Fuck its silent in here.......

[MikeC]

I think we can all agree, threats of violence and acts of violence are unacceptable. But why are some of you getting outraged now? You thought it was cool and funny when it was done to Bush and the Republicans for 8 years. Its not funny anymore when your on the receiving end huh? I wish there was some civil discourse but that was thrown out the window in the last 8 years by the way you Democrats acted and treated people. Hell you still treat people like shit, calling them racists and teabaggers because they disagree with you. Atleast when we called out groups like Code Pink as socialist communists we were right because they actually joined forces with groups like A.N.S.W.E.R who culled its leadership from the Workers World Party, and are members of the Party for Socialism and Liberation.

But my point of posting today is for Chuck to Chuck and addressing his 1.2 trillion in savings in the next 20 years....

President Obama's fiscal 2011 budget will generate nearly $10 trillion in cumulative budget deficits over the next 10 years, $1.2 trillion more than the administration projected, and raise the federal debt to 90 percent of the nation's economic output by 2020, the Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday.

The federal public debt, which was $6.3 trillion ($56,000 per household) when Mr. Obama entered office amid an economic crisis, totals $8.2 trillion ($72,000 per household) today, and it's headed toward $20.3 trillion (more than $170,000 per household) in 2020, according to CBO's deficit estimates.

Where are we saving money again? Thats on top if you truly believe were going to save any money on Health Care. It hasn't happened anywhere else health care has been put in place. Not even in Cuba where ObamaCare got a glowing endorsement from Fidel Castro.

Anyone see a problem with this administrations policies? Massive crushing debt? We were supposed to pull back from the Bush years, not step on the gas and fly over the cliff....



People are mad because this isn't what they voted for, and they are going to do their best to change that by voting the idiots who like these policies out of office.

I am more in the camp of throwing them all out and starting from scratch, vote out every single Republican and Democrat. Because if the Republicans get back in power, the gloves are off and they might go after their wet dream. But 20 trillion by 2020? Something has to get cut, Democrats will want the military, Republicans will want social security or federal school funding cut. If your a Democrat and can't stand the amount of funding the military gets whats your best course of action to finally cut that spending? Run up the deficit so much that you paint the Republicans into a corner and make them cut money to social programs that people now depend on. The only logical, least politically damaging route, is cutting military spending. Its a nice way to finally gut our military and make it more like Europe's, which is virtually non-existent. Their only saving grace is the power our military projects over Europe. But if America is in retreat, like it looks like now with throwing Israel under the bus and softening sanctions on Iran, two countries who are going in the opposite direction with military spending will advance. Russia and China are in the midst of total overhauls of their armed forces. Russia is already probing Eastern Europe, as we saw with the Georgia Invasion.

These policies have consequences and ramifications for decades beyond. Most of you just look at it and go weee Free Health Care! Who pays for it? Fuck it who cares its free!

Spending has to get under control, and its pretty clear you Democrats are in no position to make that possible. Its going to be left to the Republicans to slash programs, and for that they will be cast as the devil. Damned if you do and damned if you don't, but living in a blissful fantasy world where you keep adding and adding and never taking away isn't sustainable. The Republicans are going to need strong leaders if they want to cut the budget, they won't be able to do crap with RINO's who like to spend. Its a good first step that the entire party voted against Health Care, now they need to win seats and start hacking this bill apart, stopping stimulus money, and cutting crap out of the budget. You can raise taxes, keep taxes the same i don't know, but do some real paying down off the debt, not budget gimmicks where you spend trillions and make believe your actually saving money. Because if your going to add 10 trillion in debt but claim your going to save 1.2 trillion, your still 8.8 trillion in the hole, you haven't saved the country a dime.

[Dr. Nguyen Van Falk]

You thought it was cool and funny when it was done to Bush and the Republicans for 8 years.

{{citation needed}}

[Slaky]

You thought it was cool and funny when it was done to Bush and the Republicans for 8 years.

