, 2010, 09:58:38 AM
Quote from: SKO on December 20, 2010, 09:56:03 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 20, 2010, 09:51:58 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 19, 2010, 09:41:09 PM
Quote from: Oleg on December 19, 2010, 06:42:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
And blocked DeMarcus Ware. Check out their rushing totals. He did fine work on him.
Damn. I always knew--as a matter of pointless trivia--that DeMarcus Ware's last college game was a loss to NIU in a bowl game that no longer exists--but did not know baby Cieslak put the stop on him. Awesome.
The better question is how a guy like DeMarcus Ware went unrecruited to the point of ending up at Troy and how baby Cieslak isn't missing blocks in the Bears backfield at a much lower price than Brandon Manumaleuna.
If it makes you feel any better, both of the people in your question were unrecruited and only one of them is currently sleeping on my couch.
That doesn't make me feel better at all. Outside of the occasional belly-jiggling reception, I don't see why Brandon Manumaleuna is doing something a guy sleeping on Slaky's coach could do for 2.6 million less per year.
Jerry Angelo is so fucking lucky Julius Peppers' awesomeness is hiding the glaring stupidity of giving Taylor and Manu a combined 9 years and 27.5 million. I know probably fewer than three of those years and a third of that money is guaranteed, but all of that is too much money for bad players.
Quote from: SKO on December 20, 2010, 10:05:21 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 20, 2010, 09:58:38 AM
Quote from: SKO on December 20, 2010, 09:56:03 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 20, 2010, 09:51:58 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 19, 2010, 09:41:09 PM
Quote from: Oleg on December 19, 2010, 06:42:14 AM
Quote from: Slaky on December 18, 2010, 08:20:25 PM
Dude.
2004 Silicon Bowl Champs. Way sweeter.
(http://www.billszone.com/mtimages/2005draft/te/1101s_dawid_fball_89_2.jpg)
Nice. Led the team in receiving that game, I see.
And blocked DeMarcus Ware. Check out their rushing totals. He did fine work on him.
Damn. I always knew--as a matter of pointless trivia--that DeMarcus Ware's last college game was a loss to NIU in a bowl game that no longer exists--but did not know baby Cieslak put the stop on him. Awesome.
The better question is how a guy like DeMarcus Ware went unrecruited to the point of ending up at Troy and how baby Cieslak isn't missing blocks in the Bears backfield at a much lower price than Brandon Manumaleuna.
If it makes you feel any better, both of the people in your question were unrecruited and only one of them is currently sleeping on my couch.
That doesn't make me feel better at all. Outside of the occasional belly-jiggling reception, I don't see why Brandon Manumaleuna is doing something a guy sleeping on Slaky's coach could do for 2.6 million less per year.
Jerry Angelo is so fucking lucky Julius Peppers' awesomeness is hiding the glaring stupidity of giving Taylor and Manu a combined 9 years and 27.5 million. I know probably fewer than three of those years and a third of that money is guaranteed, but all of that is too much money for bad players.
His career is over - his back and knees are shot.
The Taylor and Malaadfnammama signings do become more and more baffling by the week. However, if Brandon M. can somehow get in the way of enough defenders to allow Forte to pick up the 10 points I need to get to the finals, I'll be all grins.
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
Quote from: SKO on December 29, 2010, 09:41:14 PM
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
I'm just savoring tonight's triumph right now. The last time they won a bowl game, future Pro Bowler Kurt Kittner was at the helm, Slick Willie was still in office and our nation hadn't yet been devastated by the Y2K disaster. It's been awhile.
Quote from: R-V on December 29, 2010, 10:09:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 29, 2010, 09:41:14 PM
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
I'm just savoring tonight's triumph right now. The last time they won a bowl game, future Pro Bowler Kurt Kittner was at the helm, Slick Willie was still in office and our nation hadn't yet been devastated by the Y2K disaster. It's been awhile.
How big of a cockbag is Zook? Jeebus.
Quote from: R-V on December 29, 2010, 10:09:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 29, 2010, 09:41:14 PM
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
I'm just savoring tonight's triumph right now. The last time they won a bowl game, future Pro Bowler Kurt Kittner was at the helm, Slick Willie was still in office and our nation hadn't yet been devastated by the Y2K disaster. It's been awhile.
Kurt Kittner fucking Destroyed Virginia.
Quote from: SKO on December 30, 2010, 09:56:53 AM
Quote from: R-V on December 29, 2010, 10:09:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 29, 2010, 09:41:14 PM
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
I'm just savoring tonight's triumph right now. The last time they won a bowl game, future Pro Bowler Kurt Kittner was at the helm, Slick Willie was still in office and our nation hadn't yet been devastated by the Y2K disaster. It's been awhile.
Kurt Kittner fucking Destroyed Virginia.
God that game was amazing.
