Bulls are insignificant right now.

[Slaky]

Fuck Garfunkel.

If the Knicks had a second fiddle with anywhere near the scoring-ability of Pippen, they'd have won at least one title. They didn't and they didn't. Sucks to be us.

That isn't the point. Pippen will always be regarded as better than he was. Even as a second banana, he's no James Worthy.

You're not in the dead pool yet?  Stick to writing about hockey so nobody can read your retardedness

Shut the fuck up when grown ups are talking, eighthead.

If grown ups are talking, why are you saying things that a 4 year old would think are idiotic?  We get it, you don't know anything about basketball despite you growing up playing with peach baskets

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

You're ignoring the entire argument - which is simply put, Pippen did EVERYTHING well. Not just scoring. Worthy could score. End scene.

[Internet Apex]

Fuck Garfunkel.

If the Knicks had a second fiddle with anywhere near the scoring-ability of Pippen, they'd have won at least one title. They didn't and they didn't. Sucks to be us.

Patrick Ewing did average over 20 ppg through his career.  Close to 25 through his prime.  He would have been a fine second banana to Pippen.

I bet he wouldn't whine like a sopping-wet cunt if JVG called someone else's number at the end of the game instead of his. But rather got his big ass in position for a rebound/putback similar to the one that vanquished the Pacers in Game 7 of the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals. Pip no doubt scoffed at that play from his seat on the couch back home. Cunt.

[Slaky]

Fuck Garfunkel.

If the Knicks had a second fiddle with anywhere near the scoring-ability of Pippen, they'd have won at least one title. They didn't and they didn't. Sucks to be us.

Patrick Ewing did average over 20 ppg through his career.  Close to 25 through his prime.  He would have been a fine second banana to Pippen.

I bet he wouldn't whine like a sopping-wet cunt if JVG called someone else's number at the end of the game instead of his. But rather got his big ass in position for a rebound/putback similar to the one that vanquished the Pacers in Game 7 of the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals. Pip no doubt scoffed at that play from his seat on the couch back home. Cunt.

I wonder what Ewing was thinking when Pippen graciously introduced his nutsack to Ewing's grill during the dunk of the fucking millennium?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLkzLgZ5wdY

[Quality Start Machine]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

[SKO]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

Ah yes. The platonic ideal big game team argument. Irrefutable.

[Internet Apex]

Fuck Garfunkel.

If the Knicks had a second fiddle with anywhere near the scoring-ability of Pippen, they'd have won at least one title. They didn't and they didn't. Sucks to be us.

Patrick Ewing did average over 20 ppg through his career.  Close to 25 through his prime.  He would have been a fine second banana to Pippen.

I bet he wouldn't whine like a sopping-wet cunt if JVG called someone else's number at the end of the game instead of his. But rather got his big ass in position for a rebound/putback similar to the one that vanquished the Pacers in Game 7 of the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals. Pip no doubt scoffed at that play from his seat on the couch back home. Cunt.

I wonder what Ewing was thinking when Pippen graciously introduced his nutsack to Ewing's grill during the dunk of the fucking millennium?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLkzLgZ5wdY

That was anwesome play. The Knicks won the series though.

[Slaky]

Fuck Garfunkel.

If the Knicks had a second fiddle with anywhere near the scoring-ability of Pippen, they'd have won at least one title. They didn't and they didn't. Sucks to be us.

Patrick Ewing did average over 20 ppg through his career.  Close to 25 through his prime.  He would have been a fine second banana to Pippen.

I bet he wouldn't whine like a sopping-wet cunt if JVG called someone else's number at the end of the game instead of his. But rather got his big ass in position for a rebound/putback similar to the one that vanquished the Pacers in Game 7 of the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals. Pip no doubt scoffed at that play from his seat on the couch back home. Cunt.

I wonder what Ewing was thinking when Pippen graciously introduced his nutsack to Ewing's grill during the dunk of the fucking millennium?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLkzLgZ5wdY

That was anwesome play. The Knicks won the series though.

A small battle in a long war. Man, I miss those games.

[Quality Start Machine]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

Ah yes. The platonic ideal big game team argument. Irrefutable.

This is opinion, son. I'd rather have Worthy. I think he was better. I also think Pippen was lucky as shit to wind up being MJ's wingman, but he'd hardly be the first HOFer in any sport to get in that way.

Shit, I'm sure if I went to Cincinnati and said Tony Perez has no business in the HOF (something else I believe) or went to NY and said the same thing about Don Mattingly (fortunately, for now the BBWAA agrees), I'd get the same pushback.

[Quality Start Machine]

Fuck Garfunkel.

If the Knicks had a second fiddle with anywhere near the scoring-ability of Pippen, they'd have won at least one title. They didn't and they didn't. Sucks to be us.

Patrick Ewing did average over 20 ppg through his career.  Close to 25 through his prime.  He would have been a fine second banana to Pippen.

I bet he wouldn't whine like a sopping-wet cunt if JVG called someone else's number at the end of the game instead of his. But rather got his big ass in position for a rebound/putback similar to the one that vanquished the Pacers in Game 7 of the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals. Pip no doubt scoffed at that play from his seat on the couch back home. Cunt.

I wonder what Ewing was thinking when Pippen graciously introduced his nutsack to Ewing's grill during the dunk of the fucking millennium?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLkzLgZ5wdY

That was anwesome play. The Knicks won the series though.

A small battle in a long war. Man, I miss those games.

Scottie wasn't the biggest pussy in those battles...that was Charles Smith.

[Internet Apex]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

Ah yes. The platonic ideal big game team argument. Irrefutable.

