The Atheist Communist Caliphate Made Flesh, Spread the Clusterfuck Around Thread

[*In a Nutsack]

Why is no body running (or, rather, receiving any votes) on the basis of small, constitutionally-controlled government?

Just throwing it out there -- the Constitution is more than 220 years old and was written when the U.S. population was about 3.5 million people.  Also, our largest industry was agriculture or something.  I'm not sure a rigid, unflinching adherence to the Constitution is the best way to run a government.  I think some flexibility is important.

Sorry if that sounds way out-of-line.

Whether or not you or anyone else thinks it's the best way to run a government... the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  If you think it needs changing, then by all means get it changed.  There's a process for that, and there's a reason they made is difficult to change.  As the old saying goes, this is a nation of laws, not of men.

That is why it can be changed to reflect the times.  If you want to start a federal reserve bank, change the constitution to list this as a responsibility of the federal government.  If you want to enact the New Deal or the "Great" Society legislation, change the constitution so providing jobs and social welfare outside the realm of capitalism is within the realm of the federal government's control.  It is 220 years old, but it is an elastic document.  

As for who the Republicans can run, the party is in dire straights because they have left their roots as the party of small government and become the party of the Christian Right.  Instead of a platform based on fiscal responsibility, they now have a "socially conservative" platform based on legislating morality.  I'm sure will see Romney try again in 2012, but watch for someone new, a la Bobby Jindal.

This.

Does this mean exorcisms will be covered under Medicare?

Why must you Bobby Jindal always resort to douchebaggery believing strongly in hocus-pocus?

Jindal Beezulbub 2012!

God Warrior'd

If we're grabbing at straws, why does Barack Obama hate white people?

[De Jesus]

Why is no body running (or, rather, receiving any votes) on the basis of small, constitutionally-controlled government?

Just throwing it out there -- the Constitution is more than 220 years old and was written when the U.S. population was about 3.5 million people.  Also, our largest industry was agriculture or something.  I'm not sure a rigid, unflinching adherence to the Constitution is the best way to run a government.  I think some flexibility is important.

Sorry if that sounds way out-of-line.

Whether or not you or anyone else thinks it's the best way to run a government... the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  If you think it needs changing, then by all means get it changed.  There's a process for that, and there's a reason they made is difficult to change.  As the old saying goes, this is a nation of laws, not of men.

That is why it can be changed to reflect the times.  If you want to start a federal reserve bank, change the constitution to list this as a responsibility of the federal government.  If you want to enact the New Deal or the "Great" Society legislation, change the constitution so providing jobs and social welfare outside the realm of capitalism is within the realm of the federal government's control.  It is 220 years old, but it is an elastic document.  

As for who the Republicans can run, the party is in dire straights because they have left their roots as the party of small government and become the party of the Christian Right.  Instead of a platform based on fiscal responsibility, they now have a "socially conservative" platform based on legislating morality.  I'm sure will see Romney try again in 2012, but watch for someone new, a la Bobby Jindal.

This.

Does this mean exorcisms will be covered under Medicare?

Why must you Bobby Jindal always resort to douchebaggery believing strongly in hocus-pocus?

Jindal Beezulbub 2012!

God Warrior'd

If we're grabbing at straws, why does Barack Obama hate white people?

When did Obama write an article in the New Oxford Review about hating white folks?

[RV]

Why is no body running (or, rather, receiving any votes) on the basis of small, constitutionally-controlled government?

Just throwing it out there -- the Constitution is more than 220 years old and was written when the U.S. population was about 3.5 million people.  Also, our largest industry was agriculture or something.  I'm not sure a rigid, unflinching adherence to the Constitution is the best way to run a government.  I think some flexibility is important.

Sorry if that sounds way out-of-line.

I liked the suggestion made elsewhere on Desipio of Daniels.

Whoa whoa whoa...you actually READ other posts?

[*In a Nutsack]

Why is no body running (or, rather, receiving any votes) on the basis of small, constitutionally-controlled government?

Just throwing it out there -- the Constitution is more than 220 years old and was written when the U.S. population was about 3.5 million people.  Also, our largest industry was agriculture or something.  I'm not sure a rigid, unflinching adherence to the Constitution is the best way to run a government.  I think some flexibility is important.

