Iron Man

[Andre Dawson's Creek]

This is cool.

This guy:


took one of these:


and put together this.


Very cool stuff.

[Weebs]

The trailer for Iron Man 2 is out.  I'll be there on opening night with BatG.

[Quality Start Machine]

The trailer for Iron Man 2 is out.  I'll be there on opening night with BatG.

Hope you get nice weather.

[Kermit IV]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.  It's certainly entertaining.  Downey is predictably good (I actually think Paltrow has really good chemistry with him), Scarlett is hot, Favreau is funny, Rourke is gigantic, and Rockwell is the smug douche he plays in every movie.  It's worth seeing.

[Internet Apex]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.

How good did you think the first one was? I thought it was ok.   

[Kermit IV]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.

How good did you think the first one was? I thought it was ok.   

I felt the same way.  It was a solid, entertaining summer blockbuster with a great actor playing the lead.  I wasn't as blown away as some people were, but I definitely enjoyed it.

[Yeti]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.

How good did you think the first one was? I thought it was ok.   

I felt the same way.  It was a solid, entertaining summer blockbuster with a great actor playing the lead.  I wasn't as blown away as some people were, but I definitely enjoyed it.

I'm with Kerm. It was a nice fun movie. Nothing earth-shattering, but good.

[Internet Apex]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.

How good did you think the first one was? I thought it was ok.   

I felt the same way.  It was a solid, entertaining summer blockbuster with a great actor playing the lead.  I wasn't as blown away as some people were, but I definitely enjoyed it.

I'm with Kerm. It was a nice fun movie. Nothing earth-shattering, but good.

Ok, so, if the second one is basically the same thing only not as good, why don't you get why it's receiving mediocre reviews?

[ChuckD]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.

How good did you think the first one was? I thought it was ok.   

I felt the same way.  It was a solid, entertaining summer blockbuster with a great actor playing the lead.  I wasn't as blown away as some people were, but I definitely enjoyed it.

I'm with Kerm. It was a nice fun movie. Nothing earth-shattering, but good.

Ok, so, if the second one is basically the same thing only not as good, why don't you get why it's receiving mediocre reviews?

YOU JUST GOT COLUMBO'D!

[Kermit IV]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.

How good did you think the first one was? I thought it was ok.   

I felt the same way.  It was a solid, entertaining summer blockbuster with a great actor playing the lead.  I wasn't as blown away as some people were, but I definitely enjoyed it.

I'm with Kerm. It was a nice fun movie. Nothing earth-shattering, but good.

Ok, so, if the second one is basically the same thing only not as good, why don't you get why it's receiving mediocre reviews?

Because the first one got really awesome reviews (93% at RT).  I figured this one was at least good for 85% or higher.  Instead, it's at 75%.  What's hard to understand?

[Internet Apex]

I don't really get why the second one is getting pretty mediocre reviews.  It's pretty much more of the first one, though not quite as good.

How good did you think the first one was? I thought it was ok.   

I felt the same way.  It was a solid, entertaining summer blockbuster with a great actor playing the lead.  I wasn't as blown away as some people were, but I definitely enjoyed it.

I'm with Kerm. It was a nice fun movie. Nothing earth-shattering, but good.

Ok, so, if the second one is basically the same thing only not as good, why don't you get why it's receiving mediocre reviews?

Because the first one got really awesome reviews (93% at RT).  I figured this one was at least good for 85% or higher.  Instead, it's at 75%.  What's hard to understand?

Nothing. I get it now.

[SKO]

I'm really God damn late to the party, but I finally broke the moratorium I had on watching Marvel movies after the double-disasters that were X-Men 3 and Spider Man 3. These films were good. That is all. Also, that Bocaj guy was a douche.

[JD]

I'm really God damn late to the party, but I finally broke the moratorium I had on watching Marvel movies after the double-disasters that were X-Men 3 and Spider Man 3. These films were good. That is all. Also, that Bocaj guy was a douche.

We all miss Bocaj. 

[Slaky]

I'm really God damn late to the party, but I finally broke the moratorium I had on watching Marvel movies after the double-disasters that were X-Men 3 and Spider Man 3. These films were good. That is all. Also, that Bocaj guy was a douche.

We all miss Bocaj. 

But we'll keep throwing our doody until we hit him.

[Tonker]

I'm really God damn late to the party, but I finally broke the moratorium I had on watching Marvel movies after the double-disasters that were X-Men 3 and Spider Man 3. These films were good. That is all. Also, that Bocaj guy was a douche.

We all miss Bocaj. 

But we'll keep throwing our doody until we hit him.

Funniest post in ages.  +1 Desippy.