News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross  ( 104,498 )

Chuck to Chuck

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,831
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1110 on: March 09, 2016, 12:17:46 PM »
Quote from: InternetApex on March 09, 2016, 11:24:26 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Jim Kaat threw 200 and 269 in his age 22 and 23 seasons respectively. Which begs the question, what did you actually read?

I want to say it was a piece on Nolan Ryan's longevity.  Some time between 1985 and 1995. Searched the SI vault for a few minutes. Will look again later. The article wasn't as absolute as my off the cuff post suggested.  Wish I could find it.

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1111 on: March 09, 2016, 12:27:45 PM »
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 12:17:46 PM
Quote from: InternetApex on March 09, 2016, 11:24:26 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Jim Kaat threw 200 and 269 in his age 22 and 23 seasons respectively. Which begs the question, what did you actually read?

I want to say it was a piece on Nolan Ryan's longevity.  Some time between 1985 and 1995. Searched the SI vault for a few minutes. Will look again later. The article wasn't as absolute as my off the cuff post suggested.  Wish I could find it.

It's in Chuck's datase.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1112 on: March 09, 2016, 12:31:12 PM »
Quote from: PenFoe on March 09, 2016, 12:27:45 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 12:17:46 PM
Quote from: InternetApex on March 09, 2016, 11:24:26 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Jim Kaat threw 200 and 269 in his age 22 and 23 seasons respectively. Which begs the question, what did you actually read?

I want to say it was a piece on Nolan Ryan's longevity.  Some time between 1985 and 1995. Searched the SI vault for a few minutes. Will look again later. The article wasn't as absolute as my off the cuff post suggested.  Wish I could find it.

It's in Chuck's datase.

I think Chuck "read it" in that he wrote it down and then he read it.
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1113 on: March 09, 2016, 12:39:07 PM »
Quote from: Tonker on March 09, 2016, 11:55:01 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Greg Maddux age/innings counts:

22 - 249
23 - 238
24 - 237
25 - 263
26 - 268
27 - 267
...
42 - 194


The problem with these examples is that, of course, we all know of the HoFers who threw forever and a lot.

But, there was also Jim Gullickson and Steve Avery and a shitton of other pitchers who are even less memorable because they blew their arms out at a young age because we simply didn't know any better back then.  I would venture to guess that Maddux and Jenkins and Ryan and Seaver were much more of exceptions to the rule.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1114 on: March 09, 2016, 12:56:08 PM »
Quote from: Oleg on March 09, 2016, 12:39:07 PM
Quote from: Tonker on March 09, 2016, 11:55:01 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Greg Maddux age/innings counts:

22 - 249
23 - 238
24 - 237
25 - 263
26 - 268
27 - 267
...
42 - 194


The problem with these examples is that, of course, we all know of the HoFers who threw forever and a lot.

But, there was also Jim Gullickson and Steve Avery and a shitton of other pitchers who are even less memorable because they blew their arms out at a young age because we simply didn't know any better back then.  I would venture to guess that Maddux and Jenkins and Ryan and Seaver were much more of exceptions to the rule.

Right, back in the day people also didn't have the kind of information about prospects and stuff that we do now. Who knows how many Jose Fernandezes blew their arms out in the minors in the 70s and nobody ever knew what they'd lost, what they never had.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

CBStew

  • Most people my age are dead.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Location: Berkeley, California
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1115 on: March 09, 2016, 01:44:43 PM »
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.
Spahn and Sain and pray for rain.
If I had known that I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.   (Plagerized from numerous other folks)

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1116 on: March 09, 2016, 01:45:05 PM »
Quote from: Oleg on March 09, 2016, 12:39:07 PM
Quote from: Tonker on March 09, 2016, 11:55:01 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Greg Maddux age/innings counts:

22 - 249
23 - 238
24 - 237
25 - 263
26 - 268
27 - 267
...
42 - 194


The problem with these examples is that, of course, we all know of the HoFers who threw forever and a lot.

But, there was also Jim Gullickson and Steve Avery and a shitton of other pitchers who are even less memorable because they blew their arms out at a young age because we simply didn't know any better back then.  I would venture to guess that Maddux and Jenkins and Ryan and Seaver were much more of exceptions to the rule.

It could also be that the conventional wisdom existed then that the average pitcher was just done by age 30, so when beasts like Sam McDowell or Jim Maloney crapped out it was expected.
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

CBStew

  • Most people my age are dead.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Location: Berkeley, California
If I had known that I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.   (Plagerized from numerous other folks)

CBStew

  • Most people my age are dead.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Location: Berkeley, California
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1118 on: March 09, 2016, 01:57:34 PM »
I was listening to this game while studying for finals in law school

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/MLN/MLN195905260.shtml
If I had known that I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.   (Plagerized from numerous other folks)

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1119 on: March 09, 2016, 02:06:16 PM »
Quote from: CBStew on March 09, 2016, 01:51:33 PM
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_23576938/pitch-counts-not-marichal-spahn-era



I think the only thing that's crystal clear from the article is that Juan Marichal should be kept really far away from young pitchers.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1120 on: March 09, 2016, 02:09:08 PM »
Quote from: Oleg on March 09, 2016, 02:06:16 PM
Quote from: CBStew on March 09, 2016, 01:51:33 PM
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_23576938/pitch-counts-not-marichal-spahn-era



I think the only thing that's crystal clear from the article is that Juan Marichal should be kept really far away from young pitchers.