Sorry if that sounds way out-of-line.

Whether or not you or anyone else thinks it's the best way to run a government... the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  If you think it needs changing, then by all means get it changed.  There's a process for that, and there's a reason they made is difficult to change.  As the old saying goes, this is a nation of laws, not of men.

That is why it can be changed to reflect the times.  If you want to start a federal reserve bank, change the constitution to list this as a responsibility of the federal government.  If you want to enact the New Deal or the "Great" Society legislation, change the constitution so providing jobs and social welfare outside the realm of capitalism is within the realm of the federal government's control.  It is 220 years old, but it is an elastic document.  

As for who the Republicans can run, the party is in dire straights because they have left their roots as the party of small government and become the party of the Christian Right.  Instead of a platform based on fiscal responsibility, they now have a "socially conservative" platform based on legislating morality.  I'm sure will see Romney try again in 2012, but watch for someone new, a la Bobby Jindal.

This.

Does this mean exorcisms will be covered under Medicare?

Why must you Bobby Jindal always resort to douchebaggery believing strongly in hocus-pocus?

Jindal Beezulbub 2012!

God Warrior'd

If we're grabbing at straws, why does Barack Obama hate white people?

When did Obama write an article in the New Oxford Review about hating white folks?

From Dreams from My Father:

"That hate hadn't gone away"...."white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives."

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names"

"I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race"

But, that's no New Oxford Review.  And, I guess these comments are just fine and dandy.

[Thrillho]

From Dreams from My Father:

"That hate hadn't gone away"...."white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives."

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names"

"I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race"

But, that's no New Oxford Review.  And, I guess these comments are just fine and dandy.

Source?

Oh, yeah. This made-up quote brought to you by Tom Metzger, director of the White Aryan Resistance.

Nice, IAN.

[De Jesus]

Why is no body running (or, rather, receiving any votes) on the basis of small, constitutionally-controlled government?

Just throwing it out there -- the Constitution is more than 220 years old and was written when the U.S. population was about 3.5 million people.  Also, our largest industry was agriculture or something.  I'm not sure a rigid, unflinching adherence to the Constitution is the best way to run a government.  I think some flexibility is important.

Sorry if that sounds way out-of-line.

Whether or not you or anyone else thinks it's the best way to run a government... the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  If you think it needs changing, then by all means get it changed.  There's a process for that, and there's a reason they made is difficult to change.  As the old saying goes, this is a nation of laws, not of men.

That is why it can be changed to reflect the times.  If you want to start a federal reserve bank, change the constitution to list this as a responsibility of the federal government.  If you want to enact the New Deal or the "Great" Society legislation, change the constitution so providing jobs and social welfare outside the realm of capitalism is within the realm of the federal government's control.  It is 220 years old, but it is an elastic document.  

As for who the Republicans can run, the party is in dire straights because they have left their roots as the party of small government and become the party of the Christian Right.  Instead of a platform based on fiscal responsibility, they now have a "socially conservative" platform based on legislating morality.  I'm sure will see Romney try again in 2012, but watch for someone new, a la Bobby Jindal.

This.

Does this mean exorcisms will be covered under Medicare?

Why must you Bobby Jindal always resort to douchebaggery believing strongly in hocus-pocus?

Jindal Beezulbub 2012!

God Warrior'd

If we're grabbing at straws, why does Barack Obama hate white people?

When did Obama write an article in the New Oxford Review about hating white folks?

From Dreams from My Father:

"That hate hadn't gone away"...."white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives."

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names"

"I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race"

But, that's no New Oxford Review.  And, I guess these comments are just fine and dandy.

Holy fucking fail.

[RV]

From Dreams from My Father:

"That hate hadn't gone away"...."white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives."

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names"

"I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race"

But, that's no New Oxford Review.  And, I guess these comments are just fine and dandy.

Source?

Oh, yeah. This made-up quote brought to you by Tom Metzger, director of the White Aryan Resistance.

Nice, IAN.

