Quote from: InternetApex on February 05, 2015, 02:08:38 PMQuote from: PenFoe on February 05, 2015, 01:07:32 PMQuote from: Eli on February 05, 2015, 12:53:25 PMQuote from: BH on February 05, 2015, 12:03:10 PMQuote from: Eli on February 05, 2015, 11:52:58 AMQuote from: Chuck to Chuck on February 05, 2015, 11:42:05 AM
You can't see a team with plenty of cash, low payroll (even with another $20mm per year guy), no more than 18 months away from clearing another $13mm in annual payroll (Jackson), and with a manager who brought the guy up signing Shields?
I still don't think they have "plenty" of cash that they're willing to spend on payroll.
So you don't believe the reports that if Moncada was available after July the Cubs would make a push to sign him? He's going to cost a fortune, and now the Cubs are out on him.
What's your point?
That the Cubs have money for payroll.
Seemed pretty clear.
When he said the price was high on Moncada and the Cubs were out on him, that seemed clear they have money for payroll? I don't know that I follow you or him or Slezak on that.
They are out on Moncada because of a stupid rule the MLB has, not because they don't have the money for him.