Morning in America: Butthurt Achieved

[J. Walter Weatherman]

A defeated Mitt Romney or awesome Bruce Campbell?

You decide!

Unsqueeze'd

[Oleg]

A defeated Mitt Romney or awesome Bruce Campbell?

You decide!

Seriously, who is that?

He's a pair of sweatpants away from turning into George Costanza.

[Internet Apex]

A defeated Mitt Romney or awesome Bruce Campbell?

You decide!

Unsqueeze'd

This picture is in more dire need of something BIG than something something.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

What exactly is Mitt's right hand up to?

[thehawk]

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/establish-tradition-vice-presidential-trans-am/TMBLqLCS

[Gilgamesh]

Dean Chambers, the founder of UnSkewedPolls.com, launched a new website last week alleging that President Barack Obama did not legitimately carry Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Florida, but instead won those states thanks to voter fraud.

http://www.barackofraudo.com/

[morpheus]

Dean Chambers, the founder of UnSkewedPolls.com, launched a new website last week alleging that President Barack Obama did not legitimately carry Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Florida, but instead won those states thanks to voter fraud.

http://www.barackofraudo.com/

*BLACK* states?

[Slaky]

Baracko Fraudo?

Did Huey come up with the url?

[J. Walter Weatherman]

I love that he's forced to include PA, which Obama won by a margin of a nearly 300,000 votes, in order to get under 270.

I also like that his proof is just a list of vote counts in urban precincts that Obama won by a lot.

That sure is a lot of numbers!

http://www.barackofraudo.com/voter_turnout_2012.cfm

Voter Suppression: Clearly, the raw number of votes nationally is way down from where it was in 2008. For months the mainstream media clearly communicated a message with ONE voice, that Barack Obama was likely to win reelection, Mitt Romney was a weakened candidate that was damaged in the primary process and further weakened when Obama attacked him with tens of millions of negative ads on TV and Romney stood no chance of getting elected. That millions of potential Republican voters, that vote for McCain in 2008 while far less enthused about doing so, did not turn out to vote for Romney in 2012 clearly proves the voter suppression campaign waged by the mainstream media and to some extent by the Democrat Party, worked quite well.

While the overall strategy was voter suppression, it is clear from viewing these stats that boosting the turnout in key swing states (the ones in yellow above) was taking place as well. Without further or more detailed proof, there is objectively two ways to increase voter turnout on the side of those supporting Obama, as it clearly did happen in some key swing states: either get more real people out to vote who will vote for Obama, or stuff the ballot boxes and engage in a variety of vote fraud and vote scamming methods. Odds are quite likely, to maximize their odds of succeeding in getting President Obama elected, that they engaged in all of the above to make it happen. Other information presented on this web site is gradually building the case that the margin of voter fraud exceeds any real margin by which this race was won by Obama. It is beginning to appear that the likely Romney victory, even it was to be close, that many believed was going to happen was actually going to happen if it was reversed with vote fraud.

A triumph of the Paranoid Style.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

Baracko Fraudo?

Did Huey come up with the url?

O'Beanzo

[Quality Start Machine]

I love that he's forced to include PA, which Obama won by a margin of a nearly 300,000 votes, in order to get under 270.

I also like that his proof is just a list of vote counts in urban precincts that Obama won by a lot.

That sure is a lot of numbers!

http://www.barackofraudo.com/voter_turnout_2012.cfm

Voter Suppression: Clearly, the raw number of votes nationally is way down from where it was in 2008. For months the mainstream media clearly communicated a message with ONE voice, that Barack Obama was likely to win reelection, Mitt Romney was a weakened candidate that was damaged in the primary process and further weakened when Obama attacked him with tens of millions of negative ads on TV and Romney stood no chance of getting elected. That millions of potential Republican voters, that vote for McCain in 2008 while far less enthused about doing so, did not turn out to vote for Romney in 2012 clearly proves the voter suppression campaign waged by the mainstream media and to some extent by the Democrat Party, worked quite well.

While the overall strategy was voter suppression, it is clear from viewing these stats that boosting the turnout in key swing states (the ones in yellow above) was taking place as well. Without further or more detailed proof, there is objectively two ways to increase voter turnout on the side of those supporting Obama, as it clearly did happen in some key swing states: either get more real people out to vote who will vote for Obama, or stuff the ballot boxes and engage in a variety of vote fraud and vote scamming methods. Odds are quite likely, to maximize their odds of succeeding in getting President Obama elected, that they engaged in all of the above to make it happen. Other information presented on this web site is gradually building the case that the margin of voter fraud exceeds any real margin by which this race was won by Obama. It is beginning to appear that the likely Romney victory, even it was to be close, that many believed was going to happen was actually going to happen if it was reversed with vote fraud.

A triumph of the Paranoid Style.

