Fuck its silent in here.......

[Wheezer]

You guys know this is a CUBS messageboard, right?

Suit yourself:

I do politics in passing

Like a frotteur?

[R-V]

You guys know this is a CUBS messageboard, right?

Once Hendry signs Kiko Calero to complete the 86 win juggernaut, it'll be all Cubs, all the time, hoss.

[Dr. Nguyen Van Falk]

I do politics in passing

Like a frotteur?

There was a quote at the end of the movie "Tears of the Sun." "The only things frotteurism needs to prosper are rough fabrics and crowded public settings."

[JD]

You guys know this is a CUBS messageboard, right?

Once Hendry signs Kiko Calero to complete the 86 win juggernaut, it'll be all Cubs, all the time, hoss.

Ok.

[Brownie]

DPD. A wonky explanation of why the "just pass a simple bill" suggestions are unrealistic.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/no-such-thing-as-simple-health-reform/

Nice explanation of the effects of adding complexity to an already complex health care system that already has too much government involvement. Instead of adding to the complexity (and not creating any value), how about peeling the system back.

For no other good or service that I consume am I so divorced from the true cost. (And this includes government services that are wholly subsidized by taxes.)

We've tried different measures intended to make it easier for people to get coverage, but none of them was able to repeal the natural laws of economics (i.e., we have a finite supply and unlimited demand). What we have done is increase agency cost as administrators working "on behalf of" consumer and provider haggle over price.

Many of those problems were created by the right. Some were created by the left. But most of them came from Washington, DC and various state capitals. Start over.

[thehawk]

DPD. A wonky explanation of why the "just pass a simple bill" suggestions are unrealistic.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/no-such-thing-as-simple-health-reform/

Nice explanation of the effects of adding complexity to an already complex health care system that already has too much government involvement. Instead of adding to the complexity (and not creating any value), how about peeling the system back.

For no other good or service that I consume am I so divorced from the true cost. (And this includes government services that are wholly subsidized by taxes.)

We've tried different measures intended to make it easier for people to get coverage, but none of them was able to repeal the natural laws of economics (i.e., we have a finite supply and unlimited demand). What we have done is increase agency cost as administrators working "on behalf of" consumer and provider haggle over price.

Many of those problems were created by the right. Some were created by the left. But most of them came from Washington, DC and various state capitals. Start over.

Well, if you want real simple, I can do it in 6 words:

All Americans are eligble for Medicare.

[Chuck to Chuck]

DPD. A wonky explanation of why the "just pass a simple bill" suggestions are unrealistic.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/no-such-thing-as-simple-health-reform/

Nice explanation of the effects of adding complexity to an already complex health care system that already has too much government involvement. Instead of adding to the complexity (and not creating any value), how about peeling the system back.

For no other good or service that I consume am I so divorced from the true cost. (And this includes government services that are wholly subsidized by taxes.)

We've tried different measures intended to make it easier for people to get coverage, but none of them was able to repeal the natural laws of economics (i.e., we have a finite supply and unlimited demand). What we have done is increase agency cost as administrators working "on behalf of" consumer and provider haggle over price.

Many of those problems were created by the right. Some were created by the left. But most of them came from Washington, DC and various state capitals. Start over.

Well, if you want real simple, I can do it in 6 words:

All Americans are eligble for Medicare.

Maggie Thatcher would have agreed.

[Gilgamesh]

DPD. A wonky explanation of why the "just pass a simple bill" suggestions are unrealistic.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/no-such-thing-as-simple-health-reform/

Nice explanation of the effects of adding complexity to an already complex health care system that already has too much government involvement. Instead of adding to the complexity (and not creating any value), how about peeling the system back.

For no other good or service that I consume am I so divorced from the true cost. (And this includes government services that are wholly subsidized by taxes.)

We've tried different measures intended to make it easier for people to get coverage, but none of them was able to repeal the natural laws of economics (i.e., we have a finite supply and unlimited demand). What we have done is increase agency cost as administrators working "on behalf of" consumer and provider haggle over price.

Many of those problems were created by the right. Some were created by the left. But most of them came from Washington, DC and various state capitals. Start over.

Well, if you want real simple, I can do it in 6 words:

All Americans are eligble for Medicare.

I agree.  And the legislation would be simple: delete the words "65 and older" from the Medicare statute.

Probably a two-page bill.  Republicans can get behind that.

[ChuckD]

http://handjobexchange.com/sbox/markov/mikec.php

[Slaky]

http://handjobexchange.com/sbox/markov/mikec.php

How did you--what in the--

[Dr. Nguyen Van Falk]

http://handjobexchange.com/sbox/markov/mikec.php

How did you--what in the--

Computers.

[waves hand mysteriously]

[ChuckD]

http://handjobexchange.com/sbox/markov/mikec.php

How did you--what in the--

I think you're question should be "Why."

...Because the world can ever half enough MikeC posts.

[Dr. Nguyen Van Falk]

http://handjobexchange.com/sbox/markov/mikec.php

How did you--what in the--

I think you're question should be "Why."

...Because the world can ever half enough MikeC posts.

It's unfair and so happens and everything he never blamed him rack up on Mr. President, its been going on the coffers to make with millions of them were just give a leap of crap and stop this should not afford. Republicans have a court order. If allowed to win. On the right the difference. That's fine for every single word that was doing it was Police Captain. Not to defeat America' playbook step in clean sums? One quote you should be happening in the flood gates to be fun bringing up the people to be on 1 mosque, and and Obama was the pants if those bullshit because in power.

Obama was the pants. But not anymore.

Not anymore.

[Tinker to Evers to Chance]

http://handjobexchange.com/sbox/markov/mikec.php

How did you--what in the--

I think you're question should be "Why."

...Because the world can ever half enough MikeC posts.

I see what you did there.

[Slaky]

http://handjobexchange.com/sbox/markov/mikec.php

How did you--what in the--

I think you're question should be "Why."

...Because the world can ever half enough MikeC posts.

I see what you did there.

Looks like you only saw have of it.