News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: Fine Liquor  ( 89,083 )

CT III

  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,828
  • Location: NonDescript
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #225 on: December 10, 2012, 10:03:24 PM »
While I enjoy a nice scotch as much as the next SKO, I'm also partial to sweet beverages. 

Anyway, grabbed some of this at Binny's the other day:



Basically, if you like horchata and you like rum, you should get this. 

If you use Bailey's for anything, use this instead. 

Holy shit it's good.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #226 on: December 11, 2012, 05:14:47 AM »
Quote from: CT III on December 10, 2012, 10:03:24 PM
While I enjoy a nice scotch as much as the next SKO, I'm also partial to sweet beverages. 

Anyway, grabbed some of this at Binny's the other day:



Basically, if you like horchata and you like rum, you should get this. 

If you use Bailey's for anything, use this instead. 

Holy shit it's good.

Cool.

What does your husband drink?
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

CT III

  • Administrator
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,828
  • Location: NonDescript
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #227 on: December 11, 2012, 06:22:11 AM »
Quote from: PANK! on December 11, 2012, 05:14:47 AM
Quote from: CT III on December 10, 2012, 10:03:24 PM
While I enjoy a nice scotch as much as the next SKO, I'm also partial to sweet beverages. 

Anyway, grabbed some of this at Binny's the other day:



Basically, if you like horchata and you like rum, you should get this. 

If you use Bailey's for anything, use this instead. 

Holy shit it's good.

Cool.

What does your husband drink?

Well, he's Irish so...probably semen.

PenPho

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,846
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #228 on: December 11, 2012, 10:21:38 AM »
Quote from: CT III on December 11, 2012, 06:22:11 AM
Quote from: PANK! on December 11, 2012, 05:14:47 AM
Quote from: CT III on December 10, 2012, 10:03:24 PM
While I enjoy a nice scotch as much as the next SKO, I'm also partial to sweet beverages. 

Anyway, grabbed some of this at Binny's the other day:



Basically, if you like horchata and you like rum, you should get this. 

If you use Bailey's for anything, use this instead. 

Holy shit it's good.

Cool.

What does your husband drink?

Well, he's Irish so...probably semen.

And THAT is how it's done.
"I use exit numbers because they tell me how many miles are left since they're based off of the molested"

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #229 on: February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM »
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right? 

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #230 on: February 14, 2013, 11:17:17 AM »
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right? 

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?


BOO.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #231 on: February 14, 2013, 11:58:59 AM »
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right? 

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?

Meh. Do you really think the TDubbses of the world will notice a drop from 90 to 84 proof? It'll still be a step up from Jack and Beam at 80.
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #232 on: February 14, 2013, 12:14:49 PM »
Also: note that Jack itself (now 80 proof) was bottled at 90 proof until 1987.
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #233 on: February 14, 2013, 02:23:41 PM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on February 14, 2013, 12:14:49 PM
Also: note that Jack itself (now 80 proof) was bottled at 90 proof until 1987.

this dick won't jack itself

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #234 on: February 14, 2013, 03:08:06 PM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on February 14, 2013, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right? 

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?

Meh. Do you really think the TDubbses of the world will notice a drop from 90 to 84 proof? It'll still be a step up from Jack and Beam at 80.

I'm less worried about the drop in proof than any noticeable change in flavor. I mean, I know that diluting the product at the distillery is different than just adding water to it at a bar or whatever, but, it's Maker's Mark.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #235 on: February 14, 2013, 03:28:31 PM »
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:08:06 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on February 14, 2013, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right? 

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?

Meh. Do you really think the TDubbses of the world will notice a drop from 90 to 84 proof? It'll still be a step up from Jack and Beam at 80.

I'm less worried about the drop in proof than any noticeable change in flavor. I mean, I know that diluting the product at the distillery is different than just adding water to it at a bar or whatever, but, it's Maker's Mark.

I'm thinking this guy would have rather spend $1 more per bottle than having his drink messed with.

And he's on record as being the cheapest guy on this message board.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #236 on: February 14, 2013, 03:46:21 PM »
Quote from: PenFoe on February 14, 2013, 03:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:08:06 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on February 14, 2013, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right?  

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?

Meh. Do you really think the TDubbses of the world will notice a drop from 90 to 84 proof? It'll still be a step up from Jack and Beam at 80.

I'm less worried about the drop in proof than any noticeable change in flavor. I mean, I know that diluting the product at the distillery is different than just adding water to it at a bar or whatever, but, it's Maker's Mark.