Quote from: Slaky on December 30, 2010, 10:35:58 AM
Quote from: SKO on December 30, 2010, 09:56:53 AM
Quote from: R-V on December 29, 2010, 10:09:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 29, 2010, 09:41:14 PM
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
I'm just savoring tonight's triumph right now. The last time they won a bowl game, future Pro Bowler Kurt Kittner was at the helm, Slick Willie was still in office and our nation hadn't yet been devastated by the Y2K disaster. It's been awhile.
Kurt Kittner fucking Destroyed Virginia.
God that game was amazing.
And they held future Chicago martyr Thomas Jones to a workmanlike 141 yards on 28 touches. God damn I'm getting old.
Quote from: Slaky on December 30, 2010, 10:35:58 AM
Quote from: SKO on December 30, 2010, 09:56:53 AM
Quote from: R-V on December 29, 2010, 10:09:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 29, 2010, 09:41:14 PM
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
I'm just savoring tonight's triumph right now. The last time they won a bowl game, future Pro Bowler Kurt Kittner was at the helm, Slick Willie was still in office and our nation hadn't yet been devastated by the Y2K disaster. It's been awhile.
Kurt Kittner fucking Destroyed Virginia.
God that game was amazing.
If I remember, Kurt had the trifecta in that game. Rushing, Receiving, and Passing TDs.
Quote from: SKO on December 30, 2010, 12:35:50 PM
Quote from: Slaky on December 30, 2010, 10:35:58 AM
Quote from: SKO on December 30, 2010, 09:56:53 AM
Quote from: R-V on December 29, 2010, 10:09:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on December 29, 2010, 09:41:14 PM
I don't blame LeShoure or anyone for jumping and taking the money when they can get it, but if he stays and Scheelhaase and the defense build on what they did tonight...I like these Illini's chances next year.
I'm just savoring tonight's triumph right now. The last time they won a bowl game, future Pro Bowler Kurt Kittner was at the helm, Slick Willie was still in office and our nation hadn't yet been devastated by the Y2K disaster. It's been awhile.
Kurt Kittner fucking Destroyed Virginia.
God that game was amazing.
If I remember, Kurt had the trifecta in that game. Rushing, Receiving, and Passing TDs.
And he did it all with a watch clipped to his belt IIRC.
Another bowl, another lackluster first quarter, another late comeback comes up short, another loss. See you again next year.
The Big Ten thanks Michigan and Michigan State for playing like shit today.
Penn State and Northwestern, well, at least the finals don't look all that bad.
Quote from: BC on January 01, 2011, 04:16:05 PM
The Big Ten thanks Michigan and Michigan State for playing like shit today.
Penn State and Northwestern, well, at least the finals don't look all that bad.
(http://thefeed.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/03/30/harbaugh_2.jpg)
Wisconsin loses to TCU, 21-19. The Frogs played better, but there were simply some, um, horrible coaching decisions from Bielema as well.
Time to watch hockey.
Quote from: BC on January 01, 2011, 07:08:36 PM
Wisconsin loses to TCU, 21-19. The Frogs played better, but there were simply some, um, horrible coaching decisions from Bielema officiating as well.
Stick to the script!'d.
First the Gints win the World Series, now Stanfoo wins the Orange Bowl. My life is in tatters.
Quote from: CBStew on January 04, 2011, 09:33:41 AM
First the Gints win the World Series, now Stanfoo wins the Orange Bowl. My life is in tatters.
If it's any consolation, no one gives a shit about the Orange Bowl.
Quote from: Slaky on January 04, 2011, 11:41:25 AM
Quote from: CBStew on January 04, 2011, 09:33:41 AM
First the Gints win the World Series, now Stanfoo wins the Orange Bowl. My life is in tatters.
If it's any consolation, no one gives a shit about the Orange Bowl.
I thought they tore that shit down.
Reports out of DEEtroit say RichRod has been fired. (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5988308)
Luck staying. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/06/andrew-luck-staying-stanford_n_805384.html)
Quote from: Oleg on January 07, 2011, 11:15:18 AM
Luck staying. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/06/andrew-luck-staying-stanford_n_805384.html)
(http://cache2.allpostersimages.com/p/LRG/8/855/15RY000Z/posters/kennedy-assassinated.jpg)
Quote from: Oleg on January 07, 2011, 11:15:18 AM
Luck staying. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/06/andrew-luck-staying-stanford_n_805384.html)
Without contributing to the gyros fund. (http://www.gostanford.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/010611aac.html)
Quote from: Oleg on January 07, 2011, 11:15:18 AM
Luck staying. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/06/andrew-luck-staying-stanford_n_805384.html)
In related news... (http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2008/03/dempster-marqui.html)
Quote from: Night Man on January 07, 2011, 11:28:45 AM
Quote from: Oleg on January 07, 2011, 11:15:18 AM
Luck staying. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/06/andrew-luck-staying-stanford_n_805384.html)
Without contributing to the gyros fund. (http://www.gostanford.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/010611aac.html)
Fine. I laughed at 'gyros fund'.
Auburn wins the pretend championship that will probably be vacated in a couple years because ouch that really hurts plus it like totally wipes all of our memories of the event.
