News:

OK A-holes.  It's fixed.  Enjoy the orange links, because I have no fucking idea how to change them.  I basically learned scripting in four days to fix this damned thing. - Andy

Main Menu

Author Topic: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE  ( 105,386 )

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #510 on: June 15, 2016, 08:12:25 AM »
Quote from: SKO on June 15, 2016, 07:31:36 AM
The 9th inning defensive alignment of Ross/Rizzo/Baez/Russell/Bryant with Almora/Fowler/Heyward in the OF is probably the single best defense the Cubs have fielded in my lifetime.

You're stealing my bit.  Sort of.

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #511 on: June 15, 2016, 05:39:32 PM »
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Fuck the Nationals.
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #512 on: June 15, 2016, 07:16:48 PM »
Quote from: Saul Goodman on June 15, 2016, 05:39:32 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Fuck the Nationals.

Also fuck not being able to finish off the Nationals.
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #513 on: June 15, 2016, 07:26:53 PM »
Adam Warren can get fucked.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #514 on: June 15, 2016, 07:29:36 PM »
And Rondon struck out Harper. Twice.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Saul Goodman

  • Not NOT Sterling
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 6,511
  • Location: California
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #515 on: June 15, 2016, 07:33:28 PM »
Quote from: SKO on June 15, 2016, 07:29:36 PM
And Rondon struck out Harper. Twice.

Davidson was brutal. That game should've been over; however, at the same time, the Cubs had multiple chances to win after that but couldn't stop fucking up. Miller and Betances, please.
You two wanna go stick your wangs in a hornet's nest, it's a free country.  But how come I always gotta get sloppy seconds, huh?

R-V

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,220
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #516 on: June 16, 2016, 09:28:28 AM »
I guess I didn't realize how below average the Cubs bullpen has been overall - I guess it's been masked so far by the starters pitching out of their mind, and Rondon in particular being really good.

20th in FIP
27th in BB/9
20th in HR/9
2nd in BABIP

The BABIP one gives me heartburn. I know this may be due in part to great defense/inducing weak contact, but given the other numbers they could be in for some regression even from their not-good performance so far.

This has to be the top priority at the deadline.

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #517 on: June 16, 2016, 09:33:47 AM »
Quote from: R-V on June 16, 2016, 09:28:28 AM
I guess I didn't realize how below average the Cubs bullpen has been overall - I guess it's been masked so far by the starters pitching out of their mind, and Rondon in particular being really good.

20th in FIP
27th in BB/9
20th in HR/9
2nd in BABIP

The BABIP one gives me heartburn. I know this may be due in part to great defense/inducing weak contact, but given the other numbers they could be in for some regression even from their not-good performance so far.

This has to be the top priority at the deadline.

Rondon and Strop are the only two who have actually been good. Warren has walked everybody and struck out no one all year long and got away with it for a little bit because he's still running a BABIP under .200 somehow, but he's been downright ass (4.18 ERA/5.67 FIP/5.48 xFIP, 5.32 BB/9). Cahill and Wood have both walked 4 or 5+ guys per 9 and while Cahill is striking out over 10 guys per 9 and can probably get away with it with his sinker, Wood isn't striking out anyone and he's clearly just smoke and mirrors so far.

Grimm is stuck in one of his spells where he can't throw strikes. They could definitely use another quality arm in the middle.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

SKO

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 8,694
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #518 on: June 16, 2016, 09:38:33 AM »
DPD, but yeah, while RV might be right about the low BABIP meaning some regression is probably coming, one would hope that would be off-set by Warren and Grimm eventually progressing back to the mean, velocity seems fine on both so I really don't see any reason why they can't get their shit together at some point. Wood is probably not very useful if his fastball is down from where it was as a reliever last year and he can't avoid walking guys. Cahill is a fine enough long reliever but they need to get back to not having to use him in high leverage situations.
I will vow, for the sake of peace, not to complain about David Ross between now and his first start next year- 10/26/2015

Quality Start Machine

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 12,577
  • Location: In the slot
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #519 on: June 16, 2016, 09:42:09 AM »
Quote from: SKO on June 16, 2016, 09:33:47 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 16, 2016, 09:28:28 AM
I guess I didn't realize how below average the Cubs bullpen has been overall - I guess it's been masked so far by the starters pitching out of their mind, and Rondon in particular being really good.