I'm thinking this guy would have rather spend $1 more per bottle than having his drink messed with.

And he's on record as being the cheapest guy on this message board.

Well, hell, if I've already decided to hitch on the fancy pants (with belt) and get something fancier than a $15 bottle of Jim Beam, I'm fine with paying an extra couple of bucks for Maker's Mark. Oh well. As far as top shelf bourbon goes there's always Woodford, 1792, Knobb, or this local stuff that is absolutely fantastic. Your loss, Maker's Mark. Someone else will bring out my inner Cyndi Lauper.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

flannj

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,369
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #237 on: February 14, 2013, 03:52:11 PM »
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:46:21 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 14, 2013, 03:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:08:06 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on February 14, 2013, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right?  

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?

Meh. Do you really think the TDubbses of the world will notice a drop from 90 to 84 proof? It'll still be a step up from Jack and Beam at 80.

I'm less worried about the drop in proof than any noticeable change in flavor. I mean, I know that diluting the product at the distillery is different than just adding water to it at a bar or whatever, but, it's Maker's Mark.

I'm thinking this guy would have rather spend $1 more per bottle than having his drink messed with.

And he's on record as being the cheapest guy on this message board.

Well, hell, if I've already decided to hitch on the fancy pants (with belt) and get something fancier than a $15 bottle of Jim Beam, I'm fine with paying an extra couple of bucks for Maker's Mark. Oh well. As far as top shelf bourbon goes there's always Woodford, 1792, Knobb, or this local stuff that is absolutely fantastic. Your loss, Maker's Mark. Someone else will bring out my inner Cyndi Lauper.

Bourbon makes you masturbate?
"Not throwing my hands up or my dress above my ears don't mean I ain't awestruck." -- Al Swearengen

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #238 on: February 14, 2013, 03:54:11 PM »
Quote from: flannj on February 14, 2013, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:46:21 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 14, 2013, 03:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:08:06 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on February 14, 2013, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right?  

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?

Meh. Do you really think the TDubbses of the world will notice a drop from 90 to 84 proof? It'll still be a step up from Jack and Beam at 80.

I'm less worried about the drop in proof than any noticeable change in flavor. I mean, I know that diluting the product at the distillery is different than just adding water to it at a bar or whatever, but, it's Maker's Mark.

I'm thinking this guy would have rather spend $1 more per bottle than having his drink messed with.

And he's on record as being the cheapest guy on this message board.

Well, hell, if I've already decided to hitch on the fancy pants (with belt) and get something fancier than a $15 bottle of Jim Beam, I'm fine with paying an extra couple of bucks for Maker's Mark. Oh well. As far as top shelf bourbon goes there's always Woodford, 1792, Knobb, or this local stuff that is absolutely fantastic. Your loss, Maker's Mark. Someone else will bring out my inner Cyndi Lauper.

Bourbon makes you masturbate?

Oxygen makes him masturbate.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: Fine Liquor
« Reply #239 on: February 14, 2013, 04:00:23 PM »
Quote from: Fork on February 14, 2013, 03:54:11 PM
Quote from: flannj on February 14, 2013, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:46:21 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 14, 2013, 03:28:31 PM
Quote from: SKO on February 14, 2013, 03:08:06 PM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on February 14, 2013, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on February 13, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
I don't know if this is a big deal, but Maker's Mark to Dilute Bourbon by 7 Percent

Clearly this isn't the best way to save a buck, right?  

Wouldn't raising prices versus (quite literally) diluting the product and brand be a better option?

Meh. Do you really think the TDubbses of the world will notice a drop from 90 to 84 proof? It'll still be a step up from Jack and Beam at 80.

I'm less worried about the drop in proof than any noticeable change in flavor. I mean, I know that diluting the product at the distillery is different than just adding water to it at a bar or whatever, but, it's Maker's Mark.

I'm thinking this guy would have rather spend $1 more per bottle than having his drink messed with.

And he's on record as being the cheapest guy on this message board.

Well, hell, if I've already decided to hitch on the fancy pants (with belt) and get something fancier than a $15 bottle of Jim Beam, I'm fine with paying an extra couple of bucks for Maker's Mark. Oh well. As far as top shelf bourbon goes there's always Woodford, 1792, Knobb, or this local stuff that is absolutely fantastic. Your loss, Maker's Mark. Someone else will bring out my inner Cyndi Lauper.

Bourbon makes you masturbate?

Oxygen makes him masturbate.

Well, this took a bit of a digression, didn't it?
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015