That's almost but not quite as dumb as Jason Isringhausen, the former great starting pitching prospect whose career was ruined by elbow injuries, complaining how kids today have it easy and how in his day you threw complete games in the minors by god.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1121 on: March 09, 2016, 03:01:54 PM »
Quote from: PenFoe on March 09, 2016, 12:27:45 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 12:17:46 PM
Quote from: InternetApex on March 09, 2016, 11:24:26 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Jim Kaat threw 200 and 269 in his age 22 and 23 seasons respectively. Which begs the question, what did you actually read?

I want to say it was a piece on Nolan Ryan's longevity.  Some time between 1985 and 1995. Searched the SI vault for a few minutes. Will look again later. The article wasn't as absolute as my off the cuff post suggested.  Wish I could find it.

It's in Chuck's datase.

Ah the infamous Friedman is Better than Theo datase. As elusive as the Ark of the Covenant.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1122 on: March 09, 2016, 03:12:59 PM »
Quote from: R-V on March 09, 2016, 03:01:54 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on March 09, 2016, 12:27:45 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 12:17:46 PM
Quote from: InternetApex on March 09, 2016, 11:24:26 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Jim Kaat threw 200 and 269 in his age 22 and 23 seasons respectively. Which begs the question, what did you actually read?

I want to say it was a piece on Nolan Ryan's longevity.  Some time between 1985 and 1995. Searched the SI vault for a few minutes. Will look again later. The article wasn't as absolute as my off the cuff post suggested.  Wish I could find it.

It's in Chuck's datase.

Ah the infamous Friedman is Better than Theo datase. As elusive as the Ark of the Covenant.

It'll be really fascinating to see how that dataset looks in a few years now that both of them are running big market teams.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1123 on: March 09, 2016, 05:44:30 PM »
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 03:12:59 PM
Quote from: R-V on March 09, 2016, 03:01:54 PM
Quote from: PenFoe on March 09, 2016, 12:27:45 PM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 12:17:46 PM
Quote from: InternetApex on March 09, 2016, 11:24:26 AM
Quote from: Chuck to Chuck on March 09, 2016, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: Median Desipio Chucklehead on March 09, 2016, 11:00:13 AM
Quote from: SKO on March 09, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I really wonder how the hell guys back in the 60s handled those workloads. Fergie Jenkins averaged 301 IP from age 24-32. I know they didn't throw as hard as guys now, but by most accounts Fergie threw 90+. I don't know how anyone's arm survived that.

I don't know if this mattered, but everyone used a full windup back then. Not sure if that meant more body velocity and less wear on the arm. Hell, it seemed like every pitcher on the Mets had a huge ass and they all drove their bodies toward the plate, with their knee hitting the dirt. Not a lot of sore arms on those fucking Mets teams...Gary Gentry was the only one that springs to mind.

Jim Bouton is a good example and he talks about it a lot in his book. He averaged 260 innings at 24 and 25 and by 26 his fastball was completely gone, which is why he had to re-invent himself as a knuckleballer just to hang around the game for another few years. You wonder how many of those guys could have had 10 year careers as starters if they had the same kind of limitations as they do now.

Years ago, SI had an article about the guys with longevity all never hit 200 innings in a year at any level until after they turned 25. Interesting correlation.

Jim Kaat threw 200 and 269 in his age 22 and 23 seasons respectively. Which begs the question, what did you actually read?

I want to say it was a piece on Nolan Ryan's longevity.  Some time between 1985 and 1995. Searched the SI vault for a few minutes. Will look again later. The article wasn't as absolute as my off the cuff post suggested.  Wish I could find it.

It's in Chuck's datase.

Ah the infamous Friedman is Better than Theo datase. As elusive as the Ark of the Covenant.

It'll be really fascinating to see how that dataset looks in a few years now that both of them are running big market teams.

LA has the top ranked farm system now. That means the Cubs' talent well is drying up. Epstink is terrible. Fire Theo.
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: 2015 Cubs Offseason: Building a Winner Around David Ross
« Reply #1124 on: March 10, 2016, 02:31:52 PM »
Some fun facts from Tristan Cockroft's ESPN piece today.

Quote
- After striking out in 33.9 percent of his trips to the plate between the majors and minors in 2014, seventh-highest of any pro, Javier Baez cut his whiff rate to 24.5 percent between the majors and minors in 2015. That 9.4 percent improvement was the second-best among any professional baseball player who had at least 400 plate appearances in both seasons, behind only Nick Williams (28.6 percent to 18.8, 9.8 percent improvement).

- Kyle Schwarber is only the 10th player in the past 100 years to manage at least 16 home runs and 36 walks through his first 69 career games. He is the only one of the 10 to have caught a single one of those 69 games; he caught 21 games and totaled five home runs and eight walks while playing that position.

- In 2015, Kris Bryant became only the 17th player in history to manage at least 25 home runs, .200 isolated power and a 10 percent walk rate during their rookie seasons. Among some of the other names on the list: Joe Gordon, Albert Pujols, Al Rosen, Mike Trout, Ted Williams.
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.