News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: 2012 NFL General Thread  ( 13,216 )

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #45 on: March 22, 2012, 02:28:15 PM »
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 01:45:48 PM
Didn't Forte complain last year that the Bears were overusing him? And now he's upset about the signing of a capable backup that can lighten his workload?

WHICH IS IT, MATT?

I don't recall him complaining about that.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Richard Chuggar

  • TJG is back!
  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,493
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #46 on: March 22, 2012, 02:30:16 PM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 22, 2012, 02:28:15 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 01:45:48 PM
Didn't Forte complain last year that the Bears were overusing him? And now he's upset about the signing of a capable backup that can lighten his workload?

WHICH IS IT, MATT?

I don't recall him complaining about that.

http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/7722093/2012-nfl-free-agency-chicago-bears-sign-michael-bush-matt-forte-unhappy
Because when you're fighting for your man, experience is a mutha'.

PenPho

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,846
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #47 on: March 22, 2012, 02:34:10 PM »
Quote from: Richard Chuggar on March 22, 2012, 02:30:16 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 22, 2012, 02:28:15 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 01:45:48 PM
Didn't Forte complain last year that the Bears were overusing him? And now he's upset about the signing of a capable backup that can lighten his workload?

WHICH IS IT, MATT?

I don't recall him complaining about that.

http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/7722093/2012-nfl-free-agency-chicago-bears-sign-michael-bush-matt-forte-unhappy

I don't see how that link addresses Apex's comment.
"I use exit numbers because they tell me how many miles are left since they're based off of the molested"

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #48 on: March 22, 2012, 02:37:51 PM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 22, 2012, 02:28:15 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 01:45:48 PM
Didn't Forte complain last year that the Bears were overusing him? And now he's upset about the signing of a capable backup that can lighten his workload?

WHICH IS IT, MATT?

I don't recall him complaining about that.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/02/matt-forte-thinks-bears-are-grinding-me-into-a-pulp/

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #49 on: March 22, 2012, 02:42:01 PM »
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 02:37:51 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 22, 2012, 02:28:15 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 01:45:48 PM
Didn't Forte complain last year that the Bears were overusing him? And now he's upset about the signing of a capable backup that can lighten his workload?

WHICH IS IT, MATT?

I don't recall him complaining about that.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/02/matt-forte-thinks-bears-are-grinding-me-into-a-pulp/

Interesting. I never saw that. He's kind of acting the turd, given that he's got $7 Mil invested in him. But I guess I understand the idea of trying to get all you can while you can. What I don't like is the Tweet from Greg Olsen at the end of Dubbs' link. Fuck that guy and whatever he thinks.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

BH

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,344
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #50 on: March 22, 2012, 02:46:32 PM »
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 02:37:51 PM
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 22, 2012, 02:28:15 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 22, 2012, 01:45:48 PM
Didn't Forte complain last year that the Bears were overusing him? And now he's upset about the signing of a capable backup that can lighten his workload?

WHICH IS IT, MATT?

I don't recall him complaining about that.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/02/matt-forte-thinks-bears-are-grinding-me-into-a-pulp/

Besides these 2 links, show us where Forte is complaining.

Did Forte think next year he wouldn't have a backup RB?

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #51 on: March 22, 2012, 03:02:44 PM »
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 02:46:32 PM
Did Forte think next year he wouldn't have a backup RB?

A good one with a four year deal?

No.

BH

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,344
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #52 on: March 22, 2012, 03:06:53 PM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 22, 2012, 03:02:44 PM
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 02:46:32 PM
Did Forte think next year he wouldn't have a backup RB?

A good one with a four year deal?

No.

Can we trade forte for mike wallace?

PenPho

  • Fukakke Fan Club
  • Posts: 1,846
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #53 on: March 22, 2012, 03:08:35 PM »
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 03:06:53 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 22, 2012, 03:02:44 PM
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 02:46:32 PM
Did Forte think next year he wouldn't have a backup RB?

A good one with a four year deal?

No.

Can we trade forte for mike wallace?

Not at $7/mill a season.

But otherwise, I'd probably take that deal as a Steelers fan. 
"I use exit numbers because they tell me how many miles are left since they're based off of the molested"

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #54 on: March 22, 2012, 03:24:27 PM »
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 03:06:53 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 22, 2012, 03:02:44 PM
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 02:46:32 PM
Did Forte think next year he wouldn't have a backup RB?

A good one with a four year deal?

No.

Can we trade forte for mike wallace?

I hear that guy plays hard for the entire 60 Minutes.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #55 on: March 22, 2012, 03:26:43 PM »
Quote from: R-V on March 22, 2012, 03:24:27 PM
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 03:06:53 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 22, 2012, 03:02:44 PM
Quote from: BH on March 22, 2012, 02:46:32 PM
Did Forte think next year he wouldn't have a backup RB?

A good one with a four year deal?

No.

Can we trade forte for mike wallace?

I hear that guy plays hard for the entire 60 Minutes.

HI-OH!
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

Armchair_QB

  • Hank White Fan Club
  • Posts: 817
"I never read this book the Cardinals wrote way back in the day regarding how to play baseball."

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #57 on: March 27, 2012, 11:32:00 AM »
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #58 on: March 28, 2012, 01:51:56 PM »
The retired players are now going after the NFL over head injuries.

This could turn very, very big and bad for the NFL, and not just financially.  This could lead to parents preventing their kids from ever getting into the game.  I wouldn't let any of the Murtons do anything beyond field goal kicking.

Maybe this will finally get the PEDs out of the NFL.  Smaller guys would mean less violent impacts and fewer concussions.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2012 NFL General Thread
« Reply #59 on: March 28, 2012, 01:55:46 PM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 28, 2012, 01:51:56 PM
The retired players are now going after the NFL over head injuries.

This could turn very, very big and bad for the NFL, and not just financially.  This could lead to parents preventing their kids from ever getting into the game.  I wouldn't let any of the Murtons do anything beyond field goal kicking.

Maybe this will finally get the PEDs out of the NFL.  Smaller guys would mean less violent impacts and fewer concussions.

Quite possible. I'm more in the group that sees technological advances in protection as the answer. They're already developing headgear that's much more effective, and it's also amazing how simple changes like last year's annoying kick off rule helped to greatless reduce concussions.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015