News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: 2012 Chicago Cubs  ( 89,088 )

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #150 on: April 16, 2012, 10:45:03 AM »
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 16, 2012, 10:39:21 AM
Quote from: Brownie on April 16, 2012, 10:28:42 AM
So the argument pits Chuck, on one side, suggesting a Castro trade to the Cardinals for Tyler Greene and cash should happen before the COB today, vs. everyone else, who would not listen to any offers involving Starlin Castro unless it was Longoria and Price or Upton and Verlander.

No. This argument merely pits Chuck against his sworn archenemy: ordinary fucking logic.

I don't think anyone here would be on principle against trading Castro for value. I think we're all mostly just opposed to Chuck making ridiculous bald assertions to the effect of such a trade "becoming more and more likely".

Because, you know, new shit has come to light or something. I guess.

New shit like Castro being at "peak value". And the 2012 season starting.

Because Tom Ricketts was smart enough to hire Theo Epstein to run the team, but dumb enough to run around shitting his pants in panic after a shitty team started the year with a shitty record. Or something.

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #151 on: April 16, 2012, 10:54:51 AM »
Quote from: Brownie on April 16, 2012, 10:28:42 AM
So the argument pits Chuck, on one side, suggesting a Castro trade to the Cardinals for Tyler Greene and cash should happen before the COB today, vs. everyone else, who would not listen to any offers involving Starlin Castro unless it was Longoria and Price or Upton and Verlander.

Chuck already conceded that his Twitter argument was poorly worded and wrong.

I will say it again. Who are the Cubs able to trade and get multiple everyday players that can help them years into the future? Garza, probably. Soto, maybe. Marmol, if he gets it together. Byrd? Dempster? Kerry Wood? Soriano? David DeJesus? Ian Stewart? Samardzija? Rodrigo Lopez? Brian The Hair? Anthony Rizzo? Josh Vitters? The thought that Castro would be part of a blockbuster deal sometime over the next 2 years isn't inane.

Seriously, what type of return makes trading Castro worth it? I suppose I was joking about Longoria, Price, Verlander and Upton, but not entirely.

Of course everyone would "listen" to offers for Castro. But since you're the one who's sympathetic to Chuck in this argument, what sort of player return would you want for this hypothetical Castro trade?

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #152 on: April 16, 2012, 11:07:56 AM »
Quote from: R-V on April 16, 2012, 10:45:03 AM
Quote from: J. Walter Weatherman on April 16, 2012, 10:39:21 AM
Quote from: Brownie on April 16, 2012, 10:28:42 AM
So the argument pits Chuck, on one side, suggesting a Castro trade to the Cardinals for Tyler Greene and cash should happen before the COB today, vs. everyone else, who would not listen to any offers involving Starlin Castro unless it was Longoria and Price or Upton and Verlander.

No. This argument merely pits Chuck against his sworn archenemy: ordinary fucking logic.

I don't think anyone here would be on principle against trading Castro for value. I think we're all mostly just opposed to Chuck making ridiculous bald assertions to the effect of such a trade "becoming more and more likely".

Because, you know, new shit has come to light or something. I guess.

New shit like Castro being at "peak value". And the 2012 season starting.

Because Tom Ricketts was smart enough to hire Theo Epstein to run the team, but dumb enough to run around shitting his pants in panic after a shitty team started the year with a shitty record. Or something.

But, don't you see?

Theo wasn't hired because Ricketts is smart. Theo was hired because Ricketts is a no account goldbricker whose new toy was bleeding red ink. (A no account goldbricker who also lacked the balls to hire Andrew Friedman as half of his diarchy of baseball guys.)

It's all of a piece with Internet Chuck's Unified Theory of Tom. Which was almost entirely gleaned from that one video Chuck watched of Papa Joe talking about some things that one time.
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #153 on: April 16, 2012, 11:35:51 AM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on April 16, 2012, 09:51:37 AM
To be clear, I would be pissed if they traded Castro for scraps.

This is my favorite clarification ever.
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

Slaky

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Location: Bucktown
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #154 on: April 16, 2012, 11:45:04 AM »
Why does Gil expect Samardjiza to be traded by July 31st?

Do people think this?

J. Walter Weatherman

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,485
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #155 on: April 16, 2012, 11:54:08 AM »
Quote from: Slaky on April 16, 2012, 11:45:04 AM
Why does Gil expect Samardjiza to be traded by July 31st?