This is opinion, son. I'd rather have Worthy. I think he was better. I also think Pippen was lucky as shit to wind up being MJ's wingman, but he'd hardly be the first HOFer in any sport to get in that way.

Shit, I'm sure if I went to Cincinnati and said Tony Perez has no business in the HOF (something else I believe) or went to NY and said the same thing about Don Mattingly (fortunately, for now the BBWAA agrees), I'd get the same pushback.

I think Pippen and Worthy are comperable and I'd take Worthy based on the fact that he never opened up his fly and urinated on his entire team at the end of a crucial playof game. If you put Pippen on the 80s Lakers, you wouldn't miss a beat though.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

This is opinion, son.

Condescension and fact-free handwaving go together like peanut butter and chocolate.

[Slaky]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

Ah yes. The platonic ideal big game team argument. Irrefutable.

This is opinion, son. I'd rather have Worthy. I think he was better. I also think Pippen was lucky as shit to wind up being MJ's wingman, but he'd hardly be the first HOFer in any sport to get in that way.

Shit, I'm sure if I went to Cincinnati and said Tony Perez has no business in the HOF (something else I believe) or went to NY and said the same thing about Don Mattingly (fortunately, for now the BBWAA agrees), I'd get the same pushback.

I think Pippen and Worthy are comperable and I'd take Worthy based on the fact that he never opened up his fly and urinated on his entire team at the end of a crucial playof game. If you put Pippen on the 80s Lakers, you wouldn't miss a beat though.

That's just preference based on personality which is understandable. I don't think anyone was happy about the 1.8 at the time of the Pout Heard Round the World. Except Toni Kukoc. And he sent 'em home happy anyway.

A legend was born. Good times.

[World's #1 Astros Fan]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

Ah yes. The platonic ideal big game team argument. Irrefutable.

This is opinion, son. I'd rather have Worthy. I think he was better. I also think Pippen was lucky as shit to wind up being MJ's wingman, but he'd hardly be the first HOFer in any sport to get in that way.

Shit, I'm sure if I went to Cincinnati and said Tony Perez has no business in the HOF (something else I believe) or went to NY and said the same thing about Don Mattingly (fortunately, for now the BBWAA agrees), I'd get the same pushback.

I think Pippen and Worthy are comperable and I'd take Worthy based on the fact that he never opened up his fly and urinated on his entire team at the end of a crucial playof game. If you put Pippen on the 80s Lakers, you wouldn't miss a beat though. they, too, may have 3-peated.  At least once.  Or at least beaten Houston in the Conference Finals in '86.  Or beaten Boston in in the Finals in '84.  Or not have gotten swept by the Pistons in 1989--something not even the up-and-coming Bulls had happen to them at the hands of Detroit...though the Bulls with Scottie did sweep Detroit once.

We're talking what happened, though, not what might have happened'd.

[CT III]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

Ah yes. The platonic ideal big game team argument. Irrefutable.

This is opinion, son. I'd rather have Worthy. I think he was better. I also think Pippen was lucky as shit to wind up being MJ's wingman, but he'd hardly be the first HOFer in any sport to get in that way.

Shit, I'm sure if I went to Cincinnati and said Tony Perez has no business in the HOF (something else I believe) or went to NY and said the same thing about Don Mattingly (fortunately, for now the BBWAA agrees), I'd get the same pushback.

I think Pippen and Worthy are comperable and I'd take Worthy based on the fact that he never opened up his fly and urinated on his entire team at the end of a crucial playof game. If you put Pippen on the 80s Lakers, you wouldn't miss a beat though.

That's just preference based on personality which is understandable. I don't think anyone was happy about the 1.8 at the time of the Pout Heard Round the World. Except Toni Kukoc. And he sent 'em home happy anyway.

A legend was born. Good times.

Croatia rules

[R-V]

See if you can fit this into the expanse of your cranium...

Not only did Worthy average a point and a half a game more than Pippen over the course of his career(17.6/16.1), he also had a FG percentage of .521 to Pippen's .473. When you get into playoff numbers, Worthy's PPG is 21.1 to Pippen's 17.5. Which means he actually got a lot better in crunch time.

You can have Pippen, I'd take Worthy.

Yeah, I already mentioned Worthy's slightly-more efficient scoring.  What about Pippen's far superior defense, and his edge in rebounding and distributing the ball?

He was superior defensively. Never said he wasn't. I would rather have Worthy if I needed to win a big game.

Ah yes. The platonic ideal big game team argument. Irrefutable.

This is opinion, son. I'd rather have Worthy. I think he was better. I also think Pippen was lucky as shit to wind up being MJ's wingman, but he'd hardly be the first HOFer in any sport to get in that way.

Shit, I'm sure if I went to Cincinnati and said Tony Perez has no business in the HOF (something else I believe) or went to NY and said the same thing about Don Mattingly (fortunately, for now the BBWAA agrees), I'd get the same pushback.

I think Pippen and Worthy are comperable and I'd take Worthy based on the fact that he never opened up his fly and urinated on his entire team at the end of a crucial playof game. If you put Pippen on the 80s Lakers, you wouldn't miss a beat though. they, too, may have 3-peated.  At least once.  Or at least beaten Houston in the Conference Finals in '86.  Or beaten Boston in in the Finals in '84.  Or not have gotten swept by the Pistons in 1989--something not even the up-and-coming Bulls had happen to them at the hands of Detroit...though the Bulls with Scottie did sweep Detroit once.

We're talking what happened, though, not what might have happened'd.

I don't know - Hosuton had a pretty tough team in '86. JOlauown was a besat.