Fuck its silent in here.......

[CBStew]

Not if Michelle has anything to say about it.

[Quality Start Machine]

Not if Michelle has anything to say about it.

Also: is Dr. Obama's Root Injection "what's next in Healthcare"?

[J. Walter Weatherman]

OH MAN I WONDER WHY NONE OF YOU GUYS ARE TALKING ABOUT THIS LATEST PROOF THAT OBAMA IS A SECRET NEW BLACK PANTHER. JUST MORE CORRUPTION FROM ERIC HOLDER AND THE REST OF THE DEM'S AND MORE OBVIOUS SILENCE FROM THE LIBERAL MEDIA. WHAT A SURPRISE. OHHH RIGHT I FORGOT ONLY CONSERVATIVES ARE THE RACISTS. FUNNY HOW THAT WORKS. BUT GO AHEAD AND STICK YOUR HEAD'S IN THE SAND BECAUSE THE REAL FACTS WILL CONTINUE TO DESTROY YOU'RE REALITY WHEN MORE AND MORE VIDEOS DROP.



WHO'S PLAYING THE RACE CARD NOW DEM'S?

[Gilgamesh]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

[Slaky]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

[Quality Start Machine]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot. That's not hypocrisy at all.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot the deliberate, premeditated extra-legal targeting of a US citizen for death. That's not hypocrisy at all.

I doubt they even bothered to sprinkle some crack on him afterward.

[morpheus]

I got nothin'.

[Gilgamesh]

It's a good thing we have these new voter ID laws in parts of the country now.  We wouldn't want elderly citizens who have been voting since the fifties and who possess multiple forms of ID to be denied: http://www.tennessean.com/article/20111006/NEWS21/310060034/Chattanooga-woman-96-denied-voter-ID

[Quality Start Machine]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot the deliberate, premeditated extra-legal targeting of a US citizen for death. That's not hypocrisy at all.

I doubt they even bothered to sprinkle some crack on him afterward.

Speaking in police terms, nobody doubts there was probable cause. It's the same thing as sending in a SWAT team.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot the deliberate, premeditated extra-legal targeting of a US citizen for death. That's not hypocrisy at all.

I doubt they even bothered to sprinkle some crack on him afterward.

Speaking in police terms, nobody doubts there was probable cause. It's the same thing as sending in a SWAT team.

I don't think probable cause works like that, counselor.

[Gilgamesh]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot the deliberate, premeditated extra-legal targeting of a US citizen for death. That's not hypocrisy at all.

I doubt they even bothered to sprinkle some crack on him afterward.

Speaking in police terms, nobody doubts there was probable cause. It's the same thing as sending in a SWAT team.

Yeah, except it's not.  At all.

[Quality Start Machine]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot the deliberate, premeditated extra-legal targeting of a US citizen for death. That's not hypocrisy at all.

I doubt they even bothered to sprinkle some crack on him afterward.

Speaking in police terms, nobody doubts there was probable cause. It's the same thing as sending in a SWAT team.

I don't think probable cause works like that, counselor.

I'm as much of a lawyer as Gil is, but if a government agency (whether it be the cops, army, black ops, ISIS, whatever) determines someone to be a large enough threat, they can give a "shoot to kill" order. All the legal ramifications factor into that decision. Especially when you're a President that is 13 months from an election.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot the deliberate, premeditated extra-legal targeting of a US citizen for death. That's not hypocrisy at all.

I doubt they even bothered to sprinkle some crack on him afterward.

Speaking in police terms, nobody doubts there was probable cause. It's the same thing as sending in a SWAT team.

I don't think probable cause works like that, counselor.

I'm as much of a lawyer as Gil is, but if a government agency (whether it be the cops, army, black ops, ISIS, whatever) determines someone to be a large enough threat, they can give a "shoot to kill" order. All the legal ramifications factor into that decision. Especially when you're a President that is 13 months from an election.

I'm pretty sure that that's the very policy that's under scrutiny here, Fork.

I recall once reading something somewhere to the effect of "No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Not sure of the source, though.

[Gilgamesh]

This is terrifying: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-cia-killlisttre79475c-20111005,0,5971732.story#start

Death panels!

They accuse Obama of hypocrisy, noting his administration insisted on publishing Bush-era administration legal memos justifying the use of interrogation techniques many equate with torture, but refused to make public its rationale for killing a citizen without due process

We don't want cops tuning up perps in custody, but there's nothing wrong with a righteous shoot the deliberate, premeditated extra-legal targeting of a US citizen for death. That's not hypocrisy at all.

I doubt they even bothered to sprinkle some crack on him afterward.

Speaking in police terms, nobody doubts there was probable cause. It's the same thing as sending in a SWAT team.

I don't think probable cause works like that, counselor.

I'm as much of a lawyer as Gil is, but if a government agency (whether it be the cops, army, black ops, ISIS, whatever) determines someone to be a large enough threat, they can give a "shoot to kill" order. All the legal ramifications factor into that decision. Especially when you're a President that is 13 months from an election.

Obviously someone didn't get the memo.