Chicago Bears 2012 Championship Season: Lovestink is Forever.

[SKO]

Fuck Green Bay... but that was horrendous.

On the reverse angle, it looked like dual possession to me. 

But why didn't GB go for the block and run back?  And why didn't Seattle just go for 2 in victory formation and make sure nothing happened? 

Also, Seattle's front four looked like the Bears' pressure in the late Jauron and early Lovie days.  Just dominant without blitzing.

Well, so far this Bears front four has gotten 13 sacks in 3 games with a four man rush. So, happy days are here again.

[R-V]

Fuck Green Bay... but that was horrendous.

On the reverse angle, it looked like dual possession to me. 

But why didn't GB go for the block and run back?  And why didn't Seattle just go for 2 in victory formation and make sure nothing happened? 

Also, Seattle's front four looked like the Bears' pressure in the late Jauron and early current Lovie days.  Just dominant without blitzing.

You can't return a blocked PAT in pro ball. That's an NCAA rule.

I fixed another error. In this upside down era of replacement refs it's comforting to come here knowing that CFiHP will have at least a couple of things wrong in each post.

[Brownie]

Fuck Green Bay... but that was horrendous.

On the reverse angle, it looked like dual possession to me. 

But why didn't GB go for the block and run back?  And why didn't Seattle just go for 2 in victory formation and make sure nothing happened? 

Also, Seattle's front four looked like the Bears' pressure in the late Jauron and early current Lovie days.  Just dominant without blitzing.

You can't return a blocked PAT in pro ball. That's an NCAA rule.

I fixed another error. In this upside down era of replacement refs it's comforting to come here knowing that CFiHP will have at least a couple of things wrong in each post.

To be fair, Marinelli has them blitzing with the safety, nickel and Briggs a fair bit.

[SKO]

Fuck Green Bay... but that was horrendous.

On the reverse angle, it looked like dual possession to me. 

But why didn't GB go for the block and run back?  And why didn't Seattle just go for 2 in victory formation and make sure nothing happened? 

Also, Seattle's front four looked like the Bears' pressure in the late Jauron and early current Lovie days.  Just dominant without blitzing.

You can't return a blocked PAT in pro ball. That's an NCAA rule.

I fixed another error. In this upside down era of replacement refs it's comforting to come here knowing that CFiHP will have at least a couple of things wrong in each post.

To be fair, Marinelli has them blitzing with the safety, nickel and Briggs a fair bit.

He's worked in some blitzes, but they're rushing with just four on 86% of their snaps, and they're bringing it home. Tampa Two. It's wonderful when it works.

[Quality Start Machine]

Fuck Dallas.

In the ass.

With a cactus.

[Armchair_QB]

It's been a little over 12 hours and I'm still laughing at the Packers.

[Internet Apex]

It's been a little over 12 hours and I'm still laughing at the Packers.

Me too. I even did a Wonka meme.

[Shooter]

Ah, not as bad a replay-refs fiasco as this.

The Bears deserved to lose based on Ditka's hat.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

Fuck you.

[flannj]

Fuck you.

A whole sploogethread devoted to #33 might be in order.

[World's #1 Astros Fan]

Briggs.

[Waco Kid]

Fuck Dallas

[Armchair_QB]

Tomorrow will be one of those days I enjoy living in Dallas.

Primarily because people will be screaming for Neckbeard to start the next game.

[Internet Apex]

Fuck you.

A whole sploogethread devoted to #33 might be in order.

Let's do it.

[SKO]

Tomorrow will be one of those days I enjoy living in Dallas.

Primarily because people will be screaming for Neckbeard to start the next game.

I'm willing to listen to offers on the site name.