20th in FIP
27th in BB/9
20th in HR/9
2nd in BABIP

The BABIP one gives me heartburn. I know this may be due in part to great defense/inducing weak contact, but given the other numbers they could be in for some regression even from their not-good performance so far.

This has to be the top priority at the deadline.

Rondon and Strop are the only two who have actually been good. Warren has walked everybody and struck out no one all year long and got away with it for a little bit because he's still running a BABIP under .200 somehow, but he's been downright ass (4.18 ERA/5.67 FIP/5.48 xFIP, 5.32 BB/9). Cahill and Wood have both walked 4 or 5+ guys per 9 and while Cahill is striking out over 10 guys per 9 and can probably get away with it with his sinker, Wood isn't striking out anyone and he's clearly just smoke and mirrors so far.

Grimm is stuck in one of his spells where he can't throw strikes. They could definitely use another quality arm in the middle.

so the answer isn't Clayton Richard?
TIME TO POST!

"...their lead is no longer even remotely close to insurmountable " - SKO, 7/31/16

Oleg

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 3,921
  • Location: Chicago
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #520 on: June 16, 2016, 09:43:47 AM »
Quote from: R-V on June 16, 2016, 09:28:28 AM
I guess I didn't realize how below average the Cubs bullpen has been overall - I guess it's been masked so far by the starters pitching out of their mind, and Rondon in particular being really good.

20th in FIP
27th in BB/9
20th in HR/9
2nd in BABIP

The BABIP one gives me heartburn. I know this may be due in part to great defense/inducing weak contact, but given the other numbers they could be in for some regression even from their not-good performance so far.

This has to be the top priority at the deadline.

The other masking is that they've pitched the fewest innings in the majors (I assume that's still true).

But, yeah...bring me all the Millers and Chapmans!

CBStew

  • Most people my age are dead.
  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Location: Berkeley, California
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #521 on: June 16, 2016, 11:22:39 AM »
Quote from: Oleg on June 16, 2016, 09:43:47 AM
Quote from: R-V on June 16, 2016, 09:28:28 AM
I guess I didn't realize how below average the Cubs bullpen has been overall - I guess it's been masked so far by the starters pitching out of their mind, and Rondon in particular being really good.

20th in FIP
27th in BB/9
20th in HR/9
2nd in BABIP

The BABIP one gives me heartburn. I know this may be due in part to great defense/inducing weak contact, but given the other numbers they could be in for some regression even from their not-good performance so far.

This has to be the top priority at the deadline.

The other masking is that they've pitched the fewest innings in the majors (I assume that's still true).

But, yeah...bring me all the Millers and Chapmans!
Maybe Calvin Schiraldi is available.
If I had known that I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.   (Plagerized from numerous other folks)

PenFoe

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 4,739
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #522 on: June 16, 2016, 11:48:38 AM »
I can't believe I even know these people. I'm ashamed of my internet life.

World's #1 Astros Fan

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 5,089
  • Location: Hoffman Estates, IL
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #523 on: June 16, 2016, 11:53:36 AM »
Quote from: PenFoe on June 16, 2016, 11:48:38 AM
Contreras, bitches.

https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/743481087196815360

Quick--what's your favorite memory of the Tim Federowicz Era?
Just a sloppy, undisciplined team.  Garbage.

--SKO, on the 2018 Chicago Cubs

ChuckD

  • Johnny Evers Fan Club
  • Posts: 2,502
Re: The 2016 Cubs: SPLOOGE SPLOOGE SPLOOGE
« Reply #524 on: June 16, 2016, 11:57:12 AM »
Quote from: PANK! on June 16, 2016, 11:53:36 AM
Quote from: PenFoe on June 16, 2016, 11:48:38 AM
Contreras, bitches.

https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/743481087196815360

Quick--what's your favorite memory of the Tim Federowicz Era?

I liked it when Contreras was called up. #2 is that one game where he had a net positive WPA.