Hold on a second, Thrill. Are you telling IAN that the information he receives via chain e-mails may not be based on actual facts? Typical librul GOTCHA accusation.

[*In a Nutsack]

From Dreams from My Father:

"That hate hadn't gone away"...."white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives."

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names"

"I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race"

But, that's no New Oxford Review.  And, I guess these comments are just fine and dandy.

Source?

Oh, yeah. This made-up quote brought to you by Tom Metzger, director of the White Aryan Resistance.

Nice, IAN.

Hold on a second, Thrill. Are you telling IAN that the information he receives via chain e-mails may not be based on actual facts? Typical librul GOTCHA accusation.

Tail between my legs, I'll concede that I know they weren't his comments.  However, of course Obama's own site would back up context from his book.

I blame the R & D department.

[morpheus]

Why is no body running (or, rather, receiving any votes) on the basis of small, constitutionally-controlled government?

Just throwing it out there -- the Constitution is more than 220 years old and was written when the U.S. population was about 3.5 million people.  Also, our largest industry was agriculture or something.  I'm not sure a rigid, unflinching adherence to the Constitution is the best way to run a government.  I think some flexibility is important.

Sorry if that sounds way out-of-line.

Whether or not you or anyone else thinks it's the best way to run a government... the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  If you think it needs changing, then by all means get it changed.  There's a process for that, and there's a reason they made is difficult to change.  As the old saying goes, this is a nation of laws, not of men.

That is why it can be changed to reflect the times.  If you want to start a federal reserve bank, change the constitution to list this as a responsibility of the federal government.  If you want to enact the New Deal or the "Great" Society legislation, change the constitution so providing jobs and social welfare outside the realm of capitalism is within the realm of the federal government's control.  It is 220 years old, but it is an elastic document.  

As for who the Republicans can run, the party is in dire straights because they have left their roots as the party of small government and become the party of the Christian Right.  Instead of a platform based on fiscal responsibility, they now have a "socially conservative" platform based on legislating morality.  I'm sure will see Romney try again in 2012, but watch for someone new, a la Bobby Jindal.

This.

Does this mean exorcisms will be covered under Medicare?

Why must you Bobby Jindal always resort to douchebaggery believing strongly in hocus-pocus?

Jindal Beezulbub 2012!

God Warrior'd

If we're grabbing at straws, why does Barack Obama hate white people?

When did Obama write an article in the New Oxford Review about hating white folks?

From Dreams from My Father:

"That hate hadn't gone away"...."white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives."

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names"

"I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race"

But, that's no New Oxford Review.  And, I guess these comments are just fine and dandy.

Holy fucking fail.

On the other hand, we're demonizing a guy because he's religious?  Really?

[De Jesus]

Hold on a second, Thrill. Are you telling IAN that the information he receives via chain e-mails may not be based on actual facts? Typical librul GOTCHA accusation.

Oh, crap!  Now how am I going to add 4+ inches in 30 days?

On the other hand, we're demonizing a guy because he's religious?  Really?

No, we're demonizing a guy because you have to be pretty damned stupid to be one step removed from burning witches.

[5laky]

Level of discourse dropping...dropping.......dropping

[*In a Nutsack]

Level of discourse dropping...dropping.......dropping

On a lighter note, I had never fully read that whole passage.  It's not like he was conducting the exorcism.  At least Susan was okay.

[Philberto]

Hold on a second, Thrill. Are you telling IAN that the information he receives via chain e-mails may not be based on actual facts? Typical librul GOTCHA accusation.

Oh, crap!  Now how am I going to add 4+ inches in 30 days?

On the other hand, we're demonizing a guy because he's religious?  Really?

No, we're demonizing a guy because you have to be pretty damned stupid to be one step removed from burning witches.

I love you

[morpheus]

Now I know why I haven't seen Oleg around the Internets today, besides the obvious "looking too high".

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_win_causes_obsessive?utm_source=embedded_video

[Eli]

Now I know why I haven't seen Oleg around the Internets today, besides the obvious "looking too high".

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_win_causes_obsessive?utm_source=embedded_video

Saw that earlier.  Pretty funny stuff.