Your mind is literally blown

[Tank]

It's mostly that I'm opposed to any law which restricts the Constitution...

And... You lost me.

Huh?

[Canadouche]

It's mostly that I'm opposed to any law which restricts the Constitution...

And... You lost me.

Huh?

...socialism?

[Philberto]

I don't think I've ever realized until today that so many people in this world think that people making personal choices is actually a process of life.

I don't think I'd realized until today how many people on this messageboard were capable of writing sentences that, while technically grammatically correct, don't make a lick of sense.

If it's that hard to understand, maybe my assessment of your intelligence, which I thought was very high, was wrong.  I would suggest actually moving away from the notion of "It's Yeti and I disagree with his radical viewpoint, therefore, none of it can make sense."

Fuck it. If you're going to tell me that the state has the right to tell a business it can't allow smoking (WHICH IS LEGAL) within the confines of the building they OWN, then there is no point in discussing this. It just seems like it'd be a waste of time.

I really didn't want to wade into the middle of this shitstorm but...

I'm going to bet that most restaurants do not in fact own the buildings that they operate out of.

As for smoking being legal, have you ever heard of zoning laws?  Liquor is legal, but you can't sell it without a license.  In Oak Park, only restaurants can sell it.  

I own my house, and recently had some plumbing work done.  You know what I had to do?  Have it inspected by the City to make sure it was done to code.

This argument is bad.  Take another tack.

I speculated that someone may argue this but I figured they'd understand that if a lessor doesn't want it they can prevent the smoking, but the point was that the owner of the building allowed it. I guess that wasn't clear.

Liquor licenses. Those are the same as smoking bans? Smoking bans were done under the premise (or so I'm told) of public health. I would think the whole idea of a liquor license is to have the sale of alcohol go through fewer avenues and the likelihood of foul play (selling to minors) would be cut down a bit. Or it could be used to keep bars out of town, if you're a dry town like Rochester IL (a local town) is.

Your plumbing around your house? Protecting the city's pipelines from people drilling into them and breaking them would fall under the idea of protecting the infrastructure of the city.

[Jon]

It's mostly that I'm opposed to any law which restricts the Constitution...

And... You lost me.

Huh?

...socialism?

I don't get this conversation at all.

[MAD]

I liked this thread better when it was about the benefits of legalizing weed, although it's still better than when it was about some linguistic asshat who had the nerve to rape the English language by disengeniously justifying the use of the word "literally" in a figurative sense.

[ChuckD]

Yeti, (I think) you're making the point that if governments are so eager to protect the public health of residents, they should outright ban the sale of tobacco within their boundaries. I can kind of agree with you on that being the more logical approach.

I liked this thread better when it was about the benefits of legalizing weed, although it's still better than when it was about some linguistic asshat who had the nerve to rape the English language by disengeniously justifying the use of the word "literally" in a figurative sense.

Agreed. I could literally care less about the original topic.

[Jon]

I liked this thread better when it was about the benefits of legalizing weed, although it's still better than when it was about some linguistic asshat who had the nerve to rape the English language by disengeniously justifying the use of the word "literally" in a figurative sense.

HUEY IS ANGRY RIGHT!

[Tank]

I don't think I've ever realized until today that so many people in this world think that people making personal choices is actually a process of life.

I don't think I'd realized until today how many people on this messageboard were capable of writing sentences that, while technically grammatically correct, don't make a lick of sense.

If it's that hard to understand, maybe my assessment of your intelligence, which I thought was very high, was wrong.  I would suggest actually moving away from the notion of "It's Yeti and I disagree with his radical viewpoint, therefore, none of it can make sense."

Okay.

I'll bite.

Please explain what it would mean to "think that people making personal choices is actually a process of life" and who you feel thinks this.

Your plumbing around your house? Protecting the city's pipelines from people drilling into them and breaking them would fall under the idea of protecting the infrastructure of the city.

Municipal sanitation is not about protecting public health?

Well, if that's not a humdinger.

[Tank]

I could literally care less about the original topic.

I see what you just did there, you sly dog.

[Quality Start Machine]

This thread sucks more than JOn at a dick farm.

Someone bring some tits up in this bitch.

[Jon]

This thread is more tired than Fork's jokes.

Someone bring some tits up in this bitch.

[Slaky]

This thread is more tired than Fork's jokes.

Someone bring some tits up in this bitch.

Fork's jokes are as reliable as Jon at a dick farm. Oh, and he's sucking dicks there. At the dick farm.

[Canadouche]

It's mostly that I'm opposed to any law which restricts the Constitution...

And... You lost me.

Huh?

...socialism?

I don't get this conversation at all.

Bewbies?

[ChuckD]

This thread sucks more than JOn at a dick farm.

Someone bring some tits up in this bitch.

Check out these tits.


This chick is smoking.


Here's a nice ass.

[Quality Start Machine]

This thread is more tired than Fork's jokes.

Someone bring some tits up in this bitch.

Fork's jokes are as reliable as Jon at a dick farm. Oh, and he's sucking dicks there. At the dick farm.

In a world of uncertainty, you should kiss my fucking ass for the stability I provide, kid.