Oh and for the love of God, people, quit bitching about Cam Newton. Until the NCAA can tell the difference between it's ass and a hole in the ground when it comes to punishment, no one can be that OUTRAGED. You find me a national champion without a skeleton or 12 in their closet and I'll build you a new cathedral.
Fine. Greed is good and all that. Am I allowed to be offended by the shitty Oregon playcalling when they got stuffed at the goal line in the third quarter? I think John Shoop wrestled away the headset for a few minutes there from the Oregon OC.
Quote from: SKO on January 10, 2011, 11:16:44 PM
Auburn wins the pretend championship that will probably be vacated in a couple years because ouch that really hurts plus it like totally wipes all of our memories of the event.
I wish I could have my memories of that event wiped away. College football sucks.
Quote from: Eli on January 10, 2011, 11:58:23 PM
Quote from: SKO on January 10, 2011, 11:16:44 PM
Auburn wins the pretend championship that will probably be vacated in a couple years because ouch that really hurts plus it like totally wipes all of our memories of the event.
I wish I could have my memories of that event wiped away. College football sucks.
THIS
It was ok up until Oregon's defense went all "Detroit Lions Tackling is Optional, Plus Your QBs a Cheat Deserved Win!" Then I went back to sleep.
Quote from: Reuschels_Jowls on January 10, 2011, 11:42:14 PM
Fine. Greed is good and all that. Am I allowed to be offended by the shitty Oregon playcalling when they got stuffed at the goal line in the third quarter? I think John Shoop wrestled away the headset for a few minutes there from the Oregon OC.
You can be pissed all you want. I didn't really care who won. Well, I wanted Auburn to win so that y'all would have to crown my ass in the bowl pick'em, but I just get annoyed by people working themselves into an outrage over anything in college football. CAM NEWTON SHOULDA BEEN SUSPENDED. Well, he wasn't. So it's not his fault. Get pissed at the NCAA all you want, but the kid played in a game he had the right to play in. I mean how many top programs have been hit with some kind of major recruiting violation? Florida State has had an entire season wiped out. Alabama too. USC, obviously. It's the same as championing a guy like Alex Rodriguez over Barry Bonds only to find out he wasn't clean either. The system is broken. Get over it.
Quote from: SKO on January 11, 2011, 07:40:12 AM
Quote from: Reuschels_Jowls on January 10, 2011, 11:42:14 PM
Fine. Greed is good and all that. Am I allowed to be offended by the shitty Oregon playcalling when they got stuffed at the goal line in the third quarter? I think John Shoop wrestled away the headset for a few minutes there from the Oregon OC.
You can be pissed all you want. I didn't really care who won. Well, I wanted Auburn to win so that y'all would have to crown my ass in the bowl pick'em, but I just get annoyed by people working themselves into an outrage over anything in college football. CAM NEWTON SHOULDA BEEN SUSPENDED. Well, he wasn't. So it's not his fault. Get pissed at the NCAA all you want, but the kid played in a game he had the right to play in. I mean how many top programs have been hit with some kind of major recruiting violation? Florida State has had an entire season wiped out. Alabama too. USC, obviously. It's the same as championing a guy like Alex Rodriguez over Barry Bonds only to find out he wasn't clean either. The system is broken. Get over it.
SKO-- how dare you champion a supposed 'student athlete' who was charged (by those of a competing school- natch) with indirectly wanting a cash benefit, in a game with the honor and majesty as the "game for all the Tostitos". How. Dare. You.
So is that it? Or are there a few more random bowl games on this week? I can't keep track anymore.
Quote from: Tony on January 11, 2011, 06:03:00 PM
So is that it? Or are there a few more random bowl games on this week? I can't keep track anymore.
Why wasn't the "Fight Hunger" Bowl played in conjunction with the Tostitos Bowl?
Quote from: CBStew on January 11, 2011, 06:36:08 PM
Quote from: Tony on January 11, 2011, 06:03:00 PM
So is that it? Or are there a few more random bowl games on this week? I can't keep track anymore.
Why wasn't the "Fight Hunger" Bowl played in conjunction with the Tostitos Bowl?
Because "This one's for all the hunger" doesn't have the same ring to it.
Quote from: Eli on January 11, 2011, 09:39:00 PM
Quote from: CBStew on January 11, 2011, 06:36:08 PM
Quote from: Tony on January 11, 2011, 06:03:00 PM
So is that it? Or are there a few more random bowl games on this week? I can't keep track anymore.
Why wasn't the "Fight Hunger" Bowl played in conjunction with the Tostitos Bowl?
Because "This one's for all the hunger" doesn't have the same ring to it.
http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2006/06/01/ten-things-wed-like-to-hear-brent-musberger-say/
67-yard PexTonk boner. (http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Video-Carson-Wiggs-hits-a-67-yard-field-goal-in?urn=ncaaf-wp680)
Quote from: PenPho on April 12, 2011, 12:54:04 PM
67-yard PexTonk boner. (http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Video-Carson-Wiggs-hits-a-67-yard-field-goal-in?urn=ncaaf-wp680)
I still have five yards to spare if you measure back to my taint.