Do people think this?

Gil has the same inside sources as Chuck.
Loor and I came acrossks like opatoets.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #156 on: April 16, 2012, 12:01:43 PM »
I meant to embolden Snork and ask Gil, "O RLY" but then saw a dog with a fluffy tail or something.
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #157 on: April 16, 2012, 12:25:07 PM »
Quote from: Eli on April 16, 2012, 10:54:51 AM
Seriously, what type of return makes trading Castro worth it? I suppose I was joking about Longoria, Price, Verlander and Upton, but not entirely.

Of course everyone would "listen" to offers for Castro. But since you're the one who's sympathetic to Chuck in this argument, what sort of player return would you want for this hypothetical Castro trade?

That's the problem. In return for Castro, you'd want a player in his early-to-mid 20s who is an established major leaguer with a big upside. Then you'd also look for either a blue chip prospect or a couple minor leaguers who project to be solid big leaguers.

In other words, they'd essentially have to trade Castro for Castro and stuff. Because the only way you trade a 22-year-old shortstop who already has two seasons of OPS+ of 100 or higher is if you're Chuck.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #158 on: April 16, 2012, 01:03:02 PM »
Quote from: Fork on April 16, 2012, 12:25:07 PM
In other words, they'd essentially have to trade Castro for Castro and stuff.

Exactly this.

morpheus

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,524
  • Location: Brookfield, IL
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #159 on: April 16, 2012, 01:22:52 PM »
Quote from: Eli on April 16, 2012, 01:03:02 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 16, 2012, 12:25:07 PM
In other words, they'd essentially have to trade Castro for Castro and stuff.

Exactly this.

Seams right.
I don't get that KurtEvans photoshop.

Internet Apex

  • SSM's Resident Octagonacologist
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 9,128
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #160 on: April 16, 2012, 01:25:47 PM »
Quote from: Eli on April 16, 2012, 01:03:02 PM
Quote from: Fork on April 16, 2012, 12:25:07 PM
In other words, they'd essentially have to trade Castro for Castro and stuff.

Exactly this.

If you don't think this is increasingly likely, you haven't been paying attention.
The 37th Tenet of Pexism:  Apestink is terrible.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #161 on: April 16, 2012, 01:45:03 PM »
Quote from: PANK! on April 16, 2012, 12:01:43 PM
I meant to embolden Snork and ask Gil, "O RLY" but then saw a dog with a fluffy tail or something.

It was mostly me being cheeky, but isn't he a FA after the season?
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Eli

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,048
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #162 on: April 16, 2012, 01:47:46 PM »
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 16, 2012, 01:45:03 PM
Quote from: PANK! on April 16, 2012, 12:01:43 PM
I meant to embolden Snork and ask Gil, "O RLY" but then saw a dog with a fluffy tail or something.

It was mostly me being cheeky, but isn't he a FA after the season?

Not until after 2015.

Gilgamesh

  • Unlimited Mullet Potential
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,530
  • Location: Peoria, IL
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #163 on: April 16, 2012, 02:21:37 PM »
Quote from: Eli on April 16, 2012, 01:47:46 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 16, 2012, 01:45:03 PM
Quote from: PANK! on April 16, 2012, 12:01:43 PM
I meant to embolden Snork and ask Gil, "O RLY" but then saw a dog with a fluffy tail or something.

It was mostly me being cheeky, but isn't he a FA after the season?

Not until after 2015.

Sweet Jesus!
This is so bad, I'd root for the Orioles over this fucking team, but I can't. Because they're a fucking drug and you can't kick it and they'll never win anything and they'll always suck, but it'll always be sunny at Wrigley and there will be tits and ivy and an old scoreboard and fucking Chads.

Bort

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,605
Re: 2012 Chicago Cubs
« Reply #164 on: April 16, 2012, 02:48:48 PM »
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 16, 2012, 02:21:37 PM
Quote from: Eli on April 16, 2012, 01:47:46 PM
Quote from: Gilgamesh on April 16, 2012, 01:45:03 PM
Quote from: PANK! on April 16, 2012, 12:01:43 PM
I meant to embolden Snork and ask Gil, "O RLY" but then saw a dog with a fluffy tail or something.

It was mostly me being cheeky, but isn't he a FA after the season?

Not until after 2015.

Sweet Jesus!

NOOOOOOOOOOO!
"Javier Baez is the stupidest player in Cubs history next to Michael Barrett." Internet Chuck