So if voter suppression was the reason why Romney got less votes than McCain, how does he explain 2012 Obama getting almost 6 million less votes than 2008 Obama?

[powen01]

I love that he's forced to include PA, which Obama won by a margin of a nearly 300,000 votes, in order to get under 270.

I also like that his proof is just a list of vote counts in urban precincts that Obama won by a lot.

That sure is a lot of numbers!

http://www.barackofraudo.com/voter_turnout_2012.cfm

Voter Suppression: Clearly, the raw number of votes nationally is way down from where it was in 2008. For months the mainstream media clearly communicated a message with ONE voice, that Barack Obama was likely to win reelection, Mitt Romney was a weakened candidate that was damaged in the primary process and further weakened when Obama attacked him with tens of millions of negative ads on TV and Romney stood no chance of getting elected. That millions of potential Republican voters, that vote for McCain in 2008 while far less enthused about doing so, did not turn out to vote for Romney in 2012 clearly proves the voter suppression campaign waged by the mainstream media and to some extent by the Democrat Party, worked quite well.

While the overall strategy was voter suppression, it is clear from viewing these stats that boosting the turnout in key swing states (the ones in yellow above) was taking place as well. Without further or more detailed proof, there is objectively two ways to increase voter turnout on the side of those supporting Obama, as it clearly did happen in some key swing states: either get more real people out to vote who will vote for Obama, or stuff the ballot boxes and engage in a variety of vote fraud and vote scamming methods. Odds are quite likely, to maximize their odds of succeeding in getting President Obama elected, that they engaged in all of the above to make it happen. Other information presented on this web site is gradually building the case that the margin of voter fraud exceeds any real margin by which this race was won by Obama. It is beginning to appear that the likely Romney victory, even it was to be close, that many believed was going to happen was actually going to happen if it was reversed with vote fraud.

A triumph of the Paranoid Style.

So if voter suppression was the reason why Romney got less votes than McCain, how does he explain 2012 Obama getting almost 6 million less votes than 2008 Obama?

It's pretty clear there was voter suppression.  Sorry you guys can't face up to facts.   America was responding to a really positive pro-rape platform, until the mainstream media engaged in outright voter suppression.  It's time to secede.  I don't need the UN running my life.

[J. Walter Weatherman]

I love that he's forced to include PA, which Obama won by a margin of a nearly 300,000 votes, in order to get under 270.

I also like that his proof is just a list of vote counts in urban precincts that Obama won by a lot.

That sure is a lot of numbers!

http://www.barackofraudo.com/voter_turnout_2012.cfm

Voter Suppression: Clearly, the raw number of votes nationally is way down from where it was in 2008. For months the mainstream media clearly communicated a message with ONE voice, that Barack Obama was likely to win reelection, Mitt Romney was a weakened candidate that was damaged in the primary process and further weakened when Obama attacked him with tens of millions of negative ads on TV and Romney stood no chance of getting elected. That millions of potential Republican voters, that vote for McCain in 2008 while far less enthused about doing so, did not turn out to vote for Romney in 2012 clearly proves the voter suppression campaign waged by the mainstream media and to some extent by the Democrat Party, worked quite well.

While the overall strategy was voter suppression, it is clear from viewing these stats that boosting the turnout in key swing states (the ones in yellow above) was taking place as well. Without further or more detailed proof, there is objectively two ways to increase voter turnout on the side of those supporting Obama, as it clearly did happen in some key swing states: either get more real people out to vote who will vote for Obama, or stuff the ballot boxes and engage in a variety of vote fraud and vote scamming methods. Odds are quite likely, to maximize their odds of succeeding in getting President Obama elected, that they engaged in all of the above to make it happen. Other information presented on this web site is gradually building the case that the margin of voter fraud exceeds any real margin by which this race was won by Obama. It is beginning to appear that the likely Romney victory, even it was to be close, that many believed was going to happen was actually going to happen if it was reversed with vote fraud.

A triumph of the Paranoid Style.

So if voter suppression was the reason why Romney got less votes than McCain, how does he explain 2012 Obama getting almost 6 million less votes than 2008 Obama?

Turnout was roughly even in swing states, down in most other states.

[Wheezer]

Apparently, Chambers is also a welsher. Little did I know that lawyers get to arrest people.

I consulted with my lawyer and confirmed that the bet we made is indeed legal. When I told Dean this, he countered that (a) he also had a lawyer, (b) he had advised Dean that the bet is illegal, and (c) she would arrest me if I tried to collect my winnings. (You read that correctly. Evidently, Dean's lawyer had a sex change operation in the middle of our exchange.)

[Gilgamesh]

It looks like we're punting a decision on WalMart's charge until after Black Friday.

Enjoy the holiday, folks, just keep in mind the people who won't be able to.