News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: 2012 Chicago Cubs  ( 88,720 )

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2012, 11:14:26 AM »
Lots of crazy shit going down.

Rotation is: Dempster, Garza, Swashbuckler, Voltron and MAW HOLLUM.

DeWitt made the team.


Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #16 on: March 29, 2012, 12:28:29 PM »
[W] <-- flap x 75 in 2012.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #17 on: March 29, 2012, 01:06:24 PM »
Quote from: Internet Apex on March 29, 2012, 12:28:29 PM
[W] <-- flap x 75 61 in 2012.

Tankin' it'd

CBStew

  • Most people my age are dead.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Location: Berkeley, California
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2012, 01:19:37 PM »
My prediction is that by the end of November this thread will have around 50000 posts.  Most of them will be of the "WTF?" variety. 
If I had known that I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.   (Plagerized from numerous other folks)

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #19 on: March 29, 2012, 01:34:43 PM »
Quote from: CBStew on March 29, 2012, 01:19:37 PM
My prediction is that by the end of November this thread will have around 50000 posts.  Most of them will be of the "WTF?" variety. 

I think it'll have like 95 after apathy sets in during May about the blandest 73-win team ever.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2012, 01:36:23 PM »
Quote from: Eli on March 29, 2012, 01:34:43 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 29, 2012, 01:19:37 PM
My prediction is that by the end of November this thread will have around 50000 posts.  Most of them will be of the "WTF?" variety. 

I think it'll have like 95 after apathy sets in during May about the blandest 73-win team ever.

Jim Lefebrve's 1992 Cubs would like to have a word with you.
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #21 on: March 29, 2012, 02:06:11 PM »
What if David De Hayzus really is the Jesus and he was just waiting til 2012 to come back and piss in the Mayans' cornflakes? If that happens, I'd say 78 wins is a very real possibility.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

BH

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,344
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #22 on: March 29, 2012, 02:26:41 PM »
Have we decided who we are going to hate this season yet?

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #23 on: March 29, 2012, 02:32:17 PM »
Quote from: PANK! on March 29, 2012, 01:36:23 PM
Quote from: Eli on March 29, 2012, 01:34:43 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 29, 2012, 01:19:37 PM
My prediction is that by the end of November this thread will have around 50000 posts.  Most of them will be of the "WTF?" variety. 

I think it'll have like 95 after apathy sets in during May about the blandest 73-win team ever.

Jim Lefebrve's 1992 Cubs would like to have a word with you.

No thank you.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #24 on: March 29, 2012, 02:38:07 PM »
Quote from: BH on March 29, 2012, 02:26:41 PM
Have we decided who we are going to hate this season yet?

Huey.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #25 on: March 29, 2012, 02:51:35 PM »
Quote from: BH on March 29, 2012, 02:26:41 PM
Have we decided who we are going to hate this season yet?

Darwin Barney?
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #26 on: March 29, 2012, 02:56:46 PM »
Quote from: Sterling Archer on March 29, 2012, 02:51:35 PM
Quote from: BH on March 29, 2012, 02:26:41 PM
Have we decided who we are going to hate this season yet?

Darwin Barney?

It's gotta be Snork. Or possibly this Joe Mather guy who I know nothing about but I imagine is a less talented Sam Fuld that dipshits will embrace.

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #27 on: March 29, 2012, 03:00:04 PM »
Quote from: BH on March 29, 2012, 02:26:41 PM
Have we decided who we are going to hate this season yet?

I have a guy in mind.

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #28 on: March 29, 2012, 03:03:13 PM »
Quote from: Sterling Archer on March 29, 2012, 02:51:35 PM
Quote from: BH on March 29, 2012, 02:26:41 PM
Have we decided who we are going to hate this season yet?

Darwin Barney?

The only Asian dude on the team? No.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #29 on: March 29, 2012, 03:06:48 PM »
Quote from: R-V on March 29, 2012, 02:56:46 PM
Quote from: Sterling Archer on March 29, 2012, 02:51:35 PM
Quote from: BH on March 29, 2012, 02:26:41 PM
Have we decided who we are going to hate this season yet?

Darwin Barney?

It's gotta be Snork. Or possibly this Joe Mather guy who I know nothing about but I imagine is a less talented Sam Fuld that dipshits will embrace.

Intrepid Reader: Tony Campana

Hi.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16