Fuck its silent in here.......

[J. Walter Weatherman]

THIS (and I would link to the WSJ article, but I can't remember how to circumvent the subscriber only content there. I thought there was a way.)

http://google.com/url?q=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704518904575365450087744876.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion

[Yeti]

THIS (and I would link to the WSJ article, but I can't remember how to circumvent the subscriber only content there. I thought there was a way.)

http://google.com/url?q=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704518904575365450087744876.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion

Thanks, Internet Master

[Wheezer]

Well, I'm pretty sure this is no coincidence.

[MikeC]

JournoList is like a gift that keeps on giving....

http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/22/when-mccain-picked-palin-liberal-journalists-coordinated-the-best-line-of-attack/

Ohhh it's just harmless E-mails between journalists, they aren't co-ordinating how to shape news cycles to best help Democrats at all.

"Okay, let's get deadly serious, folks.  Grating voice or not, 'inexperienced' or not, Sarah Palin's just been introduced to the country as a brave, above-party, oil-company-bashing, pork-hating maverick 'outsider'," Kilgore said, "What we can do is to expose her ideology.

[/b]

And thats exactly what they did. They covered up for Wright, they used baseless Racist claims, and now a co-ordinated effort to discredit a political candidate. If your the managing editor of a newspaper and your journalists were involved in Journolist they should be fired on the spot for using the power of the paper to shape a political agenda, and if the managing editor is involved, then the owners of the newspaper need to clean house. You kinda see why print media is dying, its because of efforts by people in Journolist that have destroyed consumer confidence in their own industry.

We haven't even seen the tip of the iceberg in these Journolist leaks, its gonna be a long slow leak to the elections. Just to keep everyone reminded that journalists as a whole can't be trusted and they do a shit load of covering for Democrats.

[Bort]

JournoList is like a gift that keeps on giving....

Praise from Caesar.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

What, Mike... nothing on the latest Breitbart joint to drop?

You know, the one that proves that the NAACP are the real racists?

[CBStew]

What, Mike... nothing on the latest Breitbart joint to drop?

You know, the one that proves that the NAACP are the real racists?

Now your just being mean.

[MikeC]

What, Mike... nothing on the latest Breitbart joint to drop?

You know, the one that proves that the NAACP are the real racists?

Well the obvious silence about Journolist members conspiring to call people racists to deflect attention away from their favored candidates is pretty telling around here. When something you know is wrong, but can't bring yourself to say is wrong, it becomes non-news to you guys. Just like Journolist members wanting to change the subject.

[Quality Start Machine]

What, Mike... nothing on the latest Breitbart joint to drop?

You know, the one that proves that the NAACP are the real racists?

Well the obvious silence about Journolist members conspiring to call people racists to deflect attention away from their favored candidates is pretty telling around here. When something you know is wrong, but can't bring yourself to say is wrong, it becomes non-news to you guys. Just like Journolist members wanting to change the subject.

So people talking on a message board means they're actually devising a strategy?

Shit, guys...we're doing this all wrong.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

What, Mike... nothing on the latest Breitbart joint to drop?

You know, the one that proves that the NAACP are the real racists?

Well the obvious silence about Journolist members conspiring to call people racists to deflect attention away from their favored candidates is pretty telling around here. When something you know is wrong, but can't bring yourself to say is wrong, it becomes non-news to you guys. Just like Journolist members wanting to change the subject.

So people talking on a message board over email means they're actually devising a strategy?

Shit, guys...we're doing this all wrong.

HOW SINISTER'd

[Quality Start Machine]

What, Mike... nothing on the latest Breitbart joint to drop?

You know, the one that proves that the NAACP are the real racists?

Well the obvious silence about Journolist members conspiring to call people racists to deflect attention away from their favored candidates is pretty telling around here. When something you know is wrong, but can't bring yourself to say is wrong, it becomes non-news to you guys. Just like Journolist members wanting to change the subject.

So people talking on a message board over email means they're actually devising a strategy?

Shit, guys...we're doing this all wrong.

HOW SINISTER'd

I thought is was in an online forum. So maybe you guys are doing it right, and I'm doing it wrong. Shit.

*walks away hanging head while Charlie Brown music plays*

[Brownie]

Cross-posted in the "2010-2011 Bears: The Last Time You'll See Utler Alive" thread:

Glenn Beck an Urlacher fan, then? Or not?

Bizarre.

[CBStew]

I have always assumed that if Glen Beck called someone a Neo-Nazi it was intended as a compliment. 

[Brownie]

I have always assumed that if Glen Beck called someone a Neo-Nazi it was intended as a compliment. 

That's not a farfetched assumption.

[Chuck to Chuck]

I have always assumed that if Glen Beck called someone a Neo-Nazi it was intended as a compliment. 

That's not a farfetched assumption.

I just heard the tape on the radio.  He said, "I don't know these people at all.  That one's Madona.  I think that one (Urlacher) is a neo-Nazi."

Does he really think he's being cute by being flippant about people he admits he doesn't know who they are even by sight?  What does this say about the people who listen to him?  About the network that gives him airtime?