{{citation needed}}

Like when Cheney shot a (I can assume) Republican in the face? That was pretty funny. I laughed.

[Wheezer]

I wish there was some civil discourse but that was thrown out the window in the last 8 years by the way you Democrats acted and treated people. Hell you still treat people like shit, calling them racists and teabaggers because they disagree with you.

How do you type with Ayn Rand's balls in your mouth?

[Chuck to Chuck]

But my point of posting today is for Chuck to Chuck and addressing his 1.2 trillion in savings in the next 20 years....

A) I'm stunned you think you have a point.

B) I guess the CBO stands for Chuck's Budget Office.

C)

[Eli]

I wish there was some civil discourse but that was thrown out the window in the last 8 years by the way you Democrats acted and treated people. Hell you still treat people like shit, calling them racists and teabaggers because they disagree with you.

How do you type with Ayn Rand's balls in your mouth?

Hehe.

[Dr. Nguyen Van Falk]

I wish there was some civil discourse but that was thrown out the window in the last 8 years by the way you Democrats acted and treated people. Hell you still treat people like shit, calling them racists and teabaggers because they disagree with you.

How do you type with Ayn Rand's balls in your mouth?

Hehe.

Who does MikeC think he is? Alan Greenspan?

[Gilgamesh]

To be fair to MikeC, this is mostly the afterbirth from Drudge this time.  Malkin can get a pass today, boys.

Also, discretionary spending in the federal budget: 1.37 trillion, of which nearly 700 billion plus is going to the military.

Mandatory spending is the rest.  Where would you like to cut?  The military?  Seems pretty obvious.

Sorry TEC.

[Chuck to Chuck]

To be fair to MikeC, this is mostly the afterbirth from Drudge this time.  Malkin can get a pass today, boys.

Also, discretionary spending in the federal budget: 1.37 trillion, of which nearly 700 billion plus is going to the military.

Mandatory spending is the rest.  Where would you like to cut?  The military?  Seems pretty obvious.

Sorry TEC.

How about some "entitlements"?  That seems pretty more obvious.

[Quality Start Machine]

To be fair to MikeC, this is mostly the afterbirth from Drudge this time.  Malkin can get a pass today, boys.

Also, discretionary spending in the federal budget: 1.37 trillion, of which nearly 700 billion plus is going to the military.

Mandatory spending is the rest.  Where would you like to cut?  The military?  Seems pretty obvious.

Sorry TEC.

Leave it to the TAXOLIB HOMOCRATS to cut funding to the people who can blow their shit way up.

[R-V]

Because if the Republicans get back in power, the gloves are off and they might go after their wet dream.

What's the Republican wet dream?

[Gilgamesh]

To be fair to MikeC, this is mostly the afterbirth from Drudge this time.  Malkin can get a pass today, boys.

Also, discretionary spending in the federal budget: 1.37 trillion, of which nearly 700 billion plus is going to the military.

Mandatory spending is the rest.  Where would you like to cut?  The military?  Seems pretty obvious.

Sorry TEC.

How about some "entitlements"?  That seems pretty more obvious.

Obvious =/= politically feasible.

[Bort]

Because if the Republicans get back in power, the gloves are off and they might go after their wet dream.

What's the Republican wet dream?

I can only assume it involves only the finest imported imitation crabmeat.

[Chuck to Chuck]

How about some "entitlements"?  That seems pretty more obvious.

Obvious =/= politically feasible.

He who goes after entitlements is he who is honest and a leader and serving the public interest.  Anyone else is just protecting their job.

[Gilgamesh]

How about some "entitlements"?  That seems pretty more obvious.

Obvious =/= politically feasible.

He who goes after entitlements is he who is honest and a leader and serving the public interest.  Anyone else is just protecting their job.

What alternate reality, Bizzaro-land, America do you live in?  They are all protecting their jobs.

Can you foresee another Reagan/Tip O'Neill confab on Social Security happening again?