Randy Wells Splooge-a-thon

[Jon]

8-4 in 16 starts, 2.73 ERA in 102 1/3 IP and 1.143 WHIP, 65/23 K/BB ratio.  He's only got a 2.0 BB/9.  He hasn't walked more than three in any of his starts; he's only walked three twice.  He's gone 6 innings in 13 of his 16 starts; gone 7 innings in 10 of 16.

Randy Wells, ladies and gentlemen.

Thi

[*In a Nutsack]

8-4 in 16 starts, 2.73 ERA in 102 1/3 IP and 1.143 WHIP, 65/23 K/BB ratio.  He's only got a 2.0 BB/9.  He hasn't walked more than three in any of his starts; he's only walked three twice.  He's gone 6 innings in 13 of his 16 starts; gone 7 innings in 10 of 16.

Randy Wells, ladies and gentlemen.

Thi

He should rightfully have three more wins if the offense would have shown up during those first several starts.

[Oleg]

8-4 in 16 starts, 2.73 ERA in 102 1/3 IP and 1.143 WHIP, 65/23 K/BB ratio.  He's only got a 2.0 BB/9.  He hasn't walked more than three in any of his starts; he's only walked three twice.  He's gone 6 innings in 13 of his 16 starts; gone 7 innings in 10 of 16.

Randy Wells, ladies and gentlemen.

Thi

He should rightfully have three more wins if the offense would have shown up during those first several starts.

Weird how wins shouldn't be a reflection of how a pitcher has pitched, as some around here have been saying for at least 4 years.

[Kermit, B.]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

[*In a Nutsack]

8-4 in 16 starts, 2.73 ERA in 102 1/3 IP and 1.143 WHIP, 65/23 K/BB ratio.  He's only got a 2.0 BB/9.  He hasn't walked more than three in any of his starts; he's only walked three twice.  He's gone 6 innings in 13 of his 16 starts; gone 7 innings in 10 of 16.

Randy Wells, ladies and gentlemen.

Thi

He should rightfully have three more wins if the offense would have shown up during those first several starts.

Weird how wins shouldn't be a reflection of how a pitcher has pitched, as some around here have been saying for at least 4 years.

I know this, Oleg, but the wins do provide a shiney beacon for the dopes who vote on such things as ROY to notice.  Regardless, I think he's in the lead as Kerm mentioned above.

[Internet Apex]

8-4 in 16 starts, 2.73 ERA in 102 1/3 IP and 1.143 WHIP, 65/23 K/BB ratio.  He's only got a 2.0 BB/9.  He hasn't walked more than three in any of his starts; he's only walked three twice.  He's gone 6 innings in 13 of his 16 starts; gone 7 innings in 10 of 16.

Randy Wells, ladies and gentlemen.

Thi

He should rightfully have three more wins if the offense would have shown up during those first several starts.

Weird how wins shouldn't be a reflection of how a pitcher has pitched, as some around here have been saying for at least 4 years.

I know this, Oleg, but the wins do provide a shiney beacon for the dopes who vote on such things as ROY to notice.  Regardless, I think he's in the lead as Kerm mentioned above.

How many first-place votes do you think Jay Kvox would receive? I'd say a handful.

[Weebs]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

[PenFoe]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

Fowler and Happ.

[Ivy6]

8-4 in 16 starts, 2.73 ERA in 102 1/3 IP and 1.143 WHIP, 65/23 K/BB ratio.  He's only got a 2.0 BB/9.  He hasn't walked more than three in any of his starts; he's only walked three twice.  He's gone 6 innings in 13 of his 16 starts; gone 7 innings in 10 of 16.

Randy Wells, ladies and gentlemen.

Thi

He should rightfully have three more wins if the offense would have shown up during those first several starts.

Weird how wins shouldn't be a reflection of how a pitcher has pitched, as some around here have been saying for at least 4 years.

I know this, Oleg, but the wins do provide a shiney beacon for the dopes who vote on such things as ROY to notice.  Regardless, I think he's in the lead as Kerm mentioned above.

Intrepid Reader: Brandon Webb

I agree.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_2003.shtml#NLroy

[Weebs]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

Fowler and Happ.

Fowler has been solid, but I forgot all about Happ.  Wells has the edge right now, but it will be pretty close if they both keep pitching well.

[TDubbs]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

Fowler and Happ.

Fowler has been solid, but I forgot all about Happ.  Wells has the edge right now, but it will be pretty close if they both keep pitching well.

Think so?

[Jon]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

Fowler and Happ.

Fowler has been solid, but I forgot all about Happ.  Wells has the edge right now, but it will be pretty close if they both keep pitching well.

Think so?

Has Weebs ever made a bad prediction before?

[Weebs]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

Fowler and Happ.

Fowler has been solid, but I forgot all about Happ.  Wells has the edge right now, but it will be pretty close if they both keep pitching well.

Think so?

Has Weebs ever made a bad prediction before?

No. And I predict that I never will.

[Gil Gunderson]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

Fowler and Happ.

Fowler has been solid, but I forgot all about Happ.  Wells has the edge right now, but it will be pretty close if they both keep pitching well.

Think so?

Has Weebs ever made a bad prediction before?

No. And I predict that I never will.

Weebs is the Bill Kristol of Desipio.

[Jon]

Who's even close to being in competition with Wells?  Tommy Hanson?  Wells' numbers are better.  Ryan Hanigan?  Absolutely no power, even for a catcher.

I was trying to think of someone last night.  There's really nobody in the NL this year other than Hanson.  But as you pointed out, his numbers are worse, plus he's pitched 40 less innings.  I saw one website that said Sandoval qualified as a rookie, but I think his 154 PA last year doesn't make him eligible.  The only position players I can think of are McCutchen and Rasmus, both the former hasn't been up for too long and the latter has struggled quite a bit after his hot streak.

Fowler and Happ.

Fowler has been solid, but I forgot all about Happ.  Wells has the edge right now, but it will be pretty close if they both keep pitching well.

Think so?

Has Weebs ever made a bad prediction before?

No. And I predict that I never will.

Weebs is the Bill Kristol of Desipio.

Or the Criswell...