News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: LOST Star Trek  ( 37,057 )

Tinker to Evers to Chance

  • F@#$in' New Guy
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,569
  • Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #60 on: September 02, 2010, 11:40:18 PM »
RedLetterMedia (the guy who did the Star Wars prequel reviews) has a new review up about this.

http://www.redlettermedia.com/star_trek_09.html

It's not nearly as funny as the Star Wars reviews, because he actually likes this movie.  I still enjoyed the review.   

What say you, Gil Gunderson?
Validated by Thrillho - Vicinity WG543441 on or about 102345AUG08

I don't get this KurtEvans photoshop at all.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #61 on: September 03, 2010, 06:38:22 AM »
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on September 02, 2010, 11:40:18 PM
RedLetterMedia (the guy who did the Star Wars prequel reviews) has a new review up about this.

http://www.redlettermedia.com/star_trek_09.html

It's not nearly as funny as the Star Wars reviews, because he actually likes this movie.  I still enjoyed the review.   

What say you, Gil Gunderson?

I say it's a fantastic review.

The popcorn eating masses part killed me.

POLEKATZ!!!!
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #62 on: September 03, 2010, 07:22:27 AM »
DPD, but the part about how modern audiences don't know what "sawbones" means saddened me a little bit.

Funny as hell, nevertheless.
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Bort

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,605
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #63 on: September 03, 2010, 08:30:33 AM »
Quote from: Gilgamesh on September 03, 2010, 07:22:27 AM
DPD, but the part about how modern audiences don't know what "sawbones" means saddened me a little bit.

Of course they don't. WE DON'T HAVE THE OED IN PRINT ANYMORE!
"Javier Baez is the stupidest player in Cubs history next to Michael Barrett." Internet Chuck

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #64 on: March 09, 2012, 11:04:03 AM »
Quote from: ChuckD on December 13, 2009, 12:15:09 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on December 13, 2009, 11:56:10 AM
Quote from: R-V on December 13, 2009, 10:24:43 AM
Quote from: Kermit, B. on July 02, 2009, 11:28:37 PM
This movie kicked all kinds of ass.  Best sci-fi movie I've seen since Serenity.

That. What a fun movie.

I know I'm going to regret this more than Weebs' parents regret finishing their basement...but what are the plot holes Chuck was Chucking about?

How about the entire setup with the Supernova for starters?

Go on...

...
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Tinker to Evers to Chance

  • F@#$in' New Guy
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,569
  • Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #65 on: March 09, 2012, 11:25:50 AM »
Why would you pick the supernova setup instead of ripping on the fact that Nero just sat around with his thumb up his ass for 20 years waiting for Spock to show up?
Validated by Thrillho - Vicinity WG543441 on or about 102345AUG08

I don't get this KurtEvans photoshop at all.

JD

  • I feel like 30 million dollars.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,725
  • Location: Bryant, AR
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #66 on: March 12, 2012, 04:35:37 PM »
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on March 09, 2012, 11:25:50 AM
Why would you pick the supernova setup instead of ripping on the fact that Nero just sat around with his thumb up his ass for 20 years waiting for Spock to show up?


I guess his crew was cool with just hanging around, too.  I wonder how many of 'em went ghey.  And, if they did, I wonder how differently LA cops would treat them.  Stew wants to know for some reason.
Can you help me live a little more?  I expect good news.

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #67 on: March 12, 2012, 04:55:37 PM »
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on March 09, 2012, 11:25:50 AM
Why would you pick the supernova setup instead of ripping on the fact that Nero just sat around with his thumb up his ass for 20 years waiting for Spock to show up?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_%28film%29#Filming

QuoteAfter the shoot, Abrams cut out some scenes of Kirk and Spock as children, including seeing the latter as a baby, as well as a subplot involving Nero being imprisoned by the Klingons and his escape: this explanation for his absence during Kirk's life confused many to whom Abrams screened the film.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_%28film%29#Cast

QuoteSome characters had their scenes substantially or entirely cut from the film... Victor Garber plays a Klingon interrogator who tortures Nero during his time on Rura Penthe.

Ah, yes... Good old Rura Penthe. They have borax mines there, right?
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Tinker to Evers to Chance

  • F@#$in' New Guy
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,569
  • Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #68 on: March 12, 2012, 05:00:51 PM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on March 12, 2012, 04:55:37 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on March 09, 2012, 11:25:50 AM
Why would you pick the supernova setup instead of ripping on the fact that Nero just sat around with his thumb up his ass for 20 years waiting for Spock to show up?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_%28film%29#Filming

QuoteAfter the shoot, Abrams cut out some scenes of Kirk and Spock as children, including seeing the latter as a baby, as well as a subplot involving Nero being imprisoned by the Klingons and his escape: this explanation for his absence during Kirk's life confused many to whom Abrams screened the film.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_%28film%29#Cast

QuoteSome characters had their scenes substantially or entirely cut from the film... Victor Garber plays a Klingon interrogator who tortures Nero during his time on Rura Penthe.

Ah, yes... Good old Rura Penthe. They have borax mines there, right?

If Abrams wanted credit for that, he should have put it in the movie.
Validated by Thrillho - Vicinity WG543441 on or about 102345AUG08

I don't get this KurtEvans photoshop at all.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #69 on: March 12, 2012, 05:47:06 PM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on March 12, 2012, 04:55:37 PM
Quote from: Tinker to Evers to Chance on March 09, 2012, 11:25:50 AM
Why would you pick the supernova setup instead of ripping on the fact that Nero just sat around with his thumb up his ass for 20 years waiting for Spock to show up?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_%28film%29#Filming

QuoteAfter the shoot, Abrams cut out some scenes of Kirk and Spock as children, including seeing the latter as a baby, as well as a subplot involving Nero being imprisoned by the Klingons and his escape: this explanation for his absence during Kirk's life confused many to whom Abrams screened the film.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_%28film%29#Cast

QuoteSome characters had their scenes substantially or entirely cut from the film... Victor Garber plays a Klingon interrogator who tortures Nero during his time on Rura Penthe.

Ah, yes... Good old Rura Penthe. They have borax mines there, right?

Borax mines *and* supermodels named Iman.
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #70 on: November 28, 2012, 09:39:35 AM »
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #71 on: December 06, 2012, 08:39:24 AM »

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #72 on: December 18, 2012, 03:34:25 PM »

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #73 on: May 17, 2013, 08:43:15 AM »
OK, that one's done.  It's fine, but it also really aims low. They played it safe and took no chances at all.

Note to TEC: Deep Space Nine gets a nod.

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: LOST Star Trek
« Reply #74 on: May 20, 2013, 11:05:25 AM »
I didn't read this, but you Star Trek people